Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Florentina Bunea
dblp:13/1053
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1291-1210ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Learning theory · 59% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional regression |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Interpolating Predictors in High-Dimensional Factor Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 Prediction Under Latent Factor Regression: Adaptive PCR, Interpolating Predictors and Beyond · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.7 | 3 | 2022 | Interpolating Predictors in High-Dimensional Factor Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 Sparse Density Estimation with l1 Penalties · COLT 2007 Aggregation and Sparsity Via l1 Penalized Least Squares · COLT 2006 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Asymptotic confidence sets for random linear programs · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › over-parameterization › interpolation
minimum-norm interpolation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interpolating Predictors in High-Dimensional Factor Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent factor model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Prediction Under Latent Factor Regression: Adaptive PCR, Interpolating Predictors and Beyond · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Prediction Under Latent Factor Regression: Adaptive PCR, Interpolating Predictors and Beyond · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › linear model
principal component regression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Prediction Under Latent Factor Regression: Adaptive PCR, Interpolating Predictors and Beyond · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | High-Dimensional Inference for Cluster-Based Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
matrix factorization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal Estimation of Sparse Topic Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Data mining › text mining › topic modeling
sparse topic model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal Estimation of Sparse Topic Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Data mining › text mining
topic model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal Estimation of Sparse Topic Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
high-dimensional estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | The Group Square-Root Lasso: Theoretical Properties and Fast Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2014 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
sparse regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | The Group Square-Root Lasso: Theoretical Properties and Fast Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2014 |
Mathematical optimization › regularization › sparse regularization
l1 regularization |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Sparse Density Estimation with l1 Penalties · COLT 2007 Aggregation and Sparsity Via l1 Penalized Least Squares · COLT 2006 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
regularized regression |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Sparse Density Estimation with l1 Penalties · COLT 2007 Aggregation and Sparsity Via l1 Penalized Least Squares · COLT 2006 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
high-dimensional inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | High-Dimensional Inference for Cluster-Based Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › gaussian graphical model
precision matrix estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | High-Dimensional Inference for Cluster-Based Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Sequential Procedures for Aggregating Arbitrary Estimators of a Conditional Mean · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2008 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › excess risk bounds
oracle inequality |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Sequential Procedures for Aggregating Arbitrary Estimators of a Conditional Mean · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Sparse Density Estimation with l1 Penalties · COLT 2007 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
sparse estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Aggregation and Sparsity Via l1 Penalized Least Squares · COLT 2006 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › nonparametric classification
nearest neighbor classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Functional classification in Hilbert spaces · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
nonparametric classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Functional classification in Hilbert spaces · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
universal consistency |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Functional classification in Hilbert spaces · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Functional classification in Hilbert spaces · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse estimation · 0.9non-negative matrix factorization · 0.9random convex geometry · 0.7distributional limits · 0.7ridge regression · 0.6principal components regression · 0.6lasso · 0.6principal component analysis · 0.5oracle inequality · 0.5model-assisted clustering · 0.4empirical risk minimization · 0.4berry-esseen central limit theorem · 0.4square-root lasso · 0.2group lasso · 0.2convex optimization · 0.2least squares · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Asymptotic confidence sets for random linear programsabstractMotivated by the statistical analysis of the discrete optimal transport problem, we prove distributional limits for the solutions of linear programs with random constraints.Such limits were first obtained by Klatt, Munk, & Zemel (2022), but their expressions for the limits involve a computationally intractable decomposition of $\mathbb{R}^m$ into a possibly exponential number of convex cones.We give a new expression for the limit in terms of auxiliary linear programs, which can be solved in polynomial time.We also leverage tools from random convex geometry to give distributional limits for the entire set of random optimal solutions, when the optimum is not unique.Finally, we describe a simple, data-driven method to construct asymptotically valid confidence sets in polynomial time. Shuyu Liu, Florentina Bunea, Jonathan Weed |
