Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher Brumgard

dblp:122/0876 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-3973-539XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 88% High-performance computing · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
flash and SSD
0.412019
End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem · SC 2019
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
parallel file system
0.412019
End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem · SC 2019
Storage systems › i/o architecture
i/o subsystem
0.112019
End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem · SC 2019
High-performance computing
supercomputing
0.112019
End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem · SC 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

end-to-end i/o solution · 0.4data movement · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Data Jockey: Automatic Data Management for HPC Multi-tiered Storage Systems
abstract
We present the design and implementation of Data Jockey, a data management system for HPC multi-tiered storage systems. As a centralized data management control plane, Data Jockey automates bulk data movement and placement for scientific workflows and integrates into existing HPC storage infrastructures. Data Jockey simplifies data management by eliminating human effort in programming complex data movements, laying datasets across multiple storage tiers when supporting complex workflows, which in turn increases the usability of multitiered storage systems emerging in modern HPC data centers. Specifically, Data Jockey presents a new data management scheme called “goal driven data management” that can automatically infer low-level bulk data movement plans from declarative high-level goal statements that come from the lifetime of iterative runs of scientific workflows. While doing so, Data Jockey aims to minimize data wait times by taking responsibility for datasets that are unused or to be used, and aggressively utilizing the capacity of the upper, higher performant storage tiers. We evaluated a prototype implementation of Data Jockey under a synthetic workload based on a year's worth of Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility's (OLCF) operational logs. Our evaluations suggest that Data Jockey leads to higher utilization of the upper storage tiers while minimizing the programming effort of data movement compared to human involved, per-domain adhoc data management scripts.
Woong Shin, Christopher Brumgard, Sudharshan S. Vazhkudai, Devarshi Ghoshal, Sarp Oral, Lavanya Ramakrishnan
IPDPS2
2019 End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem
abstract
The I/O subsystem for the Summit supercomputer, No. 1 on the Top500 list, and its ecosystem of analysis platforms is composed of two distinct layers, namely the in-system layer and the center-wide parallel file system layer (PFS), Spider 3. The in-system layer uses node-local SSDs and provides 26.7 TB/s for reads, 9.7 TB/s for writes, and 4.6 billion IOPS to Summit. The Spider 3 PFS layer uses IBM's Spectrum Scale™ and provides 2.5 TB/s and 2.6 million IOPS to Summit and other systems. While deploying them as two distinct layers was operationally efficient, it also presented usability challenges in terms of multiple mount points and lack of transparency in data movement. To address these challenges, we have developed novel end-to-end I/O solutions for the concerted use of the two storage layers. We present the I/O subsystem architecture, the end-to-end I/O solution space, their design considerations and our deployment experience.
Sarp Oral, Sudharshan S. Vazhkudai, Feiyi Wang, Christopher Zimmer 0001, Christopher Brumgard, Jesse Hanley, George Markomanolis, Ross G. Miller, Dustin Leverman, Scott Atchley, Verónica G. Vergara Larrea
SC5