Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kristian Lund
dblp:123/2982
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network management and operations · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
real-time model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Formal modeling and analysis of an audio/video protocol: an industrial case study using UPPAAL · RTSS 1997 |
Network management and operations
protocol verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Formal modeling and analysis of an audio/video protocol: an industrial case study using UPPAAL · RTSS 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
timed automata · 0.0UPPAAL · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Formal modeling and analysis of an audio/video protocol: an industrial case study using UPPAALabstractA formal and automatic verification of a real-life protocol is presented. The protocol, about 2800 lines of assembler code, has been used in products from the audio/video company Bang & Olufsen throughout more than a decade, and its purpose is to control the transmission of messages between audio/video components over a single bus. Such communications may collide, and one essential purpose of the protocol is to detect such collisions. The functioning is highly dependent on real-time considerations. Though the protocol was known to be faulty in that messages were lost occasionally, the protocol was too complicated in order for Bang & Olufsen to locate the bug using normal testing. However using the real-time verification tool UPPAAL, an error trace was automatically generated, which caused the detection of "the error" in the implementation. The error was corrected and the correction was automatically proven correct, again using UPPAAL. A future, and more automated, version of the protocol, where this error is fatal, will incorporate the correction. Hence, this work is an elegant demonstration of how model checking has had an impact on practical software development. The effort of modeling this protocol has in addition generated a number of suggestions for enriching the UPPAAL language. Hence, it's also an excellent example of the reverse impact. Klaus Havelund, Arne Skou, Kim G. Larsen, Kristian Lund |
RTSS | 4 |