VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiarong Jiang
dblp:13/11107
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 21% Multi-agent systems · 16% Information extraction and text analysis · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 86% Data models and query languages · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Approximation and online algorithms · 50% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › retrieval models
generative retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Synthetic Data Strategies for Domain-Specific Generative Retrieval · ACL (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval › query formulation › query generation
synthetic query generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Synthetic Data Strategies for Domain-Specific Generative Retrieval · ACL (1) 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
knapsack problem |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automated Composition of Agents: A Knapsack Approach for Agentic Component Selection · NeurIPS 2025 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms › online packing and covering
online knapsack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automated Composition of Agents: A Knapsack Approach for Agentic Component Selection · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
retrieval-augmented generation evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustness · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
text-to-SQL |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustness · ICLR 2023 |
Data models and query languages › natural language interface
natural language interface to database |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustness · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
intermediate pre-training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-ended question answering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
data-to-text generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question Answering · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hybrid reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learned Prioritization for Trading Off Accuracy and Speed · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learned Prioritization for Trading Off Accuracy and Speed · NIPS 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learned Prioritization for Trading Off Accuracy and Speed · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Message-Passing for Approximate MAP Inference with Latent Variables · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Message-Passing for Approximate MAP Inference with Latent Variables · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Message-Passing for Approximate MAP Inference with Latent Variables · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Learned Prioritization for Trading Off Accuracy and Speed · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Message-Passing for Approximate MAP Inference with Latent Variables · NIPS 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
utility modeling · 1.7retrieval baseline · 1.7online knapsack · 1.7diagnostic benchmark construction · 1.3preference learning · 0.9large language model · 0.9hard negative mining · 0.9meta-evaluation · 0.8sequence-to-sequence language model · 0.6generation-based pre-training · 0.6reinforcement learning · 0.1imitation learning · 0.1apprenticeship learning · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | On Synthetic Data Strategies for Domain-Specific Generative RetrievalabstractThis paper investigates synthetic data generation strategies in developing generative retrieval models for domain-specific corpora, thereby addressing the scalability challenges inherent in manually annotating in-domain queries. We study the data strategies for a two-stage training framework: in the first stage, which focuses on learning to decode document identifiers from queries, we investigate LLM-generated queries across multiple granularity (e.g. chunks, sentences) and domain-relevant search constraints that can better capture nuanced relevancy signals. In the second stage, which aims to refine document ranking through preference learning, we explore the strategies for mining hard negatives based on the initial model’s predictions. Experiments on public datasets over diverse domains demonstrate the effectiveness of our synthetic data generation and hard negative sampling approach. Haoyang Wen, Jiarong Jiang |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2025 | PRACTIQ: A Practical Conversational Text-to-SQL dataset with Ambiguous and Unanswerable QueriesabstractMingwen Dong, Nischal Ashok Kumar, Yiqun Hu, Anuj Chauhan, Chung-Wei Hang, Shuaichen Chang, Lin Pan, Wuwei Lan, Henghui Zhu, Jiarong Jiang, Patrick Ng, Zhiguo Wang. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Mingwen Dong, Nischal Ashok Kumar, Yiqun Hu, Anuj Chauhan, Chung-Wei Hang, Shuaichen Chang, Lin Pan 0003, Wuwei Lan, Henghui Zhu, Jiarong Jiang, Patrick Ng, Zhiguo Wang 0006 |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 10 |
| 2025 | Automated Composition of Agents: A Knapsack Approach for Agentic Component SelectionabstractDesigning effective agentic systems requires the seamless composition and integration of agents, tools, and models within dynamic and uncertain environments. Most existing methods rely on static, semantic retrieval approaches for tool or agent discovery. However, effective reuse and composition of existing components remain challenging due to incomplete capability descriptions and the limitations of retrieval methods.
Component selection suffers because the decisions are not based on capability, cost, and real-time utility.
To address these challenges, we introduce a structured, automated framework for agentic system composition that is inspired by the knapsack problem. Our framework enables a composer agent to systematically identify, select, and assemble an optimal set of agentic components by jointly considering performance, budget constraints, and compatibility. By dynamically testing candidate components and modeling their utility in real-time, our approach streamlines the assembly of agentic systems and facilitates scalable reuse of resources. Empirical evaluation with Claude 3.5 Sonnet across five benchmarking datasets shows that our online-knapsack-based composer consistently lies on the Pareto frontier, achieving higher success rates at significantly lower component costs compared to our baselines.
In the single-agent setup, the online knapsack composer shows a success rate improvement of up to 31.6\% in comparison to the retrieval baselines.
In multi-agent systems, the online knapsack composer increases success rate from 37\% to 87\% when agents are selected from an agent inventory of 100+ agents.
