Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Daniel M. Faissol

dblp:128/6848 · also Daniel Mello Faissol · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 51% Reinforcement learning · 31% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 11%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Medical and health informatics · 50%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation › inductive program synthesis
symbolic regression
1.422025
DisCo-DSO: Coupling Discrete and Continuous Optimization for Efficient Generative Design in Hybrid Spaces · AAAI 2025
Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding · NeurIPS 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein-protein interaction prediction
1.012026
Machine Learning Models Assisting the Development of Antibody Therapeutics and Vaccines - an Emerging Trend · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable reinforcement learning
decision tree policy
0.912025
DisCo-DSO: Coupling Discrete and Continuous Optimization for Efficient Generative Design in Hybrid Spaces · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable reinforcement learning
0.912025
DisCo-DSO: Coupling Discrete and Continuous Optimization for Efficient Generative Design in Hybrid Spaces · AAAI 2025
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization
0.912025
DisCo-DSO: Coupling Discrete and Continuous Optimization for Efficient Generative Design in Hybrid Spaces · AAAI 2025
Mathematical optimization › design optimization
generative design
0.912025
DisCo-DSO: Coupling Discrete and Continuous Optimization for Efficient Generative Design in Hybrid Spaces · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Discovering symbolic policies with deep reinforcement learning · ICML 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
neural-guided search
0.512021
Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning
0.412020
Single Episode Policy Transfer in Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › transfer learning in reinforcement learning
policy transfer
0.412020
Single Episode Policy Transfer in Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › supervised learning
property prediction
0.312026
Machine Learning Models Assisting the Development of Antibody Therapeutics and Vaccines - an Emerging Trend · AAAI 2026
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.112021
Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generative model · 2.6deep symbolic optimization · 2.6machine learning property prediction · 2.0deep reinforcement learning · 2.0genetic programming · 1.5risk-seeking policy gradient · 0.5autoregressive recurrent neural network · 0.5single episode transfer · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Machine Learning Models Assisting the Development of Antibody Therapeutics and Vaccines - an Emerging Trend
abstract
The development of novel effective medical treatments is one of the most important and expected beneficial effects of the AI revolution. This decade is witnessing the rise of AI models able to predict complex properties for protein-protein interactions that hold great promise in assisting in the development of antibody therapeutics and vaccines, including for diseases that long eluded us in the pursuit of an effective treatment. This paper introduces this area of research in a language accessible to an AI researcher, exploring the biological problems that can be solved by AI models, as well as the general context to make solutions feasible in practical scenarios. We survey the main current trends and works in this research area and point towards current still unsolved challenges and trade offs. We expect this paper will be extremely helpful for AI researchers trying to join the field, as well as for researchers already working in one of the subtopics that wish to have a better understanding of the general context around it.
Felipe Leno da Silva, Mikel Landajuela, Edwin A. Saada, Piyush Karande, Sudeep Sarma, Igor D'Angelo, Simone Conti, Daniel M. Faissol
AAAI8
2025 DisCo-DSO: Coupling Discrete and Continuous Optimization for Efficient Generative Design in Hybrid Spaces
abstract
We consider the challenge of black-box optimization within hybrid discrete-continuous and variable-length spaces, a problem that arises in various applications, such as decision tree learning and symbolic regression. We propose DisCo-DSO (Discrete-Continuous Deep Symbolic Optimization), a novel approach that uses a generative model to learn a joint distribution over discrete and continuous design variables to sample new hybrid designs. In contrast to standard decoupled approaches, in which the discrete and continuous variables are optimized separately, our joint optimization approach uses fewer objective function evaluations, is robust against non-differentiable objectives, and learns from prior samples to guide the search, leading to significant improvement in performance and sample efficiency. Our experiments on a diverse set of optimization tasks demonstrate that the advantages of DisCo-DSO become increasingly evident as problem complexity grows. In particular, we illustrate DisCo-DSO's superiority over the state-of-the-art methods for interpretable reinforcement learning with decision trees.
