VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eric C. Hall
dblp:125/2055
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-7948-3559ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 31% Learning theory · 26% Graph learning · 22% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
generalized linear model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph inference
network structure inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › sample complexity
sample complexity bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical guarantees |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
dynamic network structure |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Tracking Dynamic Point Processes on Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process › temporal point process › hawkes process
multivariate hawkes process |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Tracking Dynamic Point Processes on Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Tracking Dynamic Point Processes on Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Dynamical Models and tracking regret in online convex programming · ICML (1) 2013 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Dynamical Models and tracking regret in online convex programming · ICML (1) 2013 |
Mathematical optimization
online optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Dynamical Models and tracking regret in online convex programming · ICML (1) 2013 |
Machine learning and data management
online learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Tracking Dynamic Point Processes on Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
dynamic modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Dynamical Models and tracking regret in online convex programming · ICML (1) 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret bounds · 0.5online learning · 0.5sparsity-regularized maximum likelihood · 0.4martingale concentration inequality · 0.4empirical process theory · 0.4online convex programming · 0.3dynamic mirror descent · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Learning High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Autoregressive ModelsabstractVector autoregressive models characterize a variety of time series in which linear combinations of current and past observations can be used to accurately predict future observations. For instance, each element of an observation vector could correspond to a different node in a network, and the parameters of an autoregressive model would correspond to the impact of the network structure on the time series evolution. Often these models are used successfully in practice to learn the structure of social, epidemiological, financial, or biological neural networks. However, little is known about statistical guarantees on estimates of such models in non-Gaussian settings. This paper addresses the inference of the autoregressive parameters and associated network structure within a generalized linear model framework that includes Poisson and Bernoulli autoregressive processes. At the heart of this analysis is a sparsity-regularized maximum likelihood estimator. While sparsity-regularization is well-studied in the statistics and machine learning communities, those analysis methods cannot be applied to autoregressive generalized linear models because of the correlations and potential heteroscedasticity inherent in the observations. Sample complexity bounds are derived using a combination of martingale concentration inequalities and modern empirical process techniques for dependent random variables. These bounds, which are supported by several simulation studies, characterize the impact of various network parameters on estimator performance. Eric C. Hall, Garvesh Raskutti, Rebecca Willett |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2016 | Tracking Dynamic Point Processes on NetworksabstractCascading chains of events are a salient feature of many real-world social, biological, and financial networks. In social networks, social reciprocity accounts for retaliations in gang interactions, proxy wars in nation-state conflicts, or the Internet memes shared via social media. Neuron spikes stimulate or inhibit spike activity in other neurons. Stock market shocks can trigger a contagion of volatility throughout a financial network. In these and other examples, only individual events associated with network nodes are observed, usually without the knowledge of the underlying dynamic relationships between nodes. This paper addresses the challenge of tracking how events within such networks stimulate or influence future events. The proposed approach is an online learning framework well-suited to streaming data, using a multivariate Hawkes point process model to encapsulate autoregressive features of observed events within the social network. Recent work on online learning in dynamic environments is leveraged not only to exploit the dynamics within the underlying network, but also to track the network structure as it evolves. Regret bounds and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method performs nearly as well as an oracle or batch algorithm. Eric C. Hall, Rebecca Willett |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2013 | Foreground and background reconstruction in poisson videoabstractImage foreground and background separation is an essential step in a variety of image processing, video analysis, and computer vision tasks. Typically, these methods accept streaming video data, compute an estimate of the background, and subtract this from the observed frames to generate a foreground scene. While such methods are very effective in high SNR regimes, they face serious limitations in low-light settings occurring in night vision surveillance and astronomy. Existing methods cannot be easily modified to yield good results. Therefore, new methods must be created to deal with the low light setting. This paper specifically addresses the problem of foreground and background separation and reconstruction in the case of Poisson distributed observations. The proposed approach builds upon recent advances in both the online learning community and sparse reconstruction methods for Poisson images. To aid in the reconstruction and separation tasks, the method learns and incorporates the dynamics of objects in both the background and foreground in real time. Eric C. Hall, Rebecca Willett |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2013 | Dynamical Models and tracking regret in online convex programmingabstractThis paper describes a new online convex optimization method which incorporates a family of candidate dynamical models and establishes novel tracking regret bounds that scale with comparator’s deviation from the best dynamical model in this family. Previous online optimization methods are designed to have a total accumulated loss comparable to that of the best comparator sequence, and existing tracking or shifting regret bounds scale with the overall variation of the comparator sequence. In many practical scenarios, however, the environment is nonstationary and comparator sequences with small variation are quite weak, resulting in large losses. The proposed dynamic mirror descent method, in contrast, can yield low regret relative to highly variable comparator sequences by both tracking the best dynamical model and forming predictions based on that model. This concept is demonstrated empirically in the context of sequential compressive observations of a dynamic scene and tracking a dynamic social network. Eric C. Hall, Rebecca Willett |
ICML (1) | 1 |