COLT | 2 |
| 2022 | Interpolating Predictors in High-Dimensional Factor RegressionabstractThis work studies finite-sample properties of the risk of the minimum-norm interpolating predictor in high-dimensional regression models. If the effective rank of the covariance matrix $\Sigma$ of the $p$ regression features is much larger than the sample size $n$, we show that the min-norm interpolating predictor is not desirable, as its risk approaches the risk of trivially predicting the response by 0. However, our detailed finite-sample analysis reveals, surprisingly, that this behavior is not present when the regression response and the features are jointly low-dimensional, following a widely used factor regression model. Within this popular model class, and when the effective rank of $\Sigma$ is smaller than $n$, while still allowing for $p \gg n$, both the bias and the variance terms of the excess risk can be controlled, and the risk of the minimum-norm interpolating predictor approaches optimal benchmarks. Moreover, through a detailed analysis of the bias term, we exhibit model classes under which our upper bound on the excess risk approaches zero, while the corresponding upper bound in the recent work arXiv:1906.11300 diverges. Furthermore, we show that the minimum-norm interpolating predictor analyzed under the factor regression model, despite being model-agnostic and devoid of tuning parameters, can have similar risk to predictors based on principal components regression and ridge regression, and can improve over LASSO based predictors, in the high-dimensional regime. Florentina Bunea, Seth Strimas-Mackey, Marten H. Wegkamp |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2021 | Prediction Under Latent Factor Regression: Adaptive PCR, Interpolating Predictors and BeyondabstractThis work is devoted to the finite sample prediction risk analysis of a class of linear predictors of a response $Y\in \mathbb{R}$ from a high-dimensional random vector $X\in \mathbb{R}^p$ when $(X,Y)$ follows a latent factor regression model generated by a unobservable latent vector $Z$ of dimension less than $p$. Our primary contribution is in establishing finite sample risk bounds for prediction with the ubiquitous Principal Component Regression (PCR) method, under the factor regression model, with the number of principal components adaptively selected from the data---a form of theoretical guarantee that is surprisingly lacking from the PCR literature. To accomplish this, we prove a master theorem that establishes a risk bound for a large class of predictors, including the PCR predictor as a special case. This approach has the benefit of providing a unified framework for the analysis of a wide range of linear prediction methods, under the factor regression setting. In particular, we use our main theorem to recover known risk bounds for the minimum-norm interpolating predictor, which has received renewed attention in the past two years, and a prediction method tailored to a subclass of factor regression models with identifiable parameters. This model-tailored method can be interpreted as prediction via clusters with latent centers. To address the problem of selecting among a set of candidate predictors, we analyze a simple model selection procedure based on data-splitting, providing an oracle inequality under the factor model to prove that the performance of the selected predictor is close to the optimal candidate. We conclude with a detailed simulation study to support and complement our theoretical results. Xin Bing, Florentina Bunea, Seth Strimas-Mackey, Marten H. Wegkamp |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2020 | Optimal Estimation of Sparse Topic ModelsabstractTopic models have become popular tools for dimension reduction and exploratory analysis of text data which consists in observed frequencies of a vocabulary of $p$ words in $n$ documents, stored in a $p\times n$ matrix. The main premise is that the mean of this data matrix can be factorized into a product of two non-negative matrices: a $p\times K$ word-topic matrix $A$ and a $K\times n$ topic-document matrix $W$. This paper studies the estimation of $A$ that is possibly element-wise sparse, and the number of topics $K$ is unknown. In this under-explored context, we derive a new minimax lower bound for the estimation of such $A$ and propose a new computationally efficient algorithm for its recovery. We derive a finite sample upper bound for our estimator, and show that it matches the minimax lower bound in many scenarios. Our estimate adapts to the unknown sparsity of $A$ and our analysis is valid for any finite $n$, $p$, $K$ and document lengths. Empirical results on both synthetic data and semi-synthetic data show that our proposed estimator is a strong competitor of the existing state-of-the-art algorithms for both non-sparse $A$ and sparse $A$, and has superior performance is many scenarios of interest. Xin Bing, Florentina Bunea, Marten H. Wegkamp |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2020 | High-Dimensional Inference for Cluster-Based Graphical ModelsabstractMotivated by modern applications in which one constructs graphical models based on a very large number of features, this paper introduces a new class of cluster-based graphical models, in which variable clustering is applied as an initial step for reducing the dimension of the feature space. We employ model assisted clustering, in which the clusters contain features that are similar to the same unobserved latent variable. Two different cluster-based Gaussian graphical models are considered: the latent variable graph, corresponding to the graphical model associated with the unobserved latent variables, and the cluster-average graph, corresponding to the vector of features averaged over clusters. Our study reveals that likelihood based inference for the latent graph, not analyzed previously, is analytically