Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Andrew Martchenko

dblp:128/2524 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-2618-9820ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video coding · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding › image compression
lossless image compression
0.212013
Bayesian Predictor Combination for Lossless Image Compression · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013
Image and video coding
predictive coding
0.212013
Bayesian Predictor Combination for Lossless Image Compression · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013
Image and video coding › predictive coding
adaptive prediction
0.012013
Bayesian Predictor Combination for Lossless Image Compression · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013
Image and video coding
image compression
0.012013
Bayesian Predictor Combination for Lossless Image Compression · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian parameter estimation · 0.2adaptive predictor combination · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Fast algorithm for least-squares based image prediction
abstract
A new computationally efficient algorithm for two‐dimensional sliding‐window least‐squares prediction is presented in this study. The fast algorithm is based on a recursive update of the Cholesky decomposition. Compared with the state‐of‐the‐art algorithm, the proposed algorithm reduces the computational complexity from O ( D 3 ) to O ( D 2 h ), where D is the predictor order and h is the height of the prediction patch. The computational improvement is made at the stage of solving the normal equations for which an update algorithm for the Cholesky decomposition of the covariance matrix is proposed. It is shown that a large part of the Cholesky decomposition at location n can be efficiently calculated by performing orthonormal updates on the Cholesky decomposition at n − 1. The computational improvement is made without requiring additional storage space. Extensive experiments using causal and non‐causal predictors of varying shapes and sizes have confirmed that the proposed algorithm is consistently faster than the state‐of‐the‐art algorithm and produces identical prediction images. The efficiency of the proposed algorithm is shown to be affected by the order in which pixels are sampled, thus an ordering procedure is proposed to minimise the number of numerical operations.
Andrew Martchenko, Guang Deng
IET Image Process.1
2013 A 3-degree of freedom binary search pose estimation technique
Andrew Martchenko, John C. Devlin
Mach. Vis. Appl.2
2013 Bayesian Predictor Combination for Lossless Image Compression
abstract
Adaptive predictor combination (APC) is a framework for combining multiple predictors for lossless image compression and is often at the core of state-of-the-art algorithms. In this paper, a Bayesian parameter estimation scheme is proposed for APC. Extensive experiments using natural, medical, and remote sensing images of 8–16 bit/pixel have confirmed that the predictive performance is consistently better than that of APC for any combination of fixed predictors and with only a marginal increase in computational complexity. The predictive performance improves with every additional fixed predictor, a property that is not found in other predictor combination schemes studied in this paper. Analysis and simulation show that the performance of the proposed algorithm is not sensitive to the choice of hyper-parameters of the prior distributions. Furthermore, the proposed prediction scheme provides a theoretical justification for the error correction stage that is often included as part of a prediction process.
Andrew Martchenko, Guang Deng
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1