Jacob F. Pettit, Chak Shing Lee, Alex Ho, Daniel M. Faissol, Brenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela
AAAI5
2025 Language model-accelerated deep symbolic optimization
Felipe Leno da Silva, Andre R. Goncalves, Sam Nguyen, Denis Vashchenko, Ruben Glatt, Thomas Desautels, Mikel Landajuela, Daniel M. Faissol, Brenden K. Petersen
Neural Comput. Appl.8
2023 Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Mesh Refinement
abstract
Finite element simulations of physical systems governed by partial differential equations (PDE) crucially depend on adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) to allocate computational budget to regions where higher resolution is required. Existing scalable AMR methods make heuristic refinement decisions based on instantaneous error estimation and thus do not aim for long-term optimality over an entire simulation. We propose a novel formulation of AMR as a Markov decision process and apply deep reinforcement learning (RL) to train refinement policies directly from simulation. AMR poses a challenge for RL as both the state dimension and available action set changes at every step, which we solve by proposing new policy architectures with differing generality and inductive bias. The model sizes of these policy architectures are independent of the mesh size and hence can be deployed on larger simulations than those used at training time. We demonstrate in comprehensive experiments on static function estimation and time-dependent equations that RL policies can be trained on problems without using ground truth solutions, are competitive with a widely-used error estimator, and generalize to larger and unseen test problems.
Tarik Dzanic, Brenden K. Petersen, Jun Kudo, Ketan Mittal, Vladimir Z. Tomov, Sylvain Camier, Tuo Zhao, Hongyuan Zha, Tzanio V. Kolev, Robert W. Anderson, Daniel M. Faissol
AISTATS12
2021 Discovering symbolic policies with deep reinforcement learning
abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has proven successful for many difficult control problems by learning policies represented by neural networks. However, the complexity of neural network-based policies{—}involving thousands of composed non-linear operators{—}can render them problematic to understand, trust, and deploy. In contrast, simple policies comprising short symbolic expressions can facilitate human understanding, while also being transparent and exhibiting predictable behavior. To this end, we propose deep symbolic policy, a novel approach to directly search the space of symbolic policies. We use an autoregressive recurrent neural network to generate control policies represented by tractable mathematical expressions, employing a risk-seeking policy gradient to maximize performance of the generated policies. To scale to environments with multi-dimensional action spaces, we propose an "anchoring" algorithm that distills pre-trained neural network-based policies into fully symbolic policies, one action dimension at a time. We also introduce two novel methods to improve exploration in DRL-based combinatorial optimization, building on ideas of entropy regularization and distribution initialization. Despite their dramatically reduced complexity, we demonstrate that discovered symbolic policies outperform seven state-of-the-art DRL algorithms in terms of average rank and average normalized episodic reward across eight benchmark environments.
Mikel Landajuela, Brenden K. Petersen, Sookyung Kim, Cláudio P. Santiago, Ruben Glatt, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Jacob F. Pettit, Daniel M. Faissol
ICML8
2021 Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding
abstract
Symbolic regression is the process of identifying mathematical expressions that fit observed output from a black-box process. It is a discrete optimization problem generally believed to be NP-hard. Prior approaches to solving the problem include neural-guided search (e.g. using reinforcement learning) and genetic programming. In this work, we introduce a hybrid neural-guided/genetic programming approach to symbolic regression and other combinatorial optimization problems. We propose a neural-guided component used to seed the starting population of a random restart genetic programming component, gradually learning better starting populations. On a number of common benchmark tasks to recover underlying expressions from a dataset, our method recovers 65% more expressions than a recently published top-performing model using the same experimental setup. We demonstrate that running many genetic programming generations without interdependence on the neural-guided component performs better for symbolic regression than alternative formulations where the two are more strongly coupled. Finally, we introduce a new set of 22 symbolic regression benchmark problems with increased difficulty over existing benchmarks. Source code is provided at www.github.com/brendenpetersen/deep-symbolic-optimization.
T. Nathan Mundhenk, Mikel Landajuela, Ruben Glatt, Cláudio P. Santiago, Daniel M. Faissol, Brenden K. Petersen
NeurIPS5
2020 Single Episode Policy Transfer in Reinforcement Learning
Brenden K. Petersen, Hongyuan Zha, Daniel M. Faissol
ICLR4