Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sandro Bauer

dblp:124/2617 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 95% Web and social media mining · 5%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
content selection
0.212016
Unsupervised Timeline Generation for Wikipedia History Articles · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event extraction
event detection
0.212016
Unsupervised Timeline Generation for Wikipedia History Articles · EMNLP 2016
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.212016
Where Can I Buy a Boulder?: Searching for Offline Retail Locations · WWW 2016
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.212016
Where Can I Buy a Boulder?: Searching for Offline Retail Locations · WWW 2016
Information retrieval
ranking
0.212016
Where Can I Buy a Boulder?: Searching for Offline Retail Locations · WWW 2016
Information retrieval
search engines
0.212016
Where Can I Buy a Boulder?: Searching for Offline Retail Locations · WWW 2016
Information retrieval
text summarization
0.212016
Unsupervised Timeline Generation for Wikipedia History Articles · EMNLP 2016
Information retrieval › text summarization
timeline generation
0.212016
Unsupervised Timeline Generation for Wikipedia History Articles · EMNLP 2016
Web and social media mining › user-generated content
wikipedia
0.112016
Unsupervised Timeline Generation for Wikipedia History Articles · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal analysis · 0.5lexical cues · 0.5ontology construction · 0.2learning to rank · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Unsupervised Timeline Generation for Wikipedia History Articles
abstract
This paper presents a generic approach to content selection for creating timelines from individual history articles for which no external information about the same topic is available. This scenario is in contrast to existing works on timeline generation, which require the presence of a large corpus of news articles. To identify salient events in a given history article, we exploit lexical cues about the article's subject area, as well as time expressions that are syntactically attached to an event word. We also test different methods of ensuring timeline coverage of the entire historical time span described. Our best-performing method outperforms a new unsupervised base-line and an improved version of an existing supervised approach. We see our work as a step towards more semantically motivated approaches to single-document summarisation.
Sandro Bauer, Simone Teufel
EMNLP1
2016 Where Can I Buy a Boulder?: Searching for Offline Retail Locations
abstract
People commonly need to purchase things in person, from large garden supplies to home decor. Although modern search systems are very effective at finding online products, little research attention has been paid to helping users find places that sell a specific product offline. For instance, users searching for an apron are not typically directed to a nearby kitchen store by a standard search engine. In this paper, we investigate "where can I buy"-style queries related to in-person purchases of products and services. Answering these queries is challenging since little is known about the range of products sold in many stores, especially those which are smaller in size. To better understand this class of queries, we first present an in-depth analysis of typical offline purchase needs as observed by a major search engine, producing an ontology of such needs. We then propose ranking features for this new problem, and learn a ranking function that returns stores most likely to sell a queried item or service, even if there is very little information available online about some of the stores. Our final contribution is a new evaluation framework that combines distance with store relevance in measuring the effectiveness of such a search system. We evaluate our method using this approach and show that it outperforms a modern web search engine.
Sandro Bauer, Filip Radlinski, Ryen W. White
WWW1
2014 Learning a Theory of Marriage (and Other Relations) from a Web Corpus
Sandro Bauer, Stephen Clark, Laura Rimell, Thore Graepel
ECIR1