Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kartik Jain

dblp:130/5761 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6540-9304ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 50% Data models and query languages · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data models and query languages › query interface
query by example
0.512021
Answering Regular Path Queries through Exemplars · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Graph data management › path query
regular path query
0.512021
Answering Regular Path Queries through Exemplars · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory
network analysis
0.112021
Answering Regular Path Queries through Exemplars · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

biermann and feldman's algorithm · 1.0NFA-guided random walks with restarts · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Corrigendum to "Detection and analysis of cerebral aneurysms based on X-ray rotational angiography - the CADA 2020 challenge" [Medical Image Analysis, April 2022, Volume 77, 102333]
Matthias Ivantsits, Leonid Goubergrits, Jan-Martin Kuhnigk, Markus Hüllebrand, Jan Brüning, Tabea Kossen, Boris Pfahringer, Jens Schaller, Andreas Spuler, Titus Kühne, Yizhuan Jia, Xuesong Li 0003, Suprosanna Shit, Bjoern Menze, Ziyu Su, Jun Ma 0016, Ziwei Nie, Kartik Jain, Yi Lin 0009, Anja Hennemuth
Medical Image Anal.18
2022 Detection and analysis of cerebral aneurysms based on X-ray rotational angiography - the CADA 2020 challenge
Matthias Ivantsits, Leonid Goubergrits, Jan-Martin Kuhnigk, Markus Hüllebrand, Jan Brüning, Tabea Kossen, Boris Pfahringer, Jens Schaller, Andreas Spuler, Titus Kühne, Yizhuan Jia, Xuesong Li 0003, Suprosanna Shit, Bjoern Menze, Ziyu Su, Jun Ma 0016, Ziwei Nie, Kartik Jain, Yi Lin 0009, Anja Hennemuth
Medical Image Anal.18
2021 Answering Regular Path Queries through Exemplars
abstract
Regular simple path query (RPQ) is one of the fundamental operators in graph analytics. In an RPQ, the input is a graph, a source node and a regular expression. The goal is to identify all nodes that are connected to the source through a simple path whose label sequence satisfies the given regular expression. The regular expression acts as a formal specification of the search space that is of interest to the user. Although regular expressions have high expressive power, they act as barrier to non-technical users. Furthermore, to fully realize the power of regular expressions, the user must be familiar with the domain of the graph dataset. In this study, we address this bottleneck by bridging RPQs with the query-by-example paradigm. More specifically, we ask the user for an exemplar pair that characterizes the paths of interest, and the regular expression is automatically inferred from this exemplar. This novel problem introduces several new challenges. How do we infer the regex? Given that answering RPQs is NP-hard, how do we scale to large graphs? We address these challenges through a unique combination of Biermann and Feldman's algorithm with NFA-guided random walks with restarts. Extensive experiments on multiple real, million-scale datasets establish that RQuBE is at least 3 orders of magnitude faster than baseline strategies with an average accuracy in excess of 90%.
Komal Chauhan, Kartik Jain, Sayan Ranu, Srikanta J. Bedathur, Amitabha Bagchi
Proc. VLDB Endow.2