VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marius Pachitariu
dblp:125/2296
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7106-814XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 47% Generative modeling · 41% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 12% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis |
0.3 | 2 | 2016 | Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort · NIPS 2016 Recurrent linear models of simultaneously-recorded neural populations · NIPS 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike sorting |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Extracting regions of interest from biological images with convolutional sparse block coding · NIPS 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
latent dynamics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Recurrent linear models of simultaneously-recorded neural populations · NIPS 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural population dynamics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Recurrent linear models of simultaneously-recorded neural populations · NIPS 2013 |
Image and video processing › biomedical image analysis
biological image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Extracting regions of interest from biological images with convolutional sparse block coding · NIPS 2013 |
Image and video processing › sparse representation
convolutional sparse coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Extracting regions of interest from biological images with convolutional sparse block coding · NIPS 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning visual motion in recurrent neural networks · NIPS 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › sensory processing
visual motion processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning visual motion in recurrent neural networks · NIPS 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
electrophysiology |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort · NIPS 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural response modeling
neural spike train modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Recurrent linear models of simultaneously-recorded neural populations · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Learning visual motion in recurrent neural networks · NIPS 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convolutional matching pursuit · 0.3K-SVD · 0.3recurrent neural network · 0.3approximate inference · 0.3template matching · 0.2clustering · 0.2GPU optimization · 0.2kalman filter · 0.2generalized linear model · 0.2factor analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Structured random receptive fields enable informative sensory encodingsabstractBrains must represent the outside world so that animals survive and thrive. In early sensory systems, neural populations have diverse receptive fields structured to detect important features in inputs, yet significant variability has been ignored in classical models of sensory neurons. We model neuronal receptive fields as random, variable samples from parameterized distributions and demonstrate this model in two sensory modalities using data from insect mechanosensors and mammalian primary visual cortex. Our approach leads to a significant theoretical connection between the foundational concepts of receptive fields and random features, a leading theory for understanding artificial neural networks. The modeled neurons perform a randomized wavelet transform on inputs, which removes high frequency noise and boosts the signal. Further, these random feature neurons enable learning from fewer training samples and with smaller networks in artificial tasks. This structured random model of receptive fields provides a unifying, mathematically tractable framework to understand sensory encodings across both spatial and temporal domains. Biraj Pandey, Marius Pachitariu, Bingni W. Brunton, Kameron Decker Harris |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2018 | Community-based benchmarking improves spike rate inference from two-photon calcium imaging dataabstractIn recent years, two-photon calcium imaging has become a standard tool to probe the function of neural circuits and to study computations in neuronal populations. However, the acquired signal is only an indirect measurement of neural activity due to the comparatively slow dynamics of fluorescent calcium indicators. Different algorithms for estimating spike rates from noisy calcium measurements have been proposed in the past, but it is an open question how far performance can be improved. Here, we report the results of the spikefinder challenge, launched to catalyze the development of new spike rate inference algorithms through crowd-sourcing. We present ten of the submitted algorithms which show improved performance compared to previously evaluated methods. Interestingly, the top-performing algorithms are based on a wide range of principles from deep neural networks to generative models, yet provide highly correlated estimates of the neural activity. The competition shows that benchmark challenges can drive algorithmic developments in neuroscience. Philipp Berens, Jeremy Freeman, Thomas Deneux, Nicolay Chenkov, Thomas McColgan, Artur Speiser, Jakob H. Macke, Srinivas C. Turaga, Patrick J. Mineault, Peter Rupprecht, Stephan Gerhard, Rainer W. Friedrich, Johannes Friedrich, Liam Paninski, Marius Pachitariu, Kenneth D. Harris, Ben Bolte, Timothy A. Machado, Dario Ringach, Jasmine Stone, Luke E. Rogerson, Nicolas J. Sofroniew, Jacob Reimer, Emmanouil Froudarakis, Thomas Euler, Miroslav Román Rosón, Lucas Theis, Andreas S. Tolias, Matthias Bethge |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 15 |
