Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jun Wang 0122
dblp:125/8189-122
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 36% Question answering and dialogue systems · 22% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data models and query languages · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | XSemPLR: Cross-Lingual Semantic Parsing in Multiple Natural Languages and Meaning Representations · ACL (1) 2023 Learning Contextual Representations for Semantic Parsing with Generation-Augmented Pre-Training · AAAI 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
text-to-SQL |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustness · ICLR 2023 Learning Contextual Representations for Semantic Parsing with Generation-Augmented Pre-Training · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 Learning Contextual Representations for Semantic Parsing with Generation-Augmented Pre-Training · AAAI 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
cross-lingual semantic parsing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | XSemPLR: Cross-Lingual Semantic Parsing in Multiple Natural Languages and Meaning Representations · ACL (1) 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › query answering
knowledge base querying |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DecAF: Joint Decoding of Answers and Logical Forms for Question Answering over Knowledge Bases · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DecAF: Joint Decoding of Answers and Logical Forms for Question Answering over Knowledge Bases · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustness · ICLR 2023 |
Data models and query languages › natural language interface
natural language interface to database |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustness · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
intermediate pre-training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-ended question answering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | XSemPLR: Cross-Lingual Semantic Parsing in Multiple Natural Languages and Meaning Representations · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
data-to-text generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding › text representation learning
contextual representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Contextual Representations for Semantic Parsing with Generation-Augmented Pre-Training · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diagnostic benchmark construction · 1.3zero-shot learning · 0.7multilingual training · 0.7few-shot learning · 0.7sequence-to-sequence language model · 0.6generation-based pre-training · 0.6self-supervised learning · 0.5masked language model · 0.5generation model · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | XSemPLR: Cross-Lingual Semantic Parsing in Multiple Natural Languages and Meaning RepresentationsabstractCross-Lingual Semantic Parsing (CLSP) aims to translate queries in multiple natural languages (NLs) into meaning representations (MRs) such as SQL, lambda calculus, and logic forms.However, existing CLSP models are separately proposed and evaluated on datasets of limited tasks and applications, impeding a comprehensive and unified evaluation of CLSP on a diverse range of NLs and MRs.To this end, we present XSEMPLR, a unified benchmark for cross-lingual semantic parsing featured with 22 natural languages and 8 meaning representations by examining and selecting 9 existing datasets to cover 5 tasks and 164 domains.We use XSEMPLR to conduct a comprehensive benchmark study on a wide range of multilingual language models including encoder-based models (mBERT, XLM-R), encoder-decoder models (mBART, mT5), and decoder-based models (Codex, BLOOM).We design 6 experiment settings covering various lingual combinations (monolingual, multilingual, cross-lingual) and numbers of learning samples (full dataset, few-shot, and zero-shot).Our experiments show that encoder-decoder models (mT5) achieve the highest performance compared with other popular models, and multilingual training can further improve the average performance.Notably, multilingual large language models (e.g., BLOOM) are still inadequate to perform CLSP tasks.We also find that the performance gap between monolingual training and cross-lingual transfer learning is still significant for multilingual models, though it can be mitigated by cross-lingual fewshot training.Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/psunlpgroup/ XSemPLR. Yusen Zhang 0001, Jun Wang 0122, Zhiguo Wang 0006, Rui Zhang 0037 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustness
Shuaichen Chang, Jun Wang 0122, Mingwen Dong, Lin Pan 0003, Henghui Zhu, Alexander Hanbo Li, Wuwei Lan, Sheng Zhang 0029, Jiarong Jiang, Joe Lilien, Steve Ash, William Yang Wang, Zhiguo Wang 0006, Vittorio Castelli, Patrick Ng, Bing Xiang |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | DecAF: Joint Decoding of Answers and Logical Forms for Question Answering over Knowledge Bases
Donghan Yu, Sheng Zhang 0029, Patrick Ng, Henghui Zhu, Alexander Hanbo Li, Jun Wang 0122, Yiqun Hu, William Yang Wang, Zhiguo Wang 0006, Bing Xiang |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question AnsweringabstractQuestion answering over semi-structured tables has attracted significant attention in the NLP community. However, most of the existing work focus on questions that can be answered with short-form answer, i.e. the answer is often a table cell or aggregation of multiple cells. This can mismatch with the intents of users who want to ask more complex questions that require free-form answers such as explanations. To bridge the gap, most recently, pre-trained sequence-to-sequence language models such as T5 are used for generating free-form answers based on the question and table inputs. However, these pre-trained language models have weaker encoding abilities over table cells and schema. To mitigate this issue, in this work, we present an intermediate pre-training framework, Generation-focused Table-based Intermediate Pre-training (GENTAP), that jointly learns representations of natural language questions and tables. GENTAP learns to generate via two training objectives to enhance the question understanding and table representation abilities for complex questions. Based on experimental results, models that leverage GENTAP framework outperform the existing baselines on FETAQA benchmark. The pre-trained models are not only useful for free-form question answering, but also for few-shot data-to-text generation task, thus showing good transfer ability by obtaining new state-of-the-art results. Peng Shi 0010, Patrick Ng, Feng Nan, Henghui Zhu, Jun Wang 0122, Jiarong Jiang, Alexander Hanbo Li, Rishav Chakravarti, Donald Weidner, Bing Xiang, Zhiguo Wang 0006 |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2021 | Learning Contextual Representations for Semantic Parsing with Generation-Augmented Pre-TrainingabstractMost recently, there has been significant interest in learning contextual representations for various NLP tasks, by leveraging large scale text corpora to train powerful language models with self-supervised learning objectives, such as Masked Language Model (MLM). Based on a pilot study, we observe three issues of existing general-purpose language models when they are applied in the text-to-SQL semantic parsers: fail to detect the column mentions in the utterances, to infer the column mentions from the cell values, and to compose target SQL queries when they are complex. To mitigate these issues, we present a model pretraining framework, Generation-Augmented Pre-training (GAP), that jointly learns representations of natural language utterance and table schemas, by leveraging generation models to generate high-quality pre-train data. GAP Model is trained on 2 million utterance-schema pairs and 30K utterance-schema-SQL triples, whose utterances are generated by generation models. Based on experimental results, neural semantic parsers that leverage GAP Model as a representation encoder obtain new state-of-the-art results on both Spider and Criteria-to-SQL benchmarks. Peng Shi 0010, Patrick Ng, Zhiguo Wang 0006, Henghui Zhu, Alexander Hanbo Li, Jun Wang 0122, Cícero Nogueira dos Santos, Bing Xiang |
AAAI | 6 |