Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Namit Katariya

dblp:124/7169 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 38% Language models and text generation · 38% Learning theory · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 86% Machine learning and data management · 14%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
domain-adaptive pre-training
0.412020
Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs · KDD 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
question matching
0.412020
Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs · KDD 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
accuracy estimation
0.112012
Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets · ICDM 2012
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
classifier evaluation
0.112012
Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets · ICDM 2012
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.112020
Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs · KDD 2020
Information retrieval › similarity measure
semantic similarity
0.112020
Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs · KDD 2020
Machine learning and data management
active learning
0.012012
Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets · ICDM 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pretrained neural network · 0.9double fine-tuning · 0.9stratified sampling · 0.3importance sampling · 0.3hashing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs
abstract
People increasingly search online for answers to their medical questions but the rate at which medical questions are asked online significantly exceeds the capacity of qualified people to answer them. This leaves many questions unanswered or inadequately answered. Many of these questions are not unique, and reliable identification of similar questions would enable more efficient and effective question answering schema. COVID-19 has only exacerbated this problem. Almost every government agency and healthcare organization has tried to meet the informational need of users by building online FAQs, but there is no way for people to ask their question and know if it is answered on one of these pages. While many research efforts have focused on the problem of general question similarity, these approaches do not generalize well to domains that require expert knowledge to determine semantic similarity, such as the medical domain. In this paper, we show how a double fine-tuning approach of pretraining a neural network on medical question-answer pairs followed by fine-tuning on medical question-question pairs is a particularly useful intermediate task for the ultimate goal of determining medical question similarity. While other pretraining tasks yield an accuracy below 78.7% on this task, our model achieves an accuracy of 82.6% with the same number of training examples, an accuracy of 80.0% with a much smaller training set, and an accuracy of 84.5% when the full corpus of medical question-answer data is used. We also describe a currently live system that uses the trained model to match user questions to COVID-related FAQs.
Clara McCreery, Namit Katariya, Anitha Kannan, Manish Chablani, Xavier Amatriain
KDD2
2012 Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets
abstract
The goal of this work is to estimate the accuracy of a classifier on a large unlabeled dataset based on a small labeled set and a human labeler. We seek to estimate accuracy and select instances for labeling in a loop via a continuously refined stratified sampling strategy. For stratifying data we develop a novel strategy of learning r bit hash functions to preserve similarity in accuracy values. We show that our algorithm provides better accuracy estimates than existing methods for learning distance preserving hash functions. Experiments on a wide spectrum of real datasets show that our estimates achieve between 15% and 62% relative reduction in error compared to existing approaches. We show how to perform stratified sampling on unlabeled data that is so large that in an interactive setting even a single sequential scan is impractical. We present an optimal algorithm for performing importance sampling on a static index over the data that achieves close to exact estimates while reading three orders of magnitude less data.
Namit Katariya, Arun Shankar Iyer, Sunita Sarawagi
ICDM1