Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul A. Jenkins
dblp:122/8763
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7603-4205ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics |
1.1 | 3 | 2023 | EWF: simulating exact paths of the Wright-Fisher diffusion · Bioinform. 2023 A Likelihood-Free Inference Framework for Population Genetic Data using Exchangeable Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2018 KwARG: parsimonious reconstruction of ancestral recombination graphs with recurrent mutation · Bioinform. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
simulation-based inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Likelihood-Free Inference Framework for Population Genetic Data using Exchangeable Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
likelihood-free inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Likelihood-Free Inference Framework for Population Genetic Data using Exchangeable Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Poisson Random Fields for Dynamic Feature Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
feature allocation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Poisson Random Fields for Dynamic Feature Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
indian buffet process |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Poisson Random Fields for Dynamic Feature Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Data mining › text mining
topic model |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Poisson Random Fields for Dynamic Feature Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov chain monte carlo · 1.2summary statistic-free inference · 0.7kolmogorov-smirnov test · 0.7exchangeable neural networks · 0.7wright-fisher model · 0.6parsimony · 0.5greedy heuristic · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | EWF: simulating exact paths of the Wright-Fisher diffusionabstractMOTIVATION: The Wright-Fisher diffusion is important in population genetics in modelling the evolution of allele frequencies over time subject to the influence of biological phenomena such as selection, mutation and genetic drift. Simulating the paths of the process is challenging due to the form of the transition density. We present EWF, a robust and efficient sampler which returns exact draws for the diffusion and diffusion bridge processes, accounting for general models of selection including those with frequency dependence. RESULTS: Given a configuration of selection, mutation and endpoints, EWF returns draws at the requested sampling times from the law of the corresponding Wright-Fisher process. Output was validated by comparison to approximations of the transition density via the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and QQ plots. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All softwares are available at https://github.com/JaroSant/EWF. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jaromir Sant, Paul A. Jenkins, Jere Koskela, Dario Spanò |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2021 | KwARG: parsimonious reconstruction of ancestral recombination graphs with recurrent mutationabstractMOTIVATION: The reconstruction of possible histories given a sample of genetic data in the presence of recombination and recurrent mutation is a challenging problem, but can provide key insights into the evolution of a population. We present KwARG, which implements a parsimony-based greedy heuristic algorithm for finding plausible genealogical histories (ancestral recombination graphs) that are minimal or near-minimal in the number of posited recombination and mutation events. RESULTS: Given an input dataset of aligned sequences, KwARG outputs a list of possible candidate solutions, each comprising a list of mutation and recombination events that could have generated the dataset; the relative proportion of recombinations and recurrent mutations in a solution can be controlled via specifying a set of 'cost' parameters. We demonstrate that the algorithm performs well when compared against existing methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available at https://github.com/a-ignatieva/kwarg. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Anastasia Ignatieva, Rune B. Lyngsø, Paul A. Jenkins, Jotun Hein |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2018 | A Likelihood-Free Inference Framework for Population Genetic Data using Exchangeable Neural NetworksabstractAn explosion of high-throughput DNA sequencing in the past decade has led to a surge of interest in population-scale inference with whole-genome data. Recent work in population genetics has centered on designing inference methods for relatively simple model classes, and few scalable general-purpose inference techniques exist for more realistic, complex models. To achieve this, two inferential challenges need to be addressed: (1) population data are exchangeable, calling for methods that efficiently exploit the symmetries of the data, and (2) computing likelihoods is intractable as it requires integrating over a set of correlated, extremely high-dimensional latent variables. These challenges are traditionally tackled by likelihood-free methods that use scientific simulators to generate datasets and reduce them to hand-designed, permutation-invariant summary statistics, often leading to inaccurate inference. In this work, we develop an exchangeable neural network that performs summary statistic-free, likelihood-free inference. Our framework can be applied in a black-box fashion across a variety of simulation-based tasks, both within and outside biology. We demonstrate the power of our approach on the recombination hotspot testing problem, outperforming the state-of-the-art. Jeffrey Chan, Valerio Perrone, Jeffrey P. Spence, Paul A. Jenkins, Sara Mathieson, Yun S. Song |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2017 | Poisson Random Fields for Dynamic Feature ModelsabstractWe present the Wright-Fisher Indian buffet process (WF- IBP), a probabilistic model for time-dependent data assumed to have been generated by an unknown number of latent features. This model is suitable as a prior in Bayesian nonparametric feature allocation models in which the features underlying the observed data exhibit a dependency structure over time. More specifically, we establish a new framework for generating dependent Indian buffet processes, where the Poisson random field model from population genetics is used as a way of constructing dependent beta processes. Inference in the model is complex, and we describe a sophisticated Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm for exact posterior simulation. We apply our construction to develop a nonparametric focused topic model for collections of time-stamped text documents and test it on the full corpus of NIPS papers published from 1987 to 2015. Valerio Perrone, Paul A. Jenkins, Dario Spanò, Yee Whye Teh |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2006 | How Many Transcripts Does It Take to Reconstruct the Splice Graph?
Paul A. Jenkins, Rune B. Lyngsø, Jotun Hein |
WABI | 1 |