Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oliver Schwarz

dblp:123/3525 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-3434-5640ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 77% Operating systems · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
information flow control
0.212013
Formal verification of information flow security for a simple arm-based separation kernel · CCS 2013
Systems and software security › information flow control
noninterference
0.212013
Formal verification of information flow security for a simple arm-based separation kernel · CCS 2013
Program verification › code-level verification
machine code verification
0.212013
Formal verification of information flow security for a simple arm-based separation kernel · CCS 2013
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
kernel security
0.012013
Formal verification of information flow security for a simple arm-based separation kernel · CCS 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

HOL4 · 0.3BAP · 0.3ARMv7 model · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Automatic Derivation of Platform Noninterference Properties
Oliver Schwarz, Mads Dam
SEFM1
2013 Formal verification of information flow security for a simple arm-based separation kernel
abstract
A separation kernel simulates a distributed environment using a single physical machine by executing partitions in isolation and appropriately controlling communication among them. We present a formal verification of information flow security for a simple separation kernel for ARMv7. Previous work on information flow kernel security leaves communication to be handled by model-external means, and cannot be used to draw conclusions when there is explicit interaction between partitions. We propose a different approach where communication between partitions is made explicit and the information flow is analyzed in the presence of such a channel. Limiting the kernel functionality as much as meaningfully possible, we accomplish a detailed analysis and verification of the system, proving its correctness at the level of the ARMv7 assembly. As a sanity check we show how the security condition is reduced to noninterference in the special case where no communication takes place. The verification is done in HOL4 taking the Cambridge model of ARM as basis, transferring verification tasks on the actual assembly code to an adaptation of the BAP binary analysis tool developed at CMU.
Mads Dam, Roberto Guanciale, Narges Khakpour, Hamed Nemati, Oliver Schwarz
CCS5
2013 Machine Assisted Proof of ARMv7 Instruction Level Isolation Properties
Narges Khakpour, Oliver Schwarz, Mads Dam
CPP2