Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ian Chang

dblp:123/6988 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 87% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
distribution testing
0.712023
HOLMES: Efficient Distribution Testing for Secure Collaborative Learning · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning › collaborative learning
secure collaborative learning
0.712023
HOLMES: Efficient Distribution Testing for Secure Collaborative Learning · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation
0.212023
HOLMES: Efficient Distribution Testing for Secure Collaborative Learning · USENIX Security Symposium 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

secure multiparty computation · 0.7distribution testing · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 HOLMES: Efficient Distribution Testing for Secure Collaborative Learning
Ian Chang, Katerina Sotiraki, Weikeng Chen, Murat Kantarcioglu, Raluca A. Popa
USENIX Security Symposium1
2016 Identifying Absorbing Aerosols Above Clouds From the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager Coupled With NASA A-Train Multiple Sensors
abstract
Geostationary satellite data from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) in conjunction with A-Train data are used to develop an algorithm for detecting biomass-burning smoke aerosols above closed-cell stratocumulus (Sc) clouds. The detection relies on spectral signatures, textural characteristics, and time-dependent spectral variation of SEVIRI data. A-Train data including the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) are used as reference data for the SEVIRI algorithm development. The 15-min repeat cycle of SEVIRI provides the capability for identifying smoke above closed-cell Sc with an OMI aerosol index value exceeding 0.5 and a cloud optical thickness greater than 6 at 0.81 m. The user accuracy of this algorithm is ~49% when using only spectral signature and textural tests. When incorporating the “temporal consistency” tests into the algorithm, the user accuracy increases to ~65%. The producer accuracy is over ~77%, implying that the SEVIRI algorithm generally identifies smoke above clouds when CALIOP also identifies the same feature at the collocated pixel. However, CALIOP has the tendency to underestimate the presence of thin smoke aerosols above liquid clouds during daytime. This algorithm can be used to detect and study the daytime variation of smoke above liquid clouds.
Ian Chang, Sundar A. Christopher
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.1
2010 Modularity of Escherichia coli sRNA regulation revealed by sRNA-target and protein network analysis
abstract
BACKGROUND: sRNAs, which belong to the non-coding RNA family and range from approximately 50 to 400 nucleotides, serve various important gene regulatory roles. Most are believed to be trans-regulating and function by being complementary to their target mRNAs in order to inhibiting translation by ribosome occlusion. Despite this understanding of their functionality, the global properties associated with regulation by sRNAs are not yet understood. Here we use topological analysis of sRNA targets in terms of protein-protein interaction and transcription-regulatory networks in Escherichia coli to shed light on the global correlation between sRNA regulation and cellular control networks. RESULTS: The analysis of sRNA targets in terms of their networks showed that some specific network properties could be identified. In protein-protein interaction network, sRNA targets tend to occupy more central positions (higher closeness centrality, p-val = 0.022) and more cliquish (larger clustering coefficient, p-val = 0.037). The targets of the same sRNA tend to form a network module (shorter characteristic path length, p-val = 0.015; larger density, p-val = 0.019; higher in-degree ratio, p-val = 0.009). Using the transcription-regulatory network, sRNA targets tend to be under multiple regulation (higher indegree, p-val = 0.013) and the targets usually are important to the transfer of regulatory signals (higher betweenness, p-val = 0.012). As was found for the protein-protein interaction network, the targets that are regulated by the same sRNA also tend to be closely knit within the transcription-regulatory network (larger density, p-val = 0.036), and inward interactions between them are greater than the outward interactions (higher in-degree ratio, p-val = 0.023). However, after incorporating information on predicted sRNAs and down-stream targets, the results are not as clear-cut, but the overall network modularity is still evident. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that sRNA targeting tends to show a clustering pattern that is similar to the human microRNA regulation associated with protein-protein interaction network that was observed in a previous study. Namely, the sRNA targets show close interaction and forms a closely knit network module for both the protein-protein interaction and the transcription-regulatory networks. Thus, targets of the same sRNA work in a concerted way toward a specific goal. In addition, in the transcription-regulatory network, sRNA targets act as "multiplexor", accepting regulatory control from multiple sources and acting accordingly. Our results indicate that sRNA targeting shows different properties when compared to the proteins that form cellular networks.
Timothy H. Wu, Ian Chang, Lichieh Julie Chu, Hsuan-Cheng Huang, Wailap V. Ng
BMC Bioinform.2