VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rajarshi Guhaniyogi
dblp:127/6766
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Learning theory · 26% Efficient and distributed learning · 5% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
2.6 | 4 | 2025 | Sketching in High-Dimensional Regression With Big Data Using Gaussian Scale Mixture Priors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Bayesian Data Sketching for Varying Coefficient Regression Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › probabilistic regression
bayesian regression |
2.6 | 4 | 2025 | Sketching in High-Dimensional Regression With Big Data Using Gaussian Scale Mixture Priors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Bayesian Data Sketching for Varying Coefficient Regression Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
varying coefficient model |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Bayesian Data Sketching for Varying Coefficient Regression Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional regression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sketching in High-Dimensional Regression With Big Data Using Gaussian Scale Mixture Priors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian asymptotics
posterior contraction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Data Sketching for Varying Coefficient Regression Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior modeling
scale mixture prior |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sketching in High-Dimensional Regression With Big Data Using Gaussian Scale Mixture Priors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed inference
distributed bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian asymptotics
posterior consistency |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bayesian Tensor Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › multivariate regression
tensor regression |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bayesian Tensor Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Compressed Gaussian Process for Manifold Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Compressed Gaussian Process for Manifold Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
manifold regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Compressed Gaussian Process for Manifold Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
nonparametric regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Compressed Gaussian Process for Manifold Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
random projection |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Compressed Gaussian Process for Manifold Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
MCMC · 2.6random linear transformation · 1.7sketching · 0.9data sketching · 0.9gaussian process · 0.8divide-and-conquer · 0.6data augmentation · 0.6shrinkage prior · 0.3random compression · 0.2model averaging · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bayesian Data Sketching for Varying Coefficient Regression ModelsabstractVarying coefficient models are popular for estimating nonlinear regression functions in functional data models. Their Bayesian variants have received limited attention in large data applications, primarily due to prohibitively slow posterior computations using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. We introduce Bayesian data sketching for varying coefficient models to obviate computational challenges presented by large sample sizes. To address the challenges of analyzing large data, we compress the functional response vector and predictor matrix by a random linear transformation to achieve dimension reduction and conduct inference on the compressed data. Our approach distinguishes itself from several existing methods for analyzing large functional data in that it requires neither the development of new models or algorithms nor any specialized computational hardware while delivering fully model-based Bayesian inference. Well-established methods and algorithms for varying-coefficient regression models can be applied to the compressed data. We establish posterior contraction rates for estimating the varying coefficients and predicting the outcome at new locations with the randomly compressed data model. We use simulation experiments and analyze remote sensed vegetation data to empirically illustrate the inferential and computational efficiency of our approach. Rajarshi Guhaniyogi, Laura Baracaldo, Sudipto Banerjee |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2025 | Sketching in High-Dimensional Regression With Big Data Using Gaussian Scale Mixture PriorsabstractBayesian computation of high-dimensional linear regression models with popular Gaussian scale mixture prior distributions using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) or its variants can be extremely slow or completely prohibitive due to the heavy computational cost that grows in the order of $p^3$, with $p$ as the number of features. Although a few recently developed algorithms allow computational efficiency in presence of a small to moderately large sample size, the computational issues are considerably less explored when sample size $n$ is also large, except for a few recent articles. In this article we propose a sketching approach to compress the $n$ original samples by a random linear transformation to $m< [abs][pdf][bib] © JMLR 2025. (edit, beta) Mastodon Rajarshi Guhaniyogi, Aaron W. Scheffler |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2022 | Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process PriorabstractVarying coefficient models (VCMs) are widely used for estimating nonlinear regression functions for functional data. Their Bayesian variants using Gaussian process priors on the functional coefficients, however, have received limited attention in massive data applications, mainly due to the prohibitively slow posterior computations using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. We address this problem using a divide-and-conquer Bayesian approach. We first create a large number of data subsamples with much smaller sizes. Then, we formulate the VCM as a linear mixed-effects model and develop a data augmentation algorithm for obtaining MCMC draws on all the subsets in parallel. Finally, we aggregate the MCMC-based estimates of subset posteriors into a single Aggregated Monte Carlo (AMC) posterior, which is used as a computationally efficient alternative to the true posterior distribution. Theoretically, we derive minimax optimal posterior convergence rates for the AMC posteriors of both the varying coefficients and the mean regression function. We provide quantification on the orders of subset sample sizes and the number of subsets. The empirical results show that the combination schemes that satisfy our theoretical assumptions, including the AMC posterior, have better estimation performance than their main competitors across diverse simulations and in a real data analysis. Rajarshi Guhaniyogi, Cheng Li 0063, Terrance D. Savitsky, Sanvesh Srivastava |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | High Dimensional Bayesian Regularization in Regressions Involving Symmetric Tensors
Rajarshi Guhaniyogi |
IPMU (3) | 1 |
| 2017 | Bayesian Tensor RegressionabstractWe propose a Bayesian approach to regression with a scalar response on vector and tensor covariates. Vectorization of the tensor prior to analysis fails to exploit the structure, often leading to poor estimation and predictive performance. We introduce a novel class of multiway shrinkage priors for tensor coefficients in the regression setting and present posterior consistency results under mild conditions. A computationally efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is developed for posterior computation. Simulation studies illustrate substantial gains over existing tensor regression methods in terms of estimation and parameter inference. Our approach is further illustrated in a neuroimaging application. Rajarshi Guhaniyogi, Shaan Qamar, David B. Dunson |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2016 | Compressed Gaussian Process for Manifold RegressionabstractNonparametric regression for large numbers of features ($p$) is an increasingly important problem. If the sample size $n$ is massive, a common strategy is to partition the feature space, and then separately apply simple models to each partition set. This is not ideal when $n$ is modest relative to $p$, and we propose an alternative approach relying on random compression of the feature vector combined with Gaussian process regression. The proposed approach is particularly motivated by the setting in which the response is conditionally independent of the features given the projection to a low dimensional manifold. Conditionally on the random compression matrix and a smoothness parameter, the posterior distribution for the regression surface and posterior predictive distributions are available analytically. Running the analysis in parallel for many random compression matrices and smoothness parameters, model averaging is used to combine the results. The algorithm can be implemented rapidly even in very large $p$ and moderately large $n$ nonparametric regression, has strong theoretical justification, and is found to yield state of the art predictive performance. Rajarshi Guhaniyogi, David B. Dunson |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |