VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul M. Zimmerman
dblp:130/0201
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7444-1314ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 63% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 32% Learning theory · 5% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 77% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 23% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › electronic structure calculation
density functional theory |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Large-Scale Materials Modeling at Quantum Accuracy: Ab Initio Simulations of Quasicrystals and Interacting Extended Defects in Metallic Alloys · SC 2023 |
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Large-Scale Materials Modeling at Quantum Accuracy: Ab Initio Simulations of Quasicrystals and Interacting Extended Defects in Metallic Alloys · SC 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
adaptive sampling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adaptive Sampling for Discovery · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adaptive Sampling for Discovery · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › information-theoretic exploration
information-directed sampling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adaptive Sampling for Discovery · NeurIPS 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures › analysis of algorithms
random trees |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Active Learning for Non-Parametric Regression Using Purely Random Trees · NeurIPS 2018 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
tree algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Active Learning for Non-Parametric Regression Using Purely Random Trees · NeurIPS 2018 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU-accelerated scientific computing
GPU-accelerated simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Large-Scale Materials Modeling at Quantum Accuracy: Ab Initio Simulations of Quasicrystals and Interacting Extended Defects in Metallic Alloys · SC 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | TorsionNet: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Sequential Conformer Search · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax optimality |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Active Learning for Non-Parametric Regression Using Purely Random Trees · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixed-precision algorithms · 1.3machine-learned density functional · 1.3asynchronous compute-communication · 1.3monte carlo · 0.9molecular dynamics · 0.9curriculum learning · 0.9mondrian trees · 0.7finite-element discretization · 0.7finite element discretization · 0.7active sampling · 0.7low-rank model · 0.6linear bandit · 0.6information-directed sampling · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Large-Scale Materials Modeling at Quantum Accuracy: Ab Initio Simulations of Quasicrystals and Interacting Extended Defects in Metallic AlloysabstractAb initio electronic-structure has remained dichotomous between achievable accuracy and length-scale. Quantum many-body (QMB) methods realize quantum accuracy but fail to scale. Density functional theory (DFT) scales favorably but remains far from quantum accuracy. We present a framework that breaks this dichotomy by use of three interconnected modules: (i) invDFT: a methodological advance in inverse DFT linking QMB methods to DFT; (ii) MLXC: a machine-learned density functional trained with invDFT data, commensurate with quantum accuracy; (iii) DFT-FE-MLXC: an adaptive higher-order spectral finite-element (FE) based DFT implementation that integrates MLXC with efficient solver strategies and HPC innovations in FE-specific dense linear algebra, mixed-precision algorithms, and asynchronous compute-communication. We demonstrate a paradigm shift in DFT that not only provides an accuracy commensurate with QMB methods in ground-state energies, but also attains an unprecedented performance of 659.7 PFLOPS (43.1% peak FP64 performance) on 619,124 electrons using 8,000 GPU nodes of Frontier supercomputer. Sambit Das, Bikash Kanungo, Vishal Subramanian, Gourab Panigrahi, Phani Motamarri, David M. Rogers 0001, Paul M. Zimmerman, Vikram Gavini |
SC | 7 |
| 2022 | Adaptive Sampling for DiscoveryabstractIn this paper, we study a sequential decision-making problem, called Adaptive Sampling for Discovery (ASD). Starting with a large unlabeled dataset, algorithms for ASD adaptively label the points with the goal to maximize the sum of responses.This problem has wide applications to real-world discovery problems, for example drug discovery with the help of machine learning models. ASD algorithms face the well-known exploration-exploitation dilemma. The algorithm needs to choose points that yield information to improve model estimates but it also needs to exploit the model. We rigorously formulate the problem and propose a general information-directed sampling (IDS) algorithm. We provide theoretical guarantees for the performance of IDS in linear, graph and low-rank models. The benefits of IDS are shown in both simulation experiments and real-data experiments for discovering chemical reaction conditions. Ziping Xu, Eunjae Shim, Ambuj Tewari, Paul M. Zimmerman |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2020 | TorsionNet: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Sequential Conformer SearchabstractMolecular geometry prediction of flexible molecules, or conformer search, is a long-standing challenge in computational chemistry. This task is of great importance for predicting structure-activity relationships for a wide variety of substances ranging from biomolecules to ubiquitous materials. Substantial computational resources are invested in Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics methods to generate diverse and representative conformer sets for medium to large molecules, which are yet intractable to chemoinformatic conformer search methods. We present TorsionNet, an efficient sequential conformer search technique based on reinforcement learning under the rigid rotor approximation. The model is trained via curriculum learning, whose theoretical benefit is explored in detail, to maximize a novel metric grounded in thermodynamics called the Gibbs Score. Our experimental results show that TorsionNet outperforms the highest-scoring chemoinformatics method by 4x on large branched alkanes, and by several orders of magnitude on the previously unexplored biopolymer lignin, with applications in renewable energy. TorsionNet also outperforms the far more exhaustive but computationally intensive Self-Guided Molecular Dynamics sampling method. Tarun Gogineni, Ziping Xu, Exequiel Punzalan, Runxuan Jiang, Joshua Kammeraad, Ambuj Tewari, Paul M. Zimmerman |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2018 | Active Learning for Non-Parametric Regression Using Purely Random TreesabstractActive learning is the task of using labelled data to select additional points to label, with the goal of fitting the most accurate model with a fixed budget of labelled points. In binary classification active learning is known to produce faster rates than passive learning for a broad range of settings. However in regression restrictive structure and tailored methods were previously needed to obtain theoretically superior performance. In this paper we propose an intuitive tree based active learning algorithm for non-parametric regression with provable improvement over random sampling. When implemented with Mondrian Trees our algorithm is tuning parameter free, consistent and minimax optimal for Lipschitz functions. Jack Goetz, Ambuj Tewari, Paul M. Zimmerman |
NeurIPS | 3 |