Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samira Daruki

dblp:129/1707 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 93% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › data summarization
coresets
0.522018
Sublinear Algorithms for MAXCUT and Correlation Clustering · ICALP 2018
Range counting coresets for uncertain data · SoCG 2013
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms
0.312018
Sublinear Algorithms for MAXCUT and Correlation Clustering · ICALP 2018
Algorithms and data structures
sublinear algorithms
0.312018
Sublinear Algorithms for MAXCUT and Correlation Clustering · ICALP 2018
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
uncertain data
0.212013
Range counting coresets for uncertain data · SoCG 2013
Data mining
clustering
0.112018
Sublinear Algorithms for MAXCUT and Correlation Clustering · ICALP 2018
Data mining › clustering › graph clustering
correlation clustering
0.112018
Sublinear Algorithms for MAXCUT and Correlation Clustering · ICALP 2018
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph cut
max-cut
0.112018
Sublinear Algorithms for MAXCUT and Correlation Clustering · ICALP 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

concentration bounds · 0.7biased sampling · 0.7random sampling · 0.2discrepancy theory · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Sublinear Algorithms for MAXCUT and Correlation Clustering
abstract
We study sublinear algorithms for two fundamental graph problems, MAXCUT and correlation clustering. Our focus is on constructing core-sets as well as developing streaming algorithms for these problems. Constant space algorithms are known for dense graphs for these problems, while $Ω(n)$ lower bounds exist (in the streaming setting) for sparse graphs. Our goal in this paper is to bridge the gap between these extremes. Our first result is to construct core-sets of size $\tilde{O}(n^{1-δ})$ for both the problems, on graphs with average degree $n^δ$ (for any $δ>0$). This turns out to be optimal, under the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Our core-set analysis is based on studying random-induced sub-problems of optimization problems. To the best of our knowledge, all the known results in our parameter range rely crucially on near-regularity assumptions. We avoid these by using a biased sampling approach, which we analyze using recent results on concentration of quadratic functions. We then show that our construction yields a 2-pass streaming $(1+ε)$-approximation for both problems; the algorithm uses $\tilde{O}(n^{1-δ})$ space, for graphs of average degree $n^δ$.
Aditya Bhaskara, Samira Daruki, Suresh Venkatasubramanian
ICALP2
2016 Streaming Verification of Graph Properties
abstract
Streaming interactive proofs (SIPs) are a framework for outsourced computation. A computationally limited streaming client (the verifier) hands over a large data set to an untrusted server (the prover) in the cloud and the two parties run a protocol to confirm the correctness of result with high probability. SIPs are particularly interesting for problems that are hard to solve (or even approximate) well in a streaming setting. The most notable of these problems is finding maximum matchings, which has received intense interest in recent years but has strong lower bounds even for constant factor approximations. In this paper, we present efficient streaming interactive proofs that can verify maximum matchings exactly. Our results cover all flavors of matchings (bipartite/non-bipartite and weighted). In addition, we also present streaming verifiers for approximate metric TSP. In particular, these are the first efficient results for weighted matchings and for metric TSP in any streaming verification model.
Amir Abdullah, Samira Daruki, Chitradeep Dutta Roy, Suresh Venkatasubramanian
ISAAC2
2015 Streaming Verification in Data Analysis
Samira Daruki, Justin Thaler, Suresh Venkatasubramanian
ISAAC1
2013 Range counting coresets for uncertain data
abstract
We study coresets for various types of range counting queries on uncertain data. In our model each uncertain point has a probability density describing its location, sometimes defined as k distinct locations. Our goal is to construct a subset of the uncertain points, including their locational uncertainty, so that range counting queries can be answered by just examining this subset. We study three distinct types of queries. RE queries return the expected number of points in a query range. RC queries return the number of points in the range with probability at least a threshold. RQ queries returns the probability that fewer than some threshold fraction of the points are in the range. In both RC and RQ coresets the threshold is provided as part of the query. And for each type of query we provide coreset constructions with approximation-size tradeoffs. We show that random sampling can be used to construct each type of coreset, and we also provide significantly improved bounds using discrepancy-based approaches on axis-aligned range queries.
Amir Abdullah, Samira Daruki, Jeff M. Phillips
SoCG2