VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Niranjan A. Subrahmanya
dblp:124/7231 · also Niranjan Addada Subrahmanya
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 26% Deep learning architectures and training · 26% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Multi-scale Graphical Models for Spatio-Temporal Processes · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
multi-scale modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Multi-scale Graphical Models for Spatio-Temporal Processes · NIPS 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
brain network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Identification of Recurrent Patterns in the Activation of Brain Networks · NIPS 2012 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Identification of Recurrent Patterns in the Activation of Brain Networks · NIPS 2012 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Granger Causality for Time-Series Anomaly Detection · ICDM 2012 |
Data mining › causal inference › causal modeling
causal discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Granger Causality for Time-Series Anomaly Detection · ICDM 2012 |
Data mining › causal inference › causal modeling › causal discovery
granger causality |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Granger Causality for Time-Series Anomaly Detection · ICDM 2012 |
Data mining
pattern recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Identification of Recurrent Patterns in the Activation of Brain Networks · NIPS 2012 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
time series anomaly detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Granger Causality for Time-Series Anomaly Detection · ICDM 2012 |
Data mining › clustering
unsupervised clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Identification of Recurrent Patterns in the Activation of Brain Networks · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Sparse Multiple Kernel Learning for Signal Processing Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel learning
multiple kernel learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Sparse Multiple Kernel Learning for Signal Processing Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
sparse learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Sparse Multiple Kernel Learning for Signal Processing Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Sparse Multiple Kernel Learning for Signal Processing Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graphical model · 0.3transportation distance metric · 0.3spherical relaxation · 0.3clustering · 0.3l1-regularized learning · 0.1kernel trick · 0.1iterative learning · 0.1concave penalty · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Multi-scale Graphical Models for Spatio-Temporal Processes
Firdaus Janoos, Huseyin Denli, Niranjan A. Subrahmanya |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2013 | A data-based framework for fault detection and diagnostics of non-linear systems with partial state measurement
Niranjan A. Subrahmanya, Yung C. Shin |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2013 | Cold Start Approach for Data-Driven Fault DetectionabstractA typical assumption in supervised fault detection is that abundant historical data are available prior to model learning, where all types of faults have already been observed at least once. This assumption is likely to be violated in practical settings as new fault types can emerge over time. In this paper we study this often overlooked cold start learning problem in data-driven fault detection, where in the beginning only normal operation data are available and faulty operation data become available as the faults occur. We explored how to leverage strengths of unsupervised and supervised approaches to build a model capable of detecting faults even if none are still observed, and of improving over time, as new fault types are observed. The proposed framework was evaluated on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman Process data. The proposed fusion model performed better on both unseen and seen faults than the stand-alone unsupervised and supervised models. Mihajlo Grbovic, Weichang Li, Niranjan A. Subrahmanya, Adam K. Usadi, Slobodan Vucetic |
IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics | 3 |
| 2012 | Granger Causality for Time-Series Anomaly DetectionabstractRecent developments in industrial systems provide us with a large amount of time series data from sensors, logs, system settings and physical measurements, etc. These data are extremely valuable for providing insights about the complex systems and could be used to detect anomalies at early stages. However, the special characteristics of these time series data, such as high dimensions and complex dependencies between variables, as well as its massive volume, pose great challenges to existing anomaly detection algorithms. In this paper, we propose Granger graphical models as an effective and scalable approach for anomaly detection whose results can be readily interpreted. Specifically, Granger graphical models are a family of graphical models that exploit the temporal dependencies between variables by applying L1-regularized learning to Granger causality. Our goal is to efficiently compute a robust "correlation anomaly" score for each variable via Granger graphical models that can provide insights on the possible reasons of anomalies. We evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms on both synthetic and application datasets. The results show the proposed algorithm achieves significantly better performance than other baseline algorithms and is scalable for large-scale applications. Huida Qiu, Yan Liu 0002, Niranjan A. Subrahmanya, Weichang Li |
ICDM | 3 |
| 2012 | Identification of Recurrent Patterns in the Activation of Brain NetworksabstractIdentifying patterns from the neuroimaging recordings of brain activity related to the unobservable psychological or mental state of an individual can be treated as a unsupervised pattern recognition problem. The main challenges, however, for such an analysis of fMRI data are: a) defining a physiologically meaningful feature-space for representing the spatial patterns across time; b) dealing with the high-dimensionality of the data; and c) robustness to the various artifacts and confounds in the fMRI time-series. In this paper, we present a network-aware feature-space to represent the states of a general network, that enables comparing and clustering such states in a manner that is a) meaningful in terms of the network connectivity structure; b)computationally efficient; c) low-dimensional; and d) relatively robust to structured and random noise artifacts. This feature-space is obtained from a spherical relaxation of the transportation distance metric which measures the cost of transporting ``mass'' over the network to transform one function into another. Through theoretical and empirical assessments, we demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the approximation, especially for large problems. While the application presented here is for identifying distinct brain activity patterns from fMRI, this feature-space can be applied to the problem of identifying recurring patterns and detecting outliers in measurements on many different types of networks, including sensor, control and social networks. Firdaus Janoos, Weichang Li, Niranjan A. Subrahmanya, István Ákos Mórocz, William M. Wells III |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2010 | Constructive training of recurrent neural networks using hybrid optimization
Niranjan A. Subrahmanya, Yung C. Shin |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2010 | Sparse Multiple Kernel Learning for Signal Processing ApplicationsabstractIn many signal processing applications, grouping of features during model development and the selection of a small number of relevant groups can be useful to improve the interpretability of the learned parameters. While a lot of work based on linear models has been reported to solve this problem, in the last few years, multiple kernel learning has come up as a candidate to solve this problem in nonlinear models. Since all of the multiple kernel learning algorithms to date use convex primal problem formulations, the kernel weights selected by these algorithms are not strictly the sparsest possible solution. The main reason for using a convex primal formulation is that efficient implementations of kernel-based methods invariably rely on solving the dual problem. This work proposes the use of an additional log-based concave penalty term in the primal problem to induce sparsity in terms of groups of parameters. A generalized iterative learning algorithm, which can be used with a linear combination of this concave penalty term with other penalty terms, is given for model parameter estimation in the primal space. It is then shown that a natural extension of the method to nonlinear models using the "kernel trick" results in a new algorithm, called Sparse Multiple Kernel Learning (SMKL), which generalizes group-feature selection to kernel selection. SMKL is capable of exploiting existing efficient single kernel algorithms while providing a sparser solution in terms of the number of kernels used as compared to the existing multiple kernel learning framework. A number of signal processing examples based on the use of mass spectra for cancer detection, hyperspectral imagery for land cover classification, and NIR spectra from wheat, fescue grass, and diesel are given to highlight the ability of SMKL to achieve a very high accuracy with a very few kernels. Niranjan A. Subrahmanya, Yung C. Shin |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |