MOTIVATION: The chemical modification of ribonucleotides regulates the structure, stability and interactions of RNAs. Profiling of these modifications using short-read (Illumina) sequencing techniques provides high sensitivity but low-to-medium resolution i.e. modifications cannot be assigned to specific transcript isoforms in regions of sequence overlap. An alternative strategy uses current fluctuations in nanopore-based long read direct RNA sequencing (DRS) to infer the location and identity of nucleotides that differ between two experimental conditions. While highly sensitive, these signal-level analyses require high-quality transcriptome annotations and thus are best suited to the study of model organisms. By contrast, the detection of RNA modifications in microbial organisms which typically have no or low-quality annotations requires an alternative strategy. Here, we demonstrate that signal fluctuations directly influence error rates during base-calling and thus provides an alternative approach for identifying modified nucleotides. RESULTS: DRUMMER (Detection of Ribonucleic acid Modifications Manifested in Error Rates) (i) utilizes a range of statistical tests and background noise correction to identify modified nucleotides with high confidence, (ii) operates with similar sensitivity to signal-level analysis approaches and (iii) correlates very well with orthogonal approaches. Using well-characterized DRS datasets supported by independent meRIP-Seq and miCLIP-Seq datasets we demonstrate that DRUMMER operates with high sensitivity and specificity. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DRUMMER is written in Python 3 and is available as open source in the GitHub repository: https://github.com/DepledgeLab/DRUMMER. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

MOTIVATION: Because of the advantages of RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) over microarrays, it is gaining widespread popularity for highly parallel gene expression analysis. For example, RNA-Seq is expected to be able to provide accurate identification and quantification of full-length splice forms. A number of informatics packages have been developed for this purpose, but short reads make it a difficult problem in principle. Sequencing error and polymorphisms add further complications. It has become necessary to perform studies to determine which algorithms perform best and which if any algorithms perform adequately. However, there is a dearth of independent and unbiased benchmarking studies. Here we take an approach using both simulated and experimental benchmark data to evaluate their accuracy. RESULTS: We conclude that most methods are inaccurate even using idealized data, and that no method is highly accurate once multiple splice forms, polymorphisms, intron signal, sequencing errors, alignment errors, annotation errors and other complicating factors are present. These results point to the pressing need for further algorithm development. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Simulated datasets and other supporting information can be found at http://bioinf.itmat.upenn.edu/BEERS/bp2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.