| 2016 | Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSortabstractNew silicon technology is enabling large-scale electrophysiological recordings in vivo from hundreds to thousands of channels. Interpreting these recordings requires scalable and accurate automated methods for spike sorting, which should minimize the time required for manual curation of the results. Here we introduce KiloSort, a new integrated spike sorting framework that uses template matching both during spike detection and during spike clustering. KiloSort models the electrical voltage as a sum of template waveforms triggered on the spike times, which allows overlapping spikes to be identified and resolved. Unlike previous algorithms that compress the data with PCA, KiloSort operates on the raw data which allows it to construct a more accurate model of the waveforms. Processing times are faster than in previous algorithms thanks to batch-based optimization on GPUs. We compare KiloSort to an established algorithm and show favorable performance, at much reduced processing times. A novel post-clustering merging step based on the continuity of the templates further reduced substantially the number of manual operations required on this data, for the neurons with near-zero error rates, paving the way for fully automated spike sorting of multichannel electrode recordings. Marius Pachitariu, Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Shabnam N. Kadir, Matteo Carandini, Kenneth D. Harris |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2013 | Extracting regions of interest from biological images with convolutional sparse block codingabstractBiological tissue is often composed of cells with similar morphologies replicated throughout large volumes and many biological applications rely on the accurate identification of these cells and their locations from image data. Here we develop a generative model that captures the regularities present in images composed of repeating elements of a few different types. Formally, the model can be described as convolutional sparse block coding. For inference we use a variant of convolutional matching pursuit adapted to block-based representations. We extend the K-SVD learning algorithm to subspaces by retaining several principal vectors from the SVD decomposition instead of just one. Good models with little cross-talk between subspaces can be obtained by learning the blocks incrementally. We perform extensive experiments on simulated images and the inference algorithm consistently recovers a large proportion of the cells with a small number of false positives. We fit the convolutional model to noisy GCaMP6 two-photon images of spiking neurons and to Nissl-stained slices of cortical tissue and show that it recovers cell body locations without supervision. The flexibility of the block-based representation is reflected in the variability of the recovered cell shapes. Marius Pachitariu, Adam M. Packer, Noah Pettit, Henry Dalgleish, Michael Häusser, Maneesh Sahani |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2013 | Recurrent linear models of simultaneously-recorded neural populationsabstractPopulation neural recordings with long-range temporal structure are often best understood in terms of a shared underlying low-dimensional dynamical process. Advances in recording technology provide access to an ever larger fraction of the population, but the standard computational approaches available to identify the collective dynamics scale poorly with the size of the dataset. Here we describe a new, scalable approach to discovering the low-dimensional dynamics that underlie simultaneously recorded spike trains from a neural population. Our method is based on recurrent linear models (RLMs), and relates closely to timeseries models based on recurrent neural networks. We formulate RLMs for neural data by generalising the Kalman-filter-based likelihood calculation for latent linear dynamical systems (LDS) models to incorporate a generalised-linear observation process. We show that RLMs describe motor-cortical population data better than either directly-coupled generalised-linear models or latent linear dynamical system models with generalised-linear observations. We also introduce the cascaded linear model (CLM) to capture low-dimensional instantaneous correlations in neural populations. The CLM describes the cortical recordings better than either Ising or Gaussian models and, like the RLM, can be fit exactly and quickly. The CLM can also be seen as a generalization of a low-rank Gaussian model, in this case factor analysis. The computational tractability of the RLM and CLM allow both to scale to very high-dimensional neural data. Marius Pachitariu, Biljana Petreska, Maneesh Sahani |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2012 | Learning visual motion in recurrent neural networksabstractWe present a dynamic nonlinear generative model for visual motion based on a latent representation of binary-gated Gaussian variables. Trained on sequences of images, the model learns to represent different movement directions in different variables. We use an online approximate-inference scheme that can be mapped to the dynamics of networks of neurons. Probed with drifting grating stimuli and moving bars of light, neurons in the model show patterns of responses analogous to those of direction-selective simple cells in primary visual cortex. Most model neurons also show speed tuning and respond equally well to a range of motion directions and speeds aligned to the constraint line of their respective preferred speed. We show how these computations are enabled by a specific pattern of recurrent connections learned by the model. Marius Pachitariu, Maneesh Sahani |
NIPS | 1 |