Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jennifer Corcoran

dblp:123/7664 · also Jennifer Marie Corcoran · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.422015
Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015
Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning: A Summary of Results · ICDM 2013
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
decision tree learning
0.422015
Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015
Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning: A Summary of Results · ICDM 2013
Data mining › structured data mining
spatial data mining
0.422015
Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015
Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning: A Summary of Results · ICDM 2013
Environmental and earth informatics › remote sensing
land cover classification
0.012013
Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning: A Summary of Results · ICDM 2013
Environmental and earth informatics
remote sensing
0.012013
Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning: A Summary of Results · ICDM 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

focal test · 0.5spatial decision tree · 0.3adaptive neighborhood · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning
abstract
Given learning samples from a raster data set, spatial decision tree learning aims to find a decision tree classifier that minimizes classification errors as well as salt-and-pepper noise. The problem has important societal applications such as land cover classification for natural resource management. However, the problem is challenging due to the fact that learning samples show spatial autocorrelation in class labels, instead of being independently identically distributed. Related work relies on local tests (i.e., testing feature information of a location) and cannot adequately model the spatial autocorrelation effect, resulting in salt-and-pepper noise. In contrast, we recently proposed a focal-test-based spatial decision tree (FTSDT), in which the tree traversal direction of a sample is based on both local and focal (neighborhood) information. Preliminary results showed that FTSDT reduces classification errors and salt-and-pepper noise. This paper extends our recent work by introducing a new focal test approach with adaptive neighborhoods that avoids over-smoothing in wedge-shaped areas. We also conduct computational refinement on the FTSDT training algorithm by reusing focal values across candidate thresholds. Theoretical analysis shows that the refined training algorithm is correct and more scalable. Experiment results on real world data sets show that new FTSDT with adaptive neighborhoods improves classification accuracy, and that our computational refinement significantly reduces training time.
Zhe Jiang 0001, Shashi Shekhar 0001, Xun Zhou 0001, Joseph F. Knight, Jennifer Corcoran
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.5
2014 Watershed scale analyses of land cover change in the contributing upland area of mangrove ecosystems
abstract
Mangrove Ecosystems thrive in the tropical transition zones between the land and the sea. These marine ecosystems contribute to the biodiversity of land and ocean habitats at various scales, acting as direct link to biogeochemical cycles of both upland and coastal regions. All of the positive and negative drivers of change of both natural and anthropogenic, within watershed and political boundaries play a role in the health and function of mangroves. As a result, they are among the most rapidly changing landscapes in the Americas; yet, the landscape scale dynamics are not well understood, difficult to measure in cloudy regions, and not operationally monitored at the global scale. This research presents a watershed scale monitoring approach of mangrove ecosystems using datasets that are freely available and techniques that are robust for application at the global scale.
Jennifer Corcoran, Marc Simard, Temilola Fatoyinbo, Melanie Rosenberg
IGARSS1
2013 Focal-Test-Based Spatial Decision Tree Learning: A Summary of Results
abstract
Given a raster spatial framework, as well as training and test sets, the spatial decision tree learning (SDTL) problem aims to minimize classification errors as well as salt-and-pepper noise. The SDTL problem is important due to many societal applications such as land cover classification in remote sensing. However, the SDTL problem is challenging due to the spatial autocorrelation of class labels, and the potentially exponential number of candidate trees. Related work is limited due to the use of local-test-based decision nodes, which can not adequately model spatial autocorrelation during test phase, leading to high salt-and-pepper noise. In contrast, we propose a focal-test-based spatial decision tree (FTSDT) model, where the tree traversal direction for a location is based on not only local but also focal (i.e., neighborhood) properties of the location. Experimental results on real world remote sensing datasets show that the proposed approach reduces salt-and-pepper noise and improves classification accuracy.
Zhe Jiang 0001, Shashi Shekhar 0001, Xun Zhou 0001, Joseph F. Knight, Jennifer Corcoran
ICDM5
2012 Learning spatial decision tree for geographical classification: a summary of results
abstract
Given learning samples from a spatial raster dataset, the geographical classification problem aims to learn a decision tree classifier that minimizes classification errors as well as salt-n-pepper noise. The problem is important in many applications, such as land cover classification in remote sensing and lesion classification in medical diagnosis. However, the problem is challenging due to spatial autocorrelation. Existing decision tree learning algorithms, i.e. ID3, C4.5, CART, produce a lot of salt-n-pepper noise in classification results, due to their assumption that data items are drawn independently from identical distributions. In contrast, we propose a spatial decision tree learning algorithm, which incorporates spatial autocorrelation effect by a new spatial information gain (SIG) measure. The proposed approach is evaluated in a case study on a remote sensing dataset from Chanhassen, MN. Case study results show that the proposed approach outperforms the traditional approach in not only reducing salt-n-pepper noise but also improving classification accuracy.
Zhe Jiang 0001, Shashi Shekhar 0001, Pradeep Mohan, Joseph F. Knight, Jennifer Corcoran
SIGSPATIAL/GIS5