Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elzbieta Pekalska

dblp:13/4927 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
19ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 72% 3D vision · 12% Time series and sequential data · 8%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 92% Machine learning and data management · 8%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational geometry · 84% Mathematical optimization · 16%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning
0.322014
Spherical and Hyperbolic Embeddings of Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Spherical embeddings for non-Euclidean dissimilarities · CVPR 2010
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › geometric embedding
non-euclidean embedding
0.212014
Spherical and Hyperbolic Embeddings of Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.122009
Kernel Discriminant Analysis for Positive Definite and Indefinite Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape analysis
0.112010
Spherical embeddings for non-Euclidean dissimilarities · CVPR 2010
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › geometric embedding
spherical embedding
0.112010
Spherical embeddings for non-Euclidean dissimilarities · CVPR 2010
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
discriminant analysis
0.112009
Kernel Discriminant Analysis for Positive Definite and Indefinite Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › discriminant analysis
kernel discriminant analysis
0.112009
Kernel Discriminant Analysis for Positive Definite and Indefinite Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.022009
Kernel Discriminant Analysis for Positive Definite and Indefinite Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection
0.012002
One-Class LP Classifiers for Dissimilarity Representations · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
one-class classification
0.012002
One-Class LP Classifiers for Dissimilarity Representations · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › prototype learning
prototype-based representation
0.012002
One-Class LP Classifiers for Dissimilarity Representations · NIPS 2002
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › nearest neighbor classification
distance-based classification
0.012001
A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Machine learning and data management
kernel methods
0.012001
A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
indefinite kernels
0.012009
Kernel Discriminant Analysis for Positive Definite and Indefinite Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.012002
One-Class LP Classifiers for Dissimilarity Representations · NIPS 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tangent space optimization · 0.4exponential map · 0.4regularized kernel mahalanobis distance · 0.2kernel trick · 0.2hyperbolic embedding · 0.1elliptic embedding · 0.1linear programming · 0.1dissimilarity transformation · 0.1dissimilarity representation · 0.1kernels · 0.0kernel · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Spherical and Hyperbolic Embeddings of Data
abstract
Many computer vision and pattern recognition problems may be posed as the analysis of a set of dissimilarities between objects. For many types of data, these dissimilarities are not euclidean (i.e., they do not represent the distances between points in a euclidean space), and therefore cannot be isometrically embedded in a euclidean space. Examples include shape-dissimilarities, graph distances and mesh geodesic distances. In this paper, we provide a means of embedding such non-euclidean data onto surfaces of constant curvature. We aim to embed the data on a space whose radius of curvature is determined by the dissimilarity data. The space can be either of positive curvature (spherical) or of negative curvature (hyperbolic). We give an efficient method for solving the spherical and hyperbolic embedding problems on symmetric dissimilarity data. Our approach gives the radius of curvature and a method for approximating the objects as points on a hyperspherical manifold without optimisation. For objects which do not reside exactly on the manifold, we develop a optimisation-based procedure for approximate embedding on a hyperspherical manifold. We use the exponential map between the manifold and its local tangent space to solve the optimisation problem locally in the euclidean tangent space. This process is efficient enough to allow us to embed data sets of several thousand objects. We apply our method to a variety of data including time warping functions, shape similarities, graph similarity and gesture similarity data. In each case the embedding maintains the local structure of the data while placing the points in a metric space.
Richard C. Wilson 0001, Edwin R. Hancock, Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2012 The dissimilarity space: Bridging structural and statistical pattern recognition
Robert P. W. Duin, Elzbieta Pekalska
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2
2011 The Dissimilarity Representation for Structural Pattern Recognition
Robert P. W. Duin, Elzbieta Pekalska
CIARP2
2010 Spherical embeddings for non-Euclidean dissimilarities
abstract
Many computer vision and pattern recognition problems may be posed by defining a way of measuring dissimilarities between patterns. For many types of data, these dissimilarities are not Euclidean, and may not be metric. In this paper, we provide a means of embedding such data. We aim to embed the data on a hypersphere whose radius of curvature is determined by the dissimilarity data. The hypersphere can be either of positive curvature (elliptic) or of negative curvature (hyperbolic). We give an efficient method for solving the elliptic and hyperbolic embedding problems on symmetric dissimilarity data. This method gives the radius of curvature and a method for approximating the objects as points on a hyperspherical manifold. We apply our method to a variety of data including shape-similarities, graph-similarity and gesture-similarity data. In each case the embedding maintains the local structure of the data while placing the points in a metric space.
