Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zi Teng
dblp:127/6311
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing › deformable models
deformable object modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Functional map-based reflection intrinsic symmetry detection and symmetrization for 2D deformable shapes · Comput. Aided Des. 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape matching
deformable shape matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Spectral Descriptors for 3D Deformable Shape Matching: A Comparative Survey · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis › symmetry detection
intrinsic symmetry detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Functional map-based reflection intrinsic symmetry detection and symmetrization for 2D deformable shapes · Comput. Aided Des. 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Functional map-based reflection intrinsic symmetry detection and symmetrization for 2D deformable shapes · Comput. Aided Des. 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Spectral Descriptors for 3D Deformable Shape Matching: A Comparative Survey · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape representation
spectral shape analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Spectral Descriptors for 3D Deformable Shape Matching: A Comparative Survey · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Spectral Descriptors for 3D Deformable Shape Matching: A Comparative Survey · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral descriptors · 1.7comparative evaluation · 1.7functional maps · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Functional map-based reflection intrinsic symmetry detection and symmetrization for 2D deformable shapes
Shengjun Liu 0002, Zi Teng, Haibo Wang 0009 |
Comput. Aided Des. | 2 |
| 2025 | Spectral Descriptors for 3D Deformable Shape Matching: A Comparative SurveyabstractA large number of 3D spectral descriptors have been proposed in the literature, which act as an essential component for 3D deformable shape matching and related applications. An outstanding descriptor should have desirable natures including high-level descriptive capacity, cheap storage, and robustness to a set of nuisances. It is, however, unclear which descriptors are more suitable for a particular application. This paper fills the gap by comprehensively evaluating nine state-of-the-art spectral descriptors on ten popular deformable shape datasets as well as perturbations such as mesh discretization, geometric noise, scale transformation, non-isometric setting, partiality, and topological noise. Our evaluated terms for a spectral descriptor cover four major concerns, i.e., distinctiveness, robustness, compactness, and computational efficiency. In the end, we present a summary of the overall performance and several interesting findings that can serve as guidance for the following researchers to construct a new spectral descriptor and choose an appropriate spectral feature in a particular application. Shengjun Liu 0002, Haibo Wang 0009, Dong-Ming Yan 0001, Qinsong Li, Feifan Luo, Zi Teng |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 6 |
| 2022 | Facial Landmarks and Generative Priors Guided Blind Face RestorationabstractBlind face restoration (BFR) from severely degraded face images is important in face image processing, and has attracted increasing attention due to its wide applications. How-ever, due to the complex unknown degradations in real-world scenarios, existing priors-based methods tend to restore faces with unstable quality. In this paper, we propose a Facial Landmarks and Generative Priors Guided Blind Face Restoration Network (FGPNet) to seamlessly integrate the advantages of generative priors and face-specific geometry priors. Specifically, we pretrain a high-quality (HQ) face synthesis generative adversarial network (GAN) and a landmarks prediction network, and then embed them into a U-shaped deep neural network (DNN) as decoder priors to guide face restoration, during which the generative priors can provide adequate details and the landmarks priors provide geometry and semantic information. Furthermore, we design facial priors fusion (FPF) blocks to incorporate the prior features from pretrained face synthesis GAN and landmarks prediction network in an adaptive and progressive manner, making our FGPNet exhibits good generalization in real-world application. Experiments demonstrate the superiority of our FGPNet in comparison to state-of-the-arts, and also show its potential in handling real-world low-quality images from several practical applications. Zi Teng, Chengdong Wu 0001, Sonya A. Coleman |
INDIN | 2 |