Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stanislas Lauly
dblp:126/1700
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 39% Machine translation · 29% Information extraction and text analysis · 11% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translation · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding › text representation learning
document representation learning |
0.4 | 2 | 2017 | Document Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 A Neural Autoregressive Topic Model · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
bilingual word embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | An Autoencoder Approach to Learning Bilingual Word Representations · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
cross-lingual word embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | An Autoencoder Approach to Learning Bilingual Word Representations · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
distributed representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | An Autoencoder Approach to Learning Bilingual Word Representations · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translation · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
gender bias in machine translation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translation · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
neural topic model |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A Neural Autoregressive Topic Model · NIPS 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A Neural Autoregressive Topic Model · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
autoregressive density estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Document Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
counterfactual evaluation · 0.6contextual evaluation · 0.6neural autoregressive distribution estimation · 0.3n-gram model · 0.3feedforward neural network · 0.3autoencoder · 0.2hierarchical softmax · 0.1binary tree of words · 0.1autoregressive neural network · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine TranslationabstractAnna Currey, Maria Nadejde, Raghavendra Reddy Pappagari, Mia Mayer, Stanislas Lauly, Xing Niu, Benjamin Hsu, Georgiana Dinu. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022. Anna Currey, Maria Nadejde, Raghavendra Reddy Pappagari, Mia Mayer, Stanislas Lauly, Xing Niu 0001, Benjamin Hsu, Georgiana Dinu |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2017 | Document Neural Autoregressive Distribution EstimationabstractWe present an approach based on feed-forward neural networks for learning the distribution over textual documents. This approach is inspired by the Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimator (NADE) model which has been shown to be a good estimator of the distribution over discrete-valued high-dimensional vectors. In this paper, we present how NADE can successfully be adapted to textual data, retaining the property that sampling or computing the probability of an observation can be done exactly and efficiently. The approach can also be used to learn deep representations of documents that are competitive to those learned by alternative topic modeling approaches. Finally, we describe how the approach can be combined with a regular neural network N-gram model and substantially improve its performance, by making its learned representation sensitive to the larger, document-level context. Stanislas Lauly, Alexandre Allauzen, Hugo Larochelle |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2014 | An Autoencoder Approach to Learning Bilingual Word Representations
Sarath Chandar, Stanislas Lauly, Hugo Larochelle, Mitesh M. Khapra, Balaraman Ravindran, Vikas C. Raykar, Amrita Saha |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2012 | A Neural Autoregressive Topic ModelabstractWe describe a new model for learning meaningful representations of text documents from an unlabeled collection of documents. This model is inspired by the recently proposed Replicated Softmax, an undirected graphical model of word counts that was shown to learn a better generative model and more meaningful document representations. Specifically, we take inspiration from the conditional mean-field recursive equations of the Replicated Softmax in order to define a neural network architecture that estimates the probability of observing a new word in a given document given the previously observed words. This paradigm also allows us to replace the expensive softmax distribution over words with a hierarchical distribution over paths in a binary tree of words. The end result is a model whose training complexity scales logarithmically with the vocabulary size instead of linearly as in the Replicated Softmax. Our experiments show that our model is competitive both as a generative model of documents and as a document representation learning algorithm. Hugo Larochelle, Stanislas Lauly |
NIPS | 2 |