Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruth R. Montgomery

dblp:127/9523 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-8661-4454ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis
0.622017
Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks · Bioinform. 2017
Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cytometry data analysis
mass cytometry data analysis
0.422017
Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning · Bioinform. 2017
Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cytometry data analysis
automated gating
0.312017
Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
batch effect correction
0.312017
Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cytometry data analysis
0.312017
Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell RNA sequencing
single-cell RNA-seq analysis
0.112017
Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks · Bioinform. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

residual neural network · 0.3maximum mean discrepancy · 0.3domain adaptation · 0.3deep learning · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning
abstract
MOTIVATION: Mass cytometry or CyTOF is an emerging technology for high-dimensional multiparameter single cell analysis that overcomes many limitations of fluorescence-based flow cytometry. New methods for analyzing CyTOF data attempt to improve automation, scalability, performance and interpretation of data generated in large studies. Assigning individual cells into discrete groups of cell types (gating) involves time-consuming sequential manual steps, untenable for larger studies. RESULTS: We introduce DeepCyTOF, a standardization approach for gating, based on deep learning techniques. DeepCyTOF requires labeled cells from only a single sample. It is based on domain adaptation principles and is a generalization of previous work that allows us to calibrate between a target distribution and a source distribution in an unsupervised manner. We show that DeepCyTOF is highly concordant (98%) with cell classification obtained by individual manual gating of each sample when applied to a collection of 16 biological replicates of primary immune blood cells, even when measured across several instruments. Further, DeepCyTOF achieves very high accuracy on the semi-automated gating challenge of the FlowCAP-I competition as well as two CyTOF datasets generated from primary immune blood cells: (i) 14 subjects with a history of infection with West Nile virus (WNV), (ii) 34 healthy subjects of different ages. We conclude that deep learning in general, and DeepCyTOF specifically, offers a powerful computational approach for semi-automated gating of CyTOF and flow cytometry data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our codes and data are publicly available at https://github.com/KlugerLab/deepcytof.git. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Huamin Li, Uri Shaham 0001, Kelly P. Stanton, Ruth R. Montgomery, Yuval Kluger
Bioinform.5
2017 Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks
abstract
MOTIVATION: Sources of variability in experimentally derived data include measurement error in addition to the physical phenomena of interest. This measurement error is a combination of systematic components, originating from the measuring instrument and random measurement errors. Several novel biological technologies, such as mass cytometry and single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), are plagued with systematic errors that may severely affect statistical analysis if the data are not properly calibrated. RESULTS: We propose a novel deep learning approach for removing systematic batch effects. Our method is based on a residual neural network, trained to minimize the Maximum Mean Discrepancy between the multivariate distributions of two replicates, measured in different batches. We apply our method to mass cytometry and scRNA-seq datasets, and demonstrate that it effectively attenuates batch effects. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: our codes and data are publicly available at https://github.com/ushaham/BatchEffectRemoval.git. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Uri Shaham 0001, Kelly P. Stanton, Huamin Li, Khadir Raddassi, Ruth R. Montgomery, Yuval Kluger
Bioinform.6
2013 Differential expression analysis for paired RNA-seq data
abstract
BACKGROUND: RNA-Seq technology measures the transcript abundance by generating sequence reads and counting their frequencies across different biological conditions. To identify differentially expressed genes between two conditions, it is important to consider the experimental design as well as the distributional property of the data. In many RNA-Seq studies, the expression data are obtained as multiple pairs, e.g., pre- vs. post-treatment samples from the same individual. We seek to incorporate paired structure into analysis. RESULTS: We present a Bayesian hierarchical mixture model for RNA-Seq data to separately account for the variability within and between individuals from a paired data structure. The method assumes a Poisson distribution for the data mixed with a gamma distribution to account variability between pairs. The effect of differential expression is modeled by two-component mixture model. The performance of this approach is examined by simulated and real data. CONCLUSIONS: In this setting, our proposed model provides higher sensitivity than existing methods to detect differential expression. Application to real RNA-Seq data demonstrates the usefulness of this method for detecting expression alteration for genes with low average expression levels or shorter transcript length.
Lisa M. Chung, John P. Ferguson, Vincent Bruno, Ruth R. Montgomery, Hongyu Zhao 0003
BMC Bioinform.6