Wenjuan Fan

dblp:13/7077 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A bi-level programming problem of medicine procurement and production optimization
Wenjuan Fan, Kaining Shao, Shaowen Lan, Shuwan Zhu
J. Glob. Optim.1
2024 Enhancing computer-aided translation system with BiLSTM and convolutional neural network using a knowledge graph approach
Yueting Xiang, Yangfen Chen, Wenjuan Fan
J. Supercomput.3
2020 Patient scheduling with deteriorating treatment duration and maintenance activity
Kaining Shao, Wenjuan Fan, Zishu Yang, Shanlin Yang, Panos M. Pardalos
Soft Comput.2
2018 Serial-batching group scheduling with release times and the combined effects of deterioration and truncated job-dependent learning
Wenjuan Fan, Xinbao Liu, Panos M. Pardalos, Min Kong
J. Glob. Optim.1
2015 Filtering Unfair Users - A Hidden Markov Model Approach
Bushra Anjum, Manish Rajangam, Harry G. Perros, Wenjuan Fan
ICISSP4
2014 A novel two-stage model for cloud service trustworthiness evaluation
abstract
Abstract In this paper, we address the cloud service trustworthiness evaluation problem, which in essence is a multi‐attribute decision‐making problem, by proposing a novel evaluation model based on the fuzzy gap measurement and the evidential reasoning approach. There are many sources of uncertainties in the process of cloud service trustworthiness evaluation. In addition to the intrinsic uncertainties, cloud service providers face the problem of discrepant evaluation information given by different users from different perspectives. To address these problems, we develop a novel fuzzy gap evaluation approach to assess cloud service trustworthiness and to provide evaluation values from different perspectives. From the evaluation values, the perception–importance, delivery–importance, and perception–delivery gaps are generated. These three gaps reflect the discrepancy evaluation of cloud service trustworthiness in terms of perception utility, delivery utility, and importance utility, respectively. Finally, the gap measurement of each perspective is represented by a belief structure and aggregated using the evidential reasoning approach to generate final evaluation results for informative and robust decision making. From this hybrid two‐stage evaluation process, cloud service providers can get improvement suggestions from intermediate information derived from the gap measurement, which is the main advantage of this evaluation process.
Wenjuan Fan, Shanlin Yang
Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng.1
2014 A novel trust management framework for multi-cloud environments based on trust service providers
Wenjuan Fan, Harry G. Perros
Knowl. Based Syst.1