Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carl Ellis

dblp:129/2746 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Energy systems and smart grids
building energy management
0.212013
Matchstick: a room-to-room thermal model for predicting indoor temperature from wireless sensor data · IPSN 2013
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor network applications
0.212013
Matchstick: a room-to-room thermal model for predicting indoor temperature from wireless sensor data · IPSN 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thermal modeling · 0.3particle filter · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Matchstick: a room-to-room thermal model for predicting indoor temperature from wireless sensor data
abstract
In this paper we present a room-to-room thermal model used to accurately predict temperatures in residential buildings. We evaluate the accuracy of this model with ground truth data from four occupied family homes (two in the UK and two in the US). The homes have differing construction and a range of heating infrastructure (wall-mounted radiators, underfloor heating, and furnace-driven forced-air). Data was gathered using a network of simple and sparse (one per room) temperature sensors, a gas meter sensor, and an outdoor temperature sensor. We show that our model can predict future indoor temperature trends with a 90th percentile aggregate error between 0.61--1.50°, when given boiler or furnace actuation times and outdoor temperature forecasts. Two existing models were also implemented and then evaluated on our dataset alongside Matchstick. As a proof of concept, we used data from a previous control study to show that when Matchstick is used to predict temperatures (rather than assuming a preset linear heating rate) the possible gas savings increase by up to 3%.
Carl Ellis, Mike Hazas, James Scott
IPSN1
2010 A comparison of MDS-MAP and non-linear regression
abstract
For locating a set of stationary devices, algorithms such as MDS-MAP have been favoured by the sensor network community. This is generally because of their low computational complexity. Whilst comparisons for complexity and performance have been done for other algorithms, non-linear regression (NLR) has been neglected. The authors find that it is not much more expensive than MDS-MAP, yet can yield significantly better accuracy for sensor network localisation.
Carl Ellis, Mike Hazas
IPIN1