Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Celia Siu
dblp:121/5122
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
literature-based discovery |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A collaborative filtering-based approach to biomedical knowledge discovery · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Application and evaluation of automated methods to extract neuroanatomical connectivity statements from free text · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › knowledge representation in biology
biomedical knowledge graph |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | A collaborative filtering-based approach to biomedical knowledge discovery · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
singular value decomposition · 0.3collaborative filtering · 0.3shallow linguistic kernel · 0.1machine learning · 0.1dependency parsing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | A collaborative filtering-based approach to biomedical knowledge discoveryabstractMotivation: The increase in publication rates makes it challenging for an individual researcher to stay abreast of all relevant research in order to find novel research hypotheses. Literature-based discovery methods make use of knowledge graphs built using text mining and can infer future associations between biomedical concepts that will likely occur in new publications. These predictions are a valuable resource for researchers to explore a research topic. Current methods for prediction are based on the local structure of the knowledge graph. A method that uses global knowledge from across the knowledge graph needs to be developed in order to make knowledge discovery a frequently used tool by researchers. Results: We propose an approach based on the singular value decomposition (SVD) that is able to combine data from across the knowledge graph through a reduced representation. Using cooccurrence data extracted from published literature, we show that SVD performs better than the leading methods for scoring discoveries. We also show the diminishing predictive power of knowledge discovery as we compare our predictions with real associations that appear further into the future. Finally, we examine the strengths and weaknesses of the SVD approach against another well-performing system using several predicted associations. Availability and implementation: All code and results files for this analysis can be accessed at https://github.com/jakelever/knowledgediscovery. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jake Lever, Sitanshu Gakkhar, Michael Gottlieb, Tahereh Rashnavadi, Santina Lin, Celia Siu, Maia Smith, Martin R. Jones, Martin Krzywinski, Steven J. M. Jones |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2012 | Application and evaluation of automated methods to extract neuroanatomical connectivity statements from free textabstractMOTIVATION: Automated annotation of neuroanatomical connectivity statements from the neuroscience literature would enable accessible and large-scale connectivity resources. Unfortunately, the connectivity findings are not formally encoded and occur as natural language text. This hinders aggregation, indexing, searching and integration of the reports. We annotated a set of 1377 abstracts for connectivity relations to facilitate automated extraction of connectivity relationships from neuroscience literature. We tested several baseline measures based on co-occurrence and lexical rules. We compare results from seven machine learning methods adapted from the protein interaction extraction domain that employ part-of-speech, dependency and syntax features. RESULTS: Co-occurrence based methods provided high recall with weak precision. The shallow linguistic kernel recalled 70.1% of the sentence-level connectivity statements at 50.3% precision. Owing to its speed and simplicity, we applied the shallow linguistic kernel to a large set of new abstracts. To evaluate the results, we compared 2688 extracted connections with the Brain Architecture Management System (an existing database of rat connectivity). The extracted connections were connected in the Brain Architecture Management System at a rate of 63.5%, compared with 51.1% for co-occurring brain region pairs. We found that precision increases with the recency and frequency of the extracted relationships. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code, evaluations, documentation and other supplementary materials are available at http://www.chibi.ubc.ca/WhiteText. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Online. Leon French, Suzanne Lane, Lydia Xu, Celia Siu, Cathy Kwok, Claudia Krebs, Paul Pavlidis |
Bioinform. | 4 |