Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jens Preiss

dblp:124/2093 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video coding · 42% Image and video processing · 41% Computational photography and imaging · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding
image quality assessment
0.422014
Color-Image Quality Assessment: From Prediction to Optimization · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2014
Image-Difference Prediction: From Grayscale to Color · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013
Image and video processing
color image processing
0.212013
Image-Difference Prediction: From Grayscale to Color · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013
Computational photography and imaging › color science › color management
gamut mapping evaluation
0.212013
Image-Difference Prediction: From Grayscale to Color · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013
Image and video coding › image quality assessment › perceptual image quality assessment
perceptual quality prediction
0.112014
Color-Image Quality Assessment: From Prediction to Optimization · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2014
Image and video processing
perceptual image processing
0.012013
Image-Difference Prediction: From Grayscale to Color · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

objective function optimization · 0.2color-image-difference metric · 0.2image normalization · 0.2feature extraction · 0.2feature combination · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Color-Image Quality Assessment: From Prediction to Optimization
abstract
While image-difference metrics show good prediction performance on visual data, they often yield artifact-contaminated results if used as objective functions for optimizing complex image-processing tasks. We investigate in this regard the recently proposed color-image-difference (CID) metric particularly developed for predicting gamut-mapping distortions. We present an algorithm for optimizing gamut mapping employing the CID metric as the objective function. Resulting images contain various visual artifacts, which are addressed by multiple modifications yielding the improved color-image-difference (iCID) metric. The iCID-based optimizations are free from artifacts and retain contrast, structure, and color of the original image to a great extent. Furthermore, the prediction performance on visual data is improved by the modifications.
Jens Preiss, Felipe Fernandes, Philipp Urban
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
2013 Image-Difference Prediction: From Grayscale to Color
abstract
Existing image-difference measures show excellent accuracy in predicting distortions, such as lossy compression, noise, and blur. Their performance on certain other distortions could be improved; one example of this is gamut mapping. This is partly because they either do not interpret chromatic information correctly or they ignore it entirely. We present an image-difference framework that comprises image normalization, feature extraction, and feature combination. Based on this framework, we create image-difference measures by selecting specific implementations for each of the steps. Particular emphasis is placed on using color information to improve the assessment of gamut-mapped images. Our best image-difference measure shows significantly higher prediction accuracy on a gamut-mapping dataset than all other evaluated measures.
Ingmar Lissner, Jens Preiss, Philipp Urban, Matthias Scheller Lichtenauer, Peter Zolliker
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2