Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard Lei Li
dblp:128/0949
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Requirements engineering and software design · 95% Program synthesis and code generation · 5% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.2 | 2 | 2013 | Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013 MaramaEML: An Integrated Multi-View Business Process Modelling Environment with Tree-Overlays, Zoomable Interfaces and Code Generation · ASE 2008 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering › domain-specific modeling
domain-specific visual languages |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
metamodeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013 |
Requirements engineering and software design
visual notation design |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cognitive evaluation · 0.2multi-view visual modeling · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual SpecificationsabstractDomain-specific visual languages support high-level modeling for a wide range of application domains. However, building tools to support such languages is very challenging. We describe a set of key conceptual requirements for such tools and our approach to addressing these requirements, a set of visual language-based metatools. These support definition of metamodels, visual notations, views, modeling behaviors, design critics, and model transformations and provide a platform to realize target visual modeling tools. Extensions support collaborative work, human-centric tool interaction, and multiplatform deployment. We illustrate application of the metatoolset on tools developed with our approach. We describe tool developer and cognitive evaluations of our platform and our exemplar tools, and summarize key future research directions. John C. Grundy, John G. Hosking, Karen Na-Liu Li, Norhayati Mohd. Ali, Jun Huh, Richard Lei Li |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 6 |
| 2008 | MaramaEML: An Integrated Multi-View Business Process Modelling Environment with Tree-Overlays, Zoomable Interfaces and Code GenerationabstractMaramaEML is an integrated support tool for the enterprise modelling language (EML) built using the Eclipse based Marama framework. It provides support for multiple visual notations including: the business process modelling notation (BPMN); the EML tree- based, multi-layer hierarchical service representation; fisheye zooming capabilities; automatic BPEL code generation; and inter-notation mapping. Richard Lei Li, John G. Hosking, John C. Grundy |
ASE | 1 |
| 2007 | Visual Modelling of Complex Business Processes with Trees, Overlays and Distortion-based DisplaysabstractCurrent approaches to modelling complex business processes fail to scale to large organizations. Key issues are cobweb and labyrinth problems exhibited by conventional box and line metaphors and large numbers of hidden dependencies introduced by compartment-based modularity. We have been developing a new approach, Enterprise Modelling Language, based on trees, overlays and fish-eye viewers to overcome these shortcomings of existing workflow notations. EML utilizes several visual metaphors to enhance the representation, navigation and management of large organizational hierarchies and process flows. We describe a prototype support tool, MaramaEML, that provides support for multiple visual notations including the business process modelling notation (BPMN), the EML tree-based, multi-layer hierarchical representation, fisheye zooming capabilities, automatic BPEL code generation, and inter-notation mapping. We describe our experiences using EML to model large business processes and initial evaluation results. Richard Lei Li, John G. Hosking, John C. Grundy |
VL/HCC | 1 |