Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Rafael Ventura

dblp:129/9139 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › non-functional testing
robustness testing
0.312017
Robustness-Driven Resilience Evaluation of Self-Adaptive Software Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
probabilistic model checking
0.312017
Robustness-Driven Resilience Evaluation of Self-Adaptive Software Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › self-adaptive systems
architecture-based adaptation
0.112017
Robustness-Driven Resilience Evaluation of Self-Adaptive Software Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

robustness testing · 0.6probabilistic model checking · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Regularization of nouns due to drift, not selection: An artificial-language experiment
Rafael Ventura, Joshua B. Plotkin, Gareth Roberts
CogSci1
2019 Detection of Adulterated Pork Meat via Color and Chemical Characteristics
abstract
Pork in the Philippines is mostly sourced locally, and not all these meats come from well-sanitized slaughterhouses. Some carcasses of pigs that have died other than by slaughtering, called adulterated or double-dead meat, make their way to markets and get mixed up with legal and safe meat, only to be sold to unsuspecting consumers. These pose health hazards to meat handlers and consumers. One of the longtime practices in preventing the proliferation of double-dead meat in the markets is the manual inspection that analyzes the meat based on its organoleptic properties. This solution, however, is prone to limitations of subjectivity and human evaluation error. In this study, the proponents designed a system that will identify whether the meat sample is adulterated or not. The system is aimed at providing fast and accurate detection of double-dead meat using color and chemical determinants that is at least comparable to, or better than, humans. The application of the system can be utilized to replace the traditional human evaluation using electronic sensors as to avoid bias in the evaluation of the meat by different assessors as well as to eliminate the health risks on the meat inspectors and the consumers. The system utilizes three sensors: color sensor, methane sensor and pH level sensor. A microcontroller implements a logistic regression classifier. The model performs well, with an accuracy of 91.40% after validation, with an area of 0.95 under its ROC. When realized, the model has an accuracy of 93.18% compared to 84.09% of the human assessor's evaluation of the same meat samples.
Armil Monsura, Alexa Ray Fernando, Rafael Ventura, Denise Antoinette Bañas, Dorothy Joy de Castro, John Michael Molleno, Krystal Mae Denise Rama, Eirron Carl Ramirez, Benjamin Norbert Vitug
TENCON3
2017 Robustness-Driven Resilience Evaluation of Self-Adaptive Software Systems
abstract
An increasingly important requirement for certain classes of software-intensive systems is the ability to self-adapt their structure and behavior at run-time when reacting to changes that may occur to the system, its environment, or its goals. A major challenge related to self-adaptive software systems is the ability to provide assurances of their resilience when facing changes. Since in these systems, the components that act as controllers of a target system incorporate highly complex software, there is the need to analyze the impact that controller failures might have on the services delivered by the system. In this paper, we present a novel approach for evaluating the resilience of self-adaptive software systems by applying robustness testing techniques to the controller to uncover failures that can affect system resilience. The approach for evaluating resilience, which is based on probabilistic model checking, quantifies the probability of satisfaction of system properties when the target system is subject to controller failures. The feasibility of the proposed approach is evaluated in the context of an industrial middleware system used to monitor and manage highly populated networks of devices, which was implemented using the Rainbow framework for architecture-based self-adaptation.
Javier Cámara 0001, Rogério de Lemos, Nuno Laranjeiro, Rafael Ventura, Marco Vieira
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.4
2016 Incorporating architecture-based self-adaptation into an adaptive industrial software system
Javier Cámara 0001, Pedro Correia, Rogério de Lemos, David Garlan, Bradley R. Schmerl, Rafael Ventura
J. Syst. Softw.7