MOTIVATION: One major area of interest in analyzing oligonucleotide gene array data is identifying differentially expressed genes. A challenge to biostatisticians is to develop an approach to summarizing probe-level information that adequately reflects the true expression level while accounting for probe variation, chip variation and interaction effects. Various statistical tools, such as MAS and RMA, have been developed to address this issue. In these approaches, the probe level expression data are summarized into gene level data, which are then used for downstream statistical analysis. Since probe variation is often larger than chip variation and there is also a potential interaction effect between probe affinity and treatment effect, strategies such as a gene level analysis, may not be optimal. In this study, we propose a procedure to analyze probe level data for selecting differentially expressed genes under two treatment conditions (groups) with a small number of replicates. The probe level discrepancy between two groups can be measured by a difference of the percentiles of probe perfect-match (PM) ranks or of probe PM weighted ranks. The difference is then compared with a pre-specified threshold to determine differentially expressed genes. The probe level approach takes into account non-homogenous treatment effects and reduces possible cross-hybridization effects across a set of probes. RESULTS: The proposed approach is compared with MAS and RMA using two benchmark gene array datasets. Positive predictivity and sensitivity are used for evaluation. Results show the proposed approach has higher positive predictivity and higher sensitivity. AVAILABILITY: Available on request from the authors. CONTACT: [email protected].

MOTIVATION: Analysis of oligonucleotide array data, especially to select genes of interest, is a highly challenging task because of the large volume of information and various experimental factors. Moreover, interaction effect (i.e. expression changes depend on probe effects) complicates the analysis because current methods often use an additive model to analyze data. We propose an approach to address these issues with the aim of producing a more reliable selection of differentially expressed genes. The approach uses the rank for normalization, employs the percentile-range to measure expression variation, and applies various filters to monitor expression changes. RESULTS: We compare our approach with MAS and Dchip models. A data set from an angiogenesis study is used for illustration. Results show that our approach performs better than other methods either in identification of the positive control gene or in PCR confirmatory tests. In addition, the invariant set of genes in our approach provides an efficient way for normalization.