Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Constantin Sârbu

dblp:13/3068 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › mutation testing
fault injection
0.112011
The impact of fault models on software robustness evaluations · ICSE 2011
Software testing
robustness analysis
0.112011
The impact of fault models on software robustness evaluations · ICSE 2011
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 The impact of fault models on software robustness evaluations
abstract
Following the design and in-lab testing of software, the evaluation of its resilience to actual operational perturbations in the field is a key validation need. Software-implemented fault injection (SWIFI) is a widely used approach for evaluating the robustness of software components. Recent research [24, 18] indicates that the selection of the applied fault model has considerable influence on the results of SWIFI-based evaluations, thereby raising the question how to select appropriate fault models (i.e. that provide justified robustness evidence). This paper proposes several metrics for comparatively evaluating fault models's abilities to reveal robustness vulnerabilities. It demonstrates their application in the context of OS device drivers by investigating the influence (and relative utility) of four commonly used fault models, i.e. bit flips (in function parameters and in binaries), data type dependent parameter corruptions, and parameter fuzzing. We assess the efficiency of these models at detecting robustness vulnerabilities during the SWIFI evaluation of a real embedded operating system kernel and discuss application guidelines for our metrics alongside.
Stefan Winter 0001, Constantin Sârbu, Neeraj Suri, Brendan Murphy
ICSE2
2010 Profiling the operational behavior of OS device drivers
Constantin Sârbu, Andréas Johansson, Neeraj Suri, Nachiappan Nagappan
Empir. Softw. Eng.1
2010 A software integration approach for designing and assessing dependable embedded systems
Neeraj Suri, Arshad Jhumka, Martin Hiller, András Pataricza, Shariful Islam, Constantin Sârbu
J. Syst. Softw.6
2008 Profiling the Operational Behavior of OS Device Drivers
abstract
As the complexity of modern Operating Systems (OS) increases, testing key OS components such as device drivers(DD) becomes increasingly complex given the multitude of possible DD interactions. If representative operational activity profiles of DDs within an OS could be obtained, these could significantly improve the understanding of the actual operational DD state space towards guiding the test efforts. Focusing on characterizing DD operational activities, this paper proposes a quantitative technique for profiling the runtime behavior of DDs using a set of occurrence and temporal metrics obtained via I/O traffic characterization. Such profiles are used to improve test adequacy against real-world workloads by enabling similarity quantification across them. The profiles also reveal execution hotspots in terms of DD functionalities activated in the field, thus allowing for dedicated test campaigns. A case study on actual Windows drivers substantiates our proposed approach.
Constantin Sârbu, Andréas Johansson, Neeraj Suri, Nachiappan Nagappan
ISSRE1