Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Terence J. O'Kane
dblp:122/0897
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-2137-5915ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Free-Form Variational Inference for Gaussian Process State-Space Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process dynamical model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Free-Form Variational Inference for Gaussian Process State-Space Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Free-Form Variational Inference for Gaussian Process State-Space Models · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.7particle MCMC · 0.7inducing variable formalism · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Free-Form Variational Inference for Gaussian Process State-Space ModelsabstractGaussian process state-space models (GPSSMs) provide a principled and flexible approach to modeling the dynamics of a latent state, which is observed at discrete-time points via a likelihood model. However, inference in GPSSMs is computationally and statistically challenging due to the large number of latent variables in the model and the strong temporal dependencies between them. In this paper, we propose a new method for inference in Bayesian GPSSMs, which overcomes the drawbacks of previous approaches, namely over-simplified assumptions, and high computational requirements. Our method is based on free-form variational inference via stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo within the inducing-variable formalism. Furthermore, by exploiting our proposed variational distribution, we provide a collapsed extension of our method where the inducing variables are marginalized analytically. We also showcase results when combining our framework with particle MCMC methods. We show that, on six real-world datasets, our approach can learn transition dynamics and latent states more accurately than competing methods. Xuhui Fan 0001, Edwin V. Bonilla, Terence J. O'Kane, Scott A. Sisson |
ICML | 3 |
| 2022 | eSPA+: Scalable Entropy-Optimal Machine Learning Classification for Small Data ProblemsabstractClassification problems in the small data regime (with small data statistic T and relatively large feature space dimension D) impose challenges for the common machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) tools. The standard learning methods from these areas tend to show a lack of robustness when applied to data sets with significantly fewer data points than dimensions and quickly reach the overfitting bound, thus leading to poor performance beyond the training set. To tackle this issue, we propose eSPA+, a significant extension of the recently formulated entropy-optimal scalable probabilistic approximation algorithm (eSPA). Specifically, we propose to change the order of the optimization steps and replace the most computationally expensive subproblem of eSPA with its closed-form solution. We prove that with these two enhancements, eSPA+ moves from the polynomial to the linear class of complexity scaling algorithms. On several small data learning benchmarks, we show that the eSPA+ algorithm achieves a many-fold speed-up with respect to eSPA and even better performance results when compared to a wide array of ML and DL tools. In particular, we benchmark eSPA+ against the standard eSPA and the main classes of common learning algorithms in the small data regime: various forms of support vector machines, random forests, and long short-term memory algorithms. In all the considered applications, the common learning methods and eSPA are markedly outperformed by eSPA+, which achieves significantly higher prediction accuracy with an orders-of-magnitude lower computational cost. Edoardo Vecchi, Lukás Pospísil, Steffen Albrecht, Terence J. O'Kane, Illia Horenko |
Neural Comput. | 4 |