Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stanislas Lauly

dblp:126/1700 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 39% Machine translation · 29% Information extraction and text analysis · 11%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation
0.612022
MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translation · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding › text representation learning
document representation learning
0.422017
Document Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
A Neural Autoregressive Topic Model · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
bilingual word embedding
0.212014
An Autoencoder Approach to Learning Bilingual Word Representations · NIPS 2014
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
cross-lingual word embedding
0.212014
An Autoencoder Approach to Learning Bilingual Word Representations · NIPS 2014
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
distributed representation learning
0.212014
An Autoencoder Approach to Learning Bilingual Word Representations · NIPS 2014
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.212022
MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translation · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
gender bias in machine translation
0.212022
MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translation · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
neural topic model
0.112012
A Neural Autoregressive Topic Model · NIPS 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.112012
A Neural Autoregressive Topic Model · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
autoregressive density estimation
0.112017
Document Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

counterfactual evaluation · 0.6contextual evaluation · 0.6neural autoregressive distribution estimation · 0.3n-gram model · 0.3feedforward neural network · 0.3autoencoder · 0.2hierarchical softmax · 0.1binary tree of words · 0.1autoregressive neural network · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translation
abstract
Anna Currey, Maria Nadejde, Raghavendra Reddy Pappagari, Mia Mayer, Stanislas Lauly, Xing Niu, Benjamin Hsu, Georgiana Dinu. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Anna Currey, Maria Nadejde, Raghavendra Reddy Pappagari, Mia Mayer, Stanislas Lauly, Xing Niu 0001, Benjamin Hsu, Georgiana Dinu
EMNLP5
2017 Document Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation
abstract
We present an approach based on feed-forward neural networks for learning the distribution over textual documents. This approach is inspired by the Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimator (NADE) model which has been shown to be a good estimator of the distribution over discrete-valued high-dimensional vectors. In this paper, we present how NADE can successfully be adapted to textual data, retaining the property that sampling or computing the probability of an observation can be done exactly and efficiently. The approach can also be used to learn deep representations of documents that are competitive to those learned by alternative topic modeling approaches. Finally, we describe how the approach can be combined with a regular neural network N-gram model and substantially improve its performance, by making its learned representation sensitive to the larger, document-level context.
Stanislas Lauly, Alexandre Allauzen, Hugo Larochelle
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2014 An Autoencoder Approach to Learning Bilingual Word Representations
Sarath Chandar, Stanislas Lauly, Hugo Larochelle, Mitesh M. Khapra, Balaraman Ravindran, Vikas C. Raykar, Amrita Saha
NIPS2
2012 A Neural Autoregressive Topic Model
abstract
We describe a new model for learning meaningful representations of text documents from an unlabeled collection of documents. This model is inspired by the recently proposed Replicated Softmax, an undirected graphical model of word counts that was shown to learn a better generative model and more meaningful document representations. Specifically, we take inspiration from the conditional mean-field recursive equations of the Replicated Softmax in order to define a neural network architecture that estimates the probability of observing a new word in a given document given the previously observed words. This paradigm also allows us to replace the expensive softmax distribution over words with a hierarchical distribution over paths in a binary tree of words. The end result is a model whose training complexity scales logarithmically with the vocabulary size instead of linearly as in the Replicated Softmax. Our experiments show that our model is competitive both as a generative model of documents and as a document representation learning algorithm.
Hugo Larochelle, Stanislas Lauly
NIPS2