intractable. Our main contribution is the development and analysis of alternative estimation and inference strategies, for the precision matrix of an unobservable latent vector Z. We replace the likelihood of the data by an appropriate class of empirical risk functions, that can be specialized to the latent graphical model and to the simpler, but under-analyzed, cluster-average graphical model. The estimators thus derived can be used for inference on the graph structure, for instance on edge strength or pattern recovery. Inference is based on the asymptotic limits of the entry-wise estimates of the precision matrices associated with the conditional independence graphs under consideration. While taking the uncertainty induced by the clustering step into account, we establish Berry-Esseen central limit theorems for the proposed estimators. It is noteworthy that, although the clusters are estimated adaptively from the data, the central limit theorems regarding the entries of the estimated graphs are proved under the same conditions one would use if the clusters were known in advance. As an illustration of the usage of these newly developed inferential tools, we show that they can be reliably used for recovery of the sparsity pattern of the graphs we study, under FDR control, which is verified via simulation studies and an fMRI data analysis. These experimental results confirm the theoretically established difference between the two graph structures. Furthermore, the data analysis suggests that the latent variable graph, corresponding to the unobserved cluster centers, can help provide more insight into the understanding of the brain connectivity networks relative to the simpler, average-based, graph. Carson Eisenach, Florentina Bunea, Yang Ning, Claudiu Dinicu |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2014 | The Group Square-Root Lasso: Theoretical Properties and Fast AlgorithmsabstractWe introduce and study the group square-root lasso (GSRL) method for estimation in high dimensional sparse regression models with group structure. The new estimator minimizes the square root of the residual sum of squares plus a penalty term proportional to the sum of the Euclidean norms of groups of the regression parameter vector. The net advantage of the method over the existing group lasso-type procedures consists in the form of the proportionality factor used in the penalty term, which for GSRL is independent of the variance of the error terms. This is of crucial importance in models with more parameters than the sample size, when estimating the variance of the noise becomes as difficult as the original problem. We show that the GSRL estimator adapts to the unknown sparsity of the regression vector, and has the same optimal estimation and prediction accuracy as the GL estimators, under the same minimal conditions on the model. This extends the results recently established for the square-root lasso, for sparse regression without group structure. Moreover, as a new type of result for square-root lasso methods, with or without groups, we study correct pattern recovery, and show that it can be achieved under conditions similar to those needed by the lasso or group-lasso-type methods, but with a simplified tuning strategy. We implement our method via a new algorithm, with proved convergence properties, which, unlike existing methods, scales well with the dimension of the problem. Our simulation studies support strongly our theoretical findings. Florentina Bunea, Johannes Lederer, Yiyuan She |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2008 | Sequential Procedures for Aggregating Arbitrary Estimators of a Conditional MeanabstractIn this correspondence, a sequential procedure for aggregating linear combinations of a finite family of regression estimates is described and analyzed. Particular attention is given to linear combinations having coefficients in the generalized simplex. The procedure is based on exponential weighting, and has a computationally tractable approximation. Analysis of the procedure is based in part on techniques from the sequential prediction of nonrandom sequences. Here these techniques are applied in a stochastic setting to obtain cumulative loss bounds for the aggregation procedure. From the cumulative loss bounds we derive an oracle inequality for the aggregate estimator for an unbounded response having a suitable moment-generating function. The inequality shows that the risk of the aggregate estimator is less than the risk of the best candidate linear combination in the generalized simplex, plus a complexity term that depends on the size of the coefficient set. The inequality readily yields convergence rates for aggregation over the unit simplex that are within logarithmic factors of known minimax bounds. Some preliminary results on model selection are also presented. Florentina Bunea, Andrew B. Nobel |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2007 | Sparse Density Estimation with l1 Penalties
Florentina Bunea, Alexandre B. Tsybakov, Marten H. Wegkamp |
COLT | 1 |
| 2006 | Aggregation and Sparsity Via l1 Penalized Least Squares
Florentina Bunea, Alexandre B. Tsybakov, Marten H. Wegkamp |
COLT | 1 |
| 2005 | Functional classification in Hilbert spacesabstractLet X be a random variable taking values in a separable Hilbert space X, with label Y/spl isin/{0,1}. We establish universal weak consistency of a nearest neighbor-type classifier based on n independent copies (X/sub i/,Y/sub i/) of the pair (X,Y), extending the classical result of Stone to infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Under a mild condition on the distribution of X, we also prove strong consistency. We reduce the infinite dimension of X by considering only the first d coefficients of a Fourier series expansion of each X/sub i/, and then we perform k-nearest neighbor classification in /spl Ropf//sup d/. Both the dimension and the number of neighbors are automatically selected from the data using a simple data-splitting device. An application of this technique to a signal discrimination problem involving speech recordings is presented. Gérard Biau, Florentina Bunea, Marten H. Wegkamp |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |