Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Namit Katariya
dblp:124/7169
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 38% Language models and text generation · 38% Learning theory · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 86% Machine learning and data management · 14% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
domain-adaptive pre-training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs · KDD 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
question matching |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
accuracy estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets · ICDM 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
classifier evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets · ICDM 2012 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs · KDD 2020 |
Information retrieval › similarity measure
semantic similarity |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning and data management
active learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets · ICDM 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pretrained neural network · 0.9double fine-tuning · 0.9stratified sampling · 0.3importance sampling · 0.3hashing · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQsabstractPeople increasingly search online for answers to their medical questions but the rate at which medical questions are asked online significantly exceeds the capacity of qualified people to answer them. This leaves many questions unanswered or inadequately answered. Many of these questions are not unique, and reliable identification of similar questions would enable more efficient and effective question answering schema. COVID-19 has only exacerbated this problem. Almost every government agency and healthcare organization has tried to meet the informational need of users by building online FAQs, but there is no way for people to ask their question and know if it is answered on one of these pages. While many research efforts have focused on the problem of general question similarity, these approaches do not generalize well to domains that require expert knowledge to determine semantic similarity, such as the medical domain. In this paper, we show how a double fine-tuning approach of pretraining a neural network on medical question-answer pairs followed by fine-tuning on medical question-question pairs is a particularly useful intermediate task for the ultimate goal of determining medical question similarity. While other pretraining tasks yield an accuracy below 78.7% on this task, our model achieves an accuracy of 82.6% with the same number of training examples, an accuracy of 80.0% with a much smaller training set, and an accuracy of 84.5% when the full corpus of medical question-answer data is used. We also describe a currently live system that uses the trained model to match user questions to COVID-related FAQs. Clara McCreery, Namit Katariya, Anitha Kannan, Manish Chablani, Xavier Amatriain |
KDD | 2 |
| 2012 | Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large DatasetsabstractThe goal of this work is to estimate the accuracy of a classifier on a large unlabeled dataset based on a small labeled set and a human labeler. We seek to estimate accuracy and select instances for labeling in a loop via a continuously refined stratified sampling strategy. For stratifying data we develop a novel strategy of learning r bit hash functions to preserve similarity in accuracy values. We show that our algorithm provides better accuracy estimates than existing methods for learning distance preserving hash functions. Experiments on a wide spectrum of real datasets show that our estimates achieve between 15% and 62% relative reduction in error compared to existing approaches. We show how to perform stratified sampling on unlabeled data that is so large that in an interactive setting even a single sequential scan is impractical. We present an optimal algorithm for performing importance sampling on a static index over the data that achieves close to exact estimates while reading three orders of magnitude less data. Namit Katariya, Arun Shankar Iyer, Sunita Sarawagi |
ICDM | 1 |