Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wentao Mo

dblp:124/3011 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Vision and language · 33% 3D vision · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
2.432025
Advancing 3D Scene Understanding with MV-ScanQA Multi-View Reasoning Evaluation and TripAlign Pre-training Dataset · ACM Multimedia 2025
3D Vision and Language Pretraining with Large-Scale Synthetic Data · IJCAI 2024
Bridging the Gap between 2D and 3D Visual Question Answering: A Fusion Approach for 3D VQA · AAAI 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › 3d vision and language
3d question answering
1.022025
Bridging the Gap between 2D and 3D Visual Question Answering: A Fusion Approach for 3D VQA · AAAI 2024
Advancing 3D Scene Understanding with MV-ScanQA Multi-View Reasoning Evaluation and TripAlign Pre-training Dataset · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
1.012026
TWINFUZZ: Dual-Model Fuzzing for Robustness Generalization in Deep Learning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › robust learning
robust generalization
1.012026
TWINFUZZ: Dual-Model Fuzzing for Robustness Generalization in Deep Learning · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
1.012026
Transferability of Adversarial Attacks in Video-based MLLMs: A Cross-modal Image-to-Video Approach · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
transferable adversarial attack
1.012026
Transferability of Adversarial Attacks in Video-based MLLMs: A Cross-modal Image-to-Video Approach · AAAI 2026
Software testing
fuzzing
1.012026
TWINFUZZ: Dual-Model Fuzzing for Robustness Generalization in Deep Learning · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
multi-view reasoning
0.912025
Advancing 3D Scene Understanding with MV-ScanQA Multi-View Reasoning Evaluation and TripAlign Pre-training Dataset · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
3d vision and language
0.812024
3D Vision and Language Pretraining with Large-Scale Synthetic Data · IJCAI 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › 3d vision and language
3d vision-language pre-training
0.812024
3D Vision and Language Pretraining with Large-Scale Synthetic Data · IJCAI 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.312026
Transferability of Adversarial Attacks in Video-based MLLMs: A Cross-modal Image-to-Video Approach · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering
0.312026
Transferability of Adversarial Attacks in Video-based MLLMs: A Cross-modal Image-to-Video Approach · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.212024
Bridging the Gap between 2D and 3D Visual Question Answering: A Fusion Approach for 3D VQA · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

surrogate model · 2.0perturbation propagation · 2.0lagrangian information bottleneck · 2.0entropy-based mutation · 2.0dual-model fuzzing · 2.0agreement mining · 2.0adversarial perturbation · 2.0pre-training dataset construction · 0.9twin-transformer fusion · 0.8question-conditional 2d view selection · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 TWINFUZZ: Dual-Model Fuzzing for Robustness Generalization in Deep Learning
abstract
Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications such as face recognition, autonomous driving, and medical diagnosis. Despite their impressive accuracy, they remain vulnerable to adversarial examples - subtle perturbations that can cause incorrect predictions, i.e., the robustness issues. While adversarial training improves robustness against known attacks, it often fails to generalize to unseen or stronger threats, revealing a critical gap in robustness generalization. In this work, we propose a dual-model fuzzing framework to enhance generalized robustness in DL models. Central to our method is a lightweight metric, the Lagrangian Information Bottleneck (LIB), which guides entropy-based mutation toward semantically meaningful and high-risk regions of the input space. The executor uses a resistant model and a more error-prone vulnerable model; their prediction consistency forms the basis of agreement mining, a label-free oracle for isolating decision-boundary samples. To ensure fuzzing effectiveness, we further introduce a task-driven seed selection strategy (e.g., SSIM for vision) that filters out low-quality inputs. We implement a prototype, TWINFUZZ, and evaluate it on six benchmark datasets and nine DL models. Compared with state-of-the-art testing approaches, TWINFUZZ achieves superior improvements in both training-specific and generalized robustness.
Enze Dai, Wentao Mo, Kun Hu 0008, Xiaogang Zhu 0001, Xi Xiao 0001, Sheng Wen, Shaohua Wang 0002, Yang Xiang 0001
AAAI2
2026 Transferability of Adversarial Attacks in Video-based MLLMs: A Cross-modal Image-to-Video Approach
abstract
Video-based multimodal large language models (V-MLLMs) have shown vulnerability to adversarial examples in video-text multimodal tasks. However, the transferability of adversarial videos to unseen models—a common and practical real-world scenario—remains unexplored. In this paper, we pioneer an investigation into the transferability of adversarial video samples across V-MLLMs. We find that existing adversarial attack methods face significant limitations when applied in black-box settings for V-MLLMs, which we attribute to the following shortcomings: (1) lacking generalization in perturbing video features, (2) focusing only on sparse key-frames, and (3) failing to integrate multimodal information. To address these limitations and deepen the understanding of V-MLLM vulnerabilities in black-box scenarios, we introduce the Image-to-Video MLLM (I2V-MLLM) attack. In I2V-MLLM, we utilize an image-based multimodal large language model (I-MLLM) as a surrogate model to craft adversarial video samples. Multimodal interactions and spatiotemporal information are integrated to disrupt video representations within the latent space, improving adversarial transferability. Additionally, a perturbation propagation technique is introduced to handle different unknown frame sampling strategies. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can generate adversarial examples that exhibit strong transferability across different V-MLLMs on multiple video-text multimodal tasks. Compared to white-box attacks on these models, our black-box attacks (using BLIP-2 as a surrogate model) achieve competitive performance, with average attack success rate (AASR) of 57.98% on MSVD-QA and 58.26% on MSRVTT-QA for Zero-Shot VideoQA tasks, respectively.
Linhao Huang, Wentao Mo, Xi Xiao 0001, Bo Han 0003, Feng Zheng 0001
AAAI4
2025 Advancing 3D Scene Understanding with MV-ScanQA Multi-View Reasoning Evaluation and TripAlign Pre-training Dataset
Wentao Mo, Qingchao Chen, Yuxin Peng 0001, Siyuan Huang 0001, Yang Liu 0105
ACM Multimedia1
2024 Bridging the Gap between 2D and 3D Visual Question Answering: A Fusion Approach for 3D VQA
abstract
In 3D Visual Question Answering (3D VQA), the scarcity of fully annotated data and limited visual content diversity hampers the generalization to novel scenes and 3D concepts (e.g., only around 800 scenes are utilized in ScanQA and SQA dataset). Current approaches resort supplement 3D reasoning with 2D information. However, these methods face challenges: either they use top-down 2D views that introduce overly complex and sometimes question-irrelevant visual clues, or they rely on globally aggregated scene/image-level representations from 2D VLMs, losing the fine-grained vision-language correlations. To overcome these limitations, our approach utilizes question-conditional 2D view selection procedure, pinpointing semantically relevant 2D inputs for crucial visual clues. We then integrate this 2D knowledge into the 3D-VQA system via a two-branch Transformer structure. This structure, featuring a Twin-Transformer design, compactly combines 2D and 3D modalities and captures fine-grained correlations between modalities, allowing them mutually augmenting each other. Integrating proposed mechanisms above, we present BridgeQA, that offers a fresh perspective on multi-modal transformer-based architectures for 3D-VQA. Experiments validate that BridgeQA achieves state-of-the-art on 3D-VQA datasets and significantly outperforms existing solutions. Code is available at https://github.com/matthewdm0816/BridgeQA.
Wentao Mo, Yang Liu 0105
AAAI1
2024 3D Vision and Language Pretraining with Large-Scale Synthetic Data
Dejie Yang, Wentao Mo, Qingchao Chen, Siyuan Huang 0001, Yang Liu 0105
IJCAI3