The substantial performance gap confirms the robust adaptability of our method across diverse domains and budget constraints. Michelle Yuan, Khushbu Pahwa, Shuaichen Chang, Mustafa Kaba, Jiarong Jiang, Monica Sunkara |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2024 | RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented GenerationabstractDespite Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has shown promising capability in leveraging external knowledge, a comprehensive evaluation of RAG systems is still challenging due to the modular nature of RAG, evaluation of long-form responses and reliability of measurements. In this paper, we propose a fine-grained evaluation framework, RAGChecker, that incorporates a suite of diagnostic metrics for both the retrieval and generation modules. Meta evaluation verifies that RAGChecker has significantly better correlations with human judgments than other evaluation metrics. Using RAGChecker, we evaluate 8 RAG systems and conduct an in-depth analysis of their performance, revealing insightful patterns and trade-offs in the design choices of RAG architectures. The metrics of RAGChecker can guide researchers and practitioners in developing more effective RAG systems. Dongyu Ru, Xiangkun Hu, Tianhang Zhang, Peng Shi 0010, Shuaichen Chang, Cheng Jiayang, Cunxiang Wang, Shichao Sun, Huanyu Li 0010, Binjie Wang, Jiarong Jiang, Tong He 0002, Zhiguo Wang 0006, Pengfei Liu 0003, Yue Zhang 0004, Zheng Zhang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 13 |
| 2023 | Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustness
Shuaichen Chang, Jun Wang 0122, Mingwen Dong, Lin Pan 0003, Henghui Zhu, Alexander Hanbo Li, Wuwei Lan, Sheng Zhang 0029, Jiarong Jiang, Joe Lilien, Steve Ash, William Yang Wang, Zhiguo Wang 0006, Vittorio Castelli, Patrick Ng, Bing Xiang |
ICLR | 9 |
| 2022 | Generation-Focused Table-Based Intermediate Pre-training for Free-Form Question AnsweringabstractQuestion answering over semi-structured tables has attracted significant attention in the NLP community. However, most of the existing work focus on questions that can be answered with short-form answer, i.e. the answer is often a table cell or aggregation of multiple cells. This can mismatch with the intents of users who want to ask more complex questions that require free-form answers such as explanations. To bridge the gap, most recently, pre-trained sequence-to-sequence language models such as T5 are used for generating free-form answers based on the question and table inputs. However, these pre-trained language models have weaker encoding abilities over table cells and schema. To mitigate this issue, in this work, we present an intermediate pre-training framework, Generation-focused Table-based Intermediate Pre-training (GENTAP), that jointly learns representations of natural language questions and tables. GENTAP learns to generate via two training objectives to enhance the question understanding and table representation abilities for complex questions. Based on experimental results, models that leverage GENTAP framework outperform the existing baselines on FETAQA benchmark. The pre-trained models are not only useful for free-form question answering, but also for few-shot data-to-text generation task, thus showing good transfer ability by obtaining new state-of-the-art results. Peng Shi 0010, Patrick Ng, Feng Nan, Henghui Zhu, Jun Wang 0122, Jiarong Jiang, Alexander Hanbo Li, Rishav Chakravarti, Donald Weidner, Bing Xiang, Zhiguo Wang 0006 |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2012 | Learned Prioritization for Trading Off Accuracy and SpeedabstractUsers want natural language processing (NLP) systems to be both fast and accurate, but quality often comes at the cost of speed. The field has been manually exploring various speed-accuracy tradeoffs (for particular problems and datasets). We aim to explore this space automatically, focusing here on the case of agenda-based syntactic parsing \cite{kay-1986}. Unfortunately, off-the-shelf reinforcement learning techniques fail to learn good policies: the state space is simply too large to explore naively. An attempt to counteract this by applying imitation learning algorithms also fails: the ``teacher'' is far too good to successfully imitate with our inexpensive features. Moreover, it is not specifically tuned for the known reward function. We propose a hybrid reinforcement/apprenticeship learning algorithm that, even with only a few inexpensive features, can automatically learn weights that achieve competitive accuracies at significant improvements in speed over state-of-the-art baselines. Jiarong Jiang, Adam R. Teichert, Hal Daumé III, Jason Eisner |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2011 | Message-Passing for Approximate MAP Inference with Latent VariablesabstractWe consider a general inference setting for discrete probabilistic graphical models where we seek maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimates for a subset of the random variables (max nodes), marginalizing over the rest (sum nodes). We present a hybrid message-passing algorithm to accomplish this. The hybrid algorithm passes a mix of sum and max messages depending on the type of source node (sum or max). We derive our algorithm by showing that it falls out as the solution of a particular relaxation of a variational framework. We further show that the Expectation Maximization algorithm can be seen as an approximation to our algorithm. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets, against several baselines, demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed algorithm. Jiarong Jiang, Piyush Rai, Hal Daumé III |
NIPS | 1 |