Richard C. Wilson 0001, Edwin R. Hancock, Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin
CVPR3
2009 Minimum spanning tree based one-class classifier
Piotr Juszczak, David M. J. Tax, Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin
Neurocomputing3
2009 Kernel Discriminant Analysis for Positive Definite and Indefinite Kernels
abstract
Kernel methods are a class of well established and successful algorithms for pattern analysis thanks to their mathematical elegance and good performance. Numerous nonlinear extensions of pattern recognition techniques have been proposed so far based on the so-called kernel trick. The objective of this paper is twofold. First, we derive an additional kernel tool that is still missing, namely kernel quadratic discriminant (KQD). We discuss different formulations of KQD based on the regularized kernel Mahalanobis distance in both complete and class-related subspaces. Secondly, we propose suitable extensions of kernel linear and quadratic discriminants to indefinite kernels. We provide classifiers that are applicable to kernels defined by any symmetric similarity measure. This is important in practice because problem-suited proximity measures often violate the requirement of positive definiteness. As in the traditional case, KQD can be advantageous for data with unequal class spreads in the kernel-induced spaces, which cannot be well separated by a linear discriminant. We illustrate this on artificial and real data for both positive definite and indefinite kernels.
Elzbieta Pekalska, Bernard Haasdonk
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2009 Component-based discriminative classification for hidden Markov models
Manuele Bicego, Elzbieta Pekalska, David M. J. Tax, Robert P. W. Duin
Pattern Recognit.2
2008 On refining dissimilarity matrices for an improved NN learning
abstract
Application-specific dissimilarity functions can be used for learning from a set of objects represented by pairwise dissimilarity matrices in this context. These dissimilarities may, however, suffer from various defects, e.g. when derived from a suboptimal optimization or by the use of non-metric or noisy measures. In this paper, we study procedures for refining such dissimilarities. These methods work in a representation space, either a dissimilarity space or a pseudo-Euclidean embedded space. On a series of experiments we show that refining may significantly improve the nearest neighbor classifications of dissimilarity measurements.
Robert P. W. Duin, Elzbieta Pekalska
ICPR2
2008 Indefinite Kernel Fisher Discriminant
abstract
Indefinite kernels arise in practice, e.g. from problem-specific kernel construction. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the behavior and suitability of classifiers in the corresponding indefinite inner product spaces. In this paper we address the Indefinite Kernel Fisher Discriminant (IKFD). First, we give the geometric interpretation of the Fisher Discriminant in indefinite inner product spaces. We show that IKFD is closely related to the well-known formulation of the traditional Kernel Fisher Discriminant derived for positive definite kernels. Practical implications are that IKFD can be directly applied to indefinite kernels without manipulation of the kernel matrix. Experiments demonstrate the geometrically intuitive classification and enable comparisons to other indefinite kernel classifiers.
Bernard Haasdonk, Elzbieta Pekalska
ICPR2
2008 Beyond Traditional Kernels: Classification in Two Dissimilarity-Based Representation Spaces
abstract
Proximity captures the degree of similarity between examples and is thereby fundamental in learning. Learning from pairwise proximity data usually relies on either kernel methods for specifically designed kernels or the nearest neighbor (NN) rule. Kernel methods are powerful, but often cannot handle arbitrary proximities without necessary corrections. The NN rule can work well in such cases, but suffers from local decisions. The aim of this paper is to provide an indispensable explanation and insights about two simple yet powerful alternatives when neither conventional kernel methods nor the NN rule can perform best. These strategies use two proximity-based representation spaces (RSs) in which accurate classifiers are trained on all training objects and demand comparisons to a small set of prototypes. They can handle all meaningful dissimilarity measures, including non-Euclidean and nonmetric ones. Practical examples illustrate that these RSs can be highly advantageous in supervised learning. Simple classifiers built there tend to outperform the NN rule. Moreover, computational complexity may be controlled. Consequently, these approaches offer an appealing alternative to learn from proximity data for which kernel methods cannot directly be applied, are too costly or impractical, while the NN rule leads to noisy results.
Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C1
2007 Pairwise feature evaluation for constructing reduced representations
Artsiom Harol, Carmen Lai, Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin
Pattern Anal. Appl.3
2006 Experimental study on prototype optimisation algorithms for prototype-based classification in vector spaces
Mayte Lozano, José Martínez Sotoca, J. Salvador Sánchez 0001, Filiberto Pla, Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin
Pattern Recognit.5
2006 Prototype selection for dissimilarity-based classifiers
Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin, Pavel Paclík
Pattern Recognit.1
2004 A Study On Combining Image Representations For Image Classification And Retrieval
abstract
A flexible description of images is offered by a cloud of points in a feature space. In the context of image retrieval such clouds can be represented in a number of ways. Two approaches are here considered. The first approach is based on the assumption of a normal distribution, hence homogeneous clouds, while the second one focuses on the boundary description, which is more suitable for multimodal clouds. The images are then compared either by using the Mahalanobis distance or by the support vector data description (SVDD), respectively. The paper investigates some possibilities of combining the image clouds based on the idea that responses of several cloud descriptions may convey a pattern, specific for semantically similar images. A ranking of image dissimilarities is used as a comparison for two image databases targeting image classification and retrieval problems. We show that combining of the SVDD descriptions improves the retrieval performance with respect to ranking, on the contrary to the Mahalanobis case. Surprisingly, it turns out that the ranking of the Mahalanobis distances works well also for inhomogeneous images.
Carmen Lai, David M. J. Tax, Robert P. W. Duin, Elzbieta Pekalska, Pavel Paclík
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell.4
2002 One-Class LP Classifiers for Dissimilarity Representations
abstract
Problems in which abnormal or novel situations should be detected can be approached by describing the domain of the class of typical exam- ples. These applications come from the areas of machine diagnostics, fault detection, illness identification or, in principle, refer to any prob- lem where little knowledge is available outside the typical class. In this paper we explain why proximities are natural representations for domain descriptors and we propose a simple one-class classifier for dissimilarity representations. By the use of linear programming an efficient one-class description can be found, based on a small number of prototype objects. This classifier can be made (1) more robust by transforming the dissimi- larities and (2) cheaper to compute by using a reduced representation set. Finally, a comparison to a comparable one-class classifier by Campbell and Bennett is given.
Elzbieta Pekalska, David M. J. Tax, Robert P. W. Duin
NIPS1
2002 Dissimilarity representations allow for building good classifiers
Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin
Pattern Recognit. Lett.1
2001 A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification
Elzbieta Pekalska, Pavel Paclík, Robert P. W. Duin
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2000 Classifiers for Dissimilarity-Based Pattern Recognition
abstract
In the traditional way of learning from examples of objects the classifiers are built in a feature space. However, alternative ways can be found by constructing decision rules on dissimilarity (distance) representations, instead. In such a recognition process a new object is described by its distances to (a subset of) the training samples. In this paper, a number of methods to tackle this type of classification problem are investigated: the feature-based (interpreting the distance representation as a feature space) and rank-based (considering the given relations) decision rules. The experiments demonstrate that the feature-based (especially normal-based) classifiers often outperform the rank-based ones. This is to be expected, since summation-based distances are, under general conditions, approximately normally distributed. In addition, the support vector classifier also achieves a high accuracy.
Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin
ICPR1
1999 Relational discriminant analysis
Robert P. W. Duin, Elzbieta Pekalska, Dick de Ridder
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2