Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vladimir Nikishkin

dblp:123/4823 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-0585-8228ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › property testing
distribution testing
0.732017
Near-Optimal Closeness Testing of Discrete Histogram Distributions · ICALP 2017
Testing Identity of Structured Distributions · SODA 2015
Optimal Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Testing Closeness of Structured Distributions · FOCS 2015
Computational complexity
property testing
0.732017
Near-Optimal Closeness Testing of Discrete Histogram Distributions · ICALP 2017
Testing Identity of Structured Distributions · SODA 2015
Optimal Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Testing Closeness of Structured Distributions · FOCS 2015
Computational complexity › property testing › distribution testing
closeness testing
0.522017
Near-Optimal Closeness Testing of Discrete Histogram Distributions · ICALP 2017
Optimal Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Testing Closeness of Structured Distributions · FOCS 2015
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › property testing
distribution testing
0.212015
Testing Identity of Structured Distributions · SODA 2015
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › property testing › distribution testing
identity testing
0.212015
Testing Identity of Structured Distributions · SODA 2015
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.212015
Optimal Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Testing Closeness of Structured Distributions · FOCS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample complexity analysis · 0.4l1 distance testing · 0.4l1 distance · 0.2ak-distance metric · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Near-Optimal Closeness Testing of Discrete Histogram Distributions
abstract
We investigate the problem of testing the equivalence between two discrete histograms. A k-histogram over [n] is a probability distribution that is piecewise constant over some set of k intervals over [n]. Histograms have been extensively studied in computer science and statistics. Given a set of samples from two k-histogram distributions p, q over [n], we want to distinguish (with high probability) between the cases that p = q and ||p ? q||_1 >= epsilon. The main contribution of this paper is a new algorithm for this testing problem and a nearly matching information-theoretic lower bound. Specifically, the sample complexity of our algorithm matches our lower bound up to a logarithmic factor, improving on previous work by polynomial factors in the relevant parameters. Our algorithmic approach applies in a more general setting and yields improved sample upper bounds for testing closeness of other structured distributions as well.
Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane, Vladimir Nikishkin
ICALP3
2015 Optimal Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Testing Closeness of Structured Distributions
abstract
We give a general unified method that can be used for L1closeness testing of a wide range of univariate structured distribution families. More specifically, we design a sample optimal and computationally efficient algorithm for testing the equivalence of two unknown (potentially arbitrary) univariate distributions under the Ak-distance metric: Given sample access to distributions with density functions p, q : I → R, we want to distinguish between the cases that p = q and ∥p - q∥Ak≥ ∈ with probability at least 2/3. We show that for any k ≥ 2, ∈ > 0, the optimal sample complexity of the Ak-closeness testing problem is Θ(max{k4/5/∈6/5, k1/2/∈2}). This is the first o(k) sample algorithm for this problem, and yields new, simple L1 closeness testers, in most cases with optimal sample complexity, for broad classes of structured distributions.
Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane, Vladimir Nikishkin
FOCS3
2015 Testing Identity of Structured Distributions
abstract
We study the question of identity testing for structured distributions. More precisely, given samples from a structured distribution q over [n] and an explicit distribution p over [n], we wish to distinguish whether q = p versus q is at least ε-far from p, in L1 distance. In this work, we present a unified approach that yields new, simple testers, with sample complexity that is information-theoretically optimal, for broad classes of structured distributions, including t-flat distributions, t-modal distributions, log-concave distributions, monotone hazard rate (MHR) distributions, and mixtures thereof.
Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane, Vladimir Nikishkin
SODA3