Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dania Abed Rabbou

dblp:124/4009 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Distributed and cloud data management · 50% Graph data management · 25% Query processing and optimization · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed and cloud data management
distributed query processing
0.212015
DREAM: Distributed RDF Engine with Adaptive Query Planner and Minimal Communication · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Distributed and cloud data management
distributed RDF processing
0.212015
DREAM: Distributed RDF Engine with Adaptive Query Planner and Minimal Communication · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Query processing and optimization
query planning
0.212015
DREAM: Distributed RDF Engine with Adaptive Query Planner and Minimal Communication · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Graph data management
RDF data management
0.212015
DREAM: Distributed RDF Engine with Adaptive Query Planner and Minimal Communication · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 DREAM: Distributed RDF Engine with Adaptive Query Planner and Minimal Communication
abstract
The Resource Description Framework (RDF) and SPARQL query language are gaining wide popularity and acceptance. In this paper, we present DREAM, a distributed and adaptive RDF system. As opposed to existing RDF systems, DREAM avoids partitioning RDF datasets and partitions only SPARQL queries. By not partitioning datasets, DREAM offers a general paradigm for different types of pattern matching queries, and entirely averts intermediate data shuffling (only auxiliary data are shuffled). Besides, by partitioning queries, DREAM presents an adaptive scheme, which automatically runs queries on various numbers of machines depending on their complexities. Hence, in essence DREAM combines the advantages of the state-of-the-art centralized and distributed RDF systems, whereby data communication is avoided and cluster resources are aggregated. Likewise, it precludes their disadvantages, wherein system resources are limited and communication overhead is typically hindering. DREAM achieves all its goals via employing a novel graph-based, rule-oriented query planner and a new cost model. We implemented DREAM and conducted comprehensive experiments on a private cluster and on the Amazon EC2 platform. Results show that DREAM can significantly outperform three related popular RDF systems.
Mohammad Hammoud, Dania Abed Rabbou, Reza Nouri, Amin Beheshti, Sherif Sakr
Proc. VLDB Endow.2