Samuel T. Redwine Jr.

dblp:13/5773 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 64% Software maintenance and evolution · 36%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
test coverage
0.011983
An Engineering Approach to Software Test Data Design · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983
Software testing › test input generation
test data selection
0.011983
An Engineering Approach to Software Test Data Design · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

domain coverage · 0.0checklists · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Workshop on Secure Software Engineering Education & Training (WSSEET 2006)
abstract
The focus of this one-day workshop on April 18th, 2006 was the experience, current situation, and the future of education and training in software engineering of (more) secure software. The workshop was intended for those in education, government, and industry at all levels doing education or training in secure software engineering and for those who would like to – as well as others interested in the subject or the secure software engineering workforce.
Samuel T. Redwine Jr.
CSEE&T1
2005 Software Assurance Education
abstract
Software engineering processes for building safe and secure software have existed for a long time. However, these processes-particularly for secure software engineering-have not been widely taught within colleges and universities leading to a shortage of graduates skilled in these areas. This panel will discuss the increasing need for colleges and universities to produce graduates that are skilled in building safe and secure software. Panelists will share their experiences teaching courses in these areas and future directions for curricula.
Samuel T. Redwine Jr., Hun Kim, Joseph Saur, Shawn A. Butler
CSEE&T1
1985 Software Technology Maturation
Samuel T. Redwine Jr., William E. Riddle
ICSE1
1983 An Engineering Approach to Software Test Data Design
abstract
A systematic approach to test data design is presented based on both practical translation of theory and organization of professional lore. The approach is organized around five domains and achieving coverage (exercise) of them by the test data. The domains are processing functions, input, output, interaction among functions, and the code itself. Checklists are used to generate data for processing functions. Separate checklists have been constructed for eight common business data processing functions such as editing, updating, sorting, and reporting. Checklists or specific concrete directions also exist for input, output, interaction, and code coverage. Two global heuristics concerning all test data are also used. A limited discussion on documenting test input data, expected results, and actual results is included.
Samuel T. Redwine Jr.
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1