VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Erick Rivas
dblp:13/1332
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
software design notation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | UML: The Language of Blueprints for Software? (Panel) · OOPSLA 1997 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
UML |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | UML: The Language of Blueprints for Software? (Panel) · OOPSLA 1997 |
Requirements engineering and software design
object-oriented analysis and design |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | UML: The Language of Blueprints for Software? (Panel) · OOPSLA 1997 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | UML: The Language of Blueprints for Software? (Panel)abstractThe Unified Method was launched by Grady Booch and Jim Rumbaugh at an OOPSLA'95 Conference Fringe meeting organised by Rational Software Corporation. In 1996 Unified Method was re-scoped to a notation, and renamed Unified Modeling Language (UML).Earlier this year, UML was submitted to Object Management Group for standardisation and has been endorsed by Microsoft, IBM, HP, Platinum Technologies, ObjectTime and many other corporations. No wonder UML is leading contender as de facto standard notation for object-oriented analysis and design.The panel will take a sanity check, and will go beyond hype and newsgroup flames and attempt to form an objective view of UML and its prospects.The members of panel have been working closely with UhL in many different roles, including that of UML language designer, end-user, consultant, CASE tool expert, and object-oriented methodologist. The discussion will focus on how LJML matches up in practice against one of its original. raisons d'etre as the language of blueprints for software.Specific issues to be addressed include:• What is advantage of UML over existing OOA/D notations?• Can UML be used on real projects today?• Is language sufficiently simple, and well-enough defined, to become de facto standard?• Will UML lead to improved OOA/D methods and CASE tools?• What is importance of meta-model in UML? Derek Coleman, John Artim, Victor Ohnjec, Erick Rivas, James E. Rumbaugh, Rebecca Wirfs-Brock |
OOPSLA | 4 |