VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Savu
dblp:124/6592
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 67% Approximation and online algorithms · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
banach space |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Lebesgue-Type Inequalities for Greedy Approximation in Banach Spaces · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2013 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › combinatorial approximation algorithms
greedy approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Lebesgue-Type Inequalities for Greedy Approximation in Banach Spaces · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2013 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
sparse approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Lebesgue-Type Inequalities for Greedy Approximation in Banach Spaces · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quasi-orthogonal greedy algorithm · 0.2orthogonal matching pursuit · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Lebesgue-Type Inequalities for Greedy Approximation in Banach SpacesabstractWe study sparse representations and sparse approximations with respect to incoherent dictionaries. We address the problem of designing and analyzing greedy methods of approximation. A key question in this regard is: How to measure efficiency of a specific algorithm? Answering this question, we prove the Lebesgue-type inequalities for algorithms under consideration. A very important new ingredient of the paper is that we perform our analysis in a Banach space instead of a Hilbert space. It is known that in many numerical problems, users are satisfied with a Hilbert space setting and do not consider a more general setting in a Banach space. There are known arguments that justify interest in Banach spaces. In this paper, we give one more argument in favor of consideration of greedy approximation in Banach spaces. We introduce a concept of$M$-coherent dictionary in a Banach space which is a generalization of the corresponding concept in a Hilbert space. We analyze the quasi-orthogonal greedy algorithm (QOGA), which is a generalization of the orthogonal greedy algorithm (orthogonal matching pursuit) for Banach spaces. It is known that the QOGA recovers exactly$S$-sparse signals after$S$iterations provided$S< (1+1/M)/2$. This result is well known for the orthogonal greedy algorithm in Hilbert spaces. The following question is of great importance: Are there dictionaries in$\BBR^{n}$such that their coherence in$\ell_{p}^{n}$is less than their coherence in$\ell_{2}^{n}$for some$p\in (1,\infty)$? We show that the answer to the above question is “yes.” Thus, for such dictionaries, replacing the Hilbert space$\ell_{2}^{n}$by a Banach space$\ell_{p}^{n}$, we improve an upper bound for sparsity that guarantees an exact recovery of a signal. Daniel Savu, Vladimir N. Temlyakov |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |