VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abigail Raz
dblp:130/6973
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2081-598XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | The iterative independent model
Erin Meger, Abigail Raz |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 2020 | Upper Tail Bounds for CyclesabstractThis paper examines bounds on upper tails for cycle counts in $G_{n,p}$. For a fixed graph $H$ define $\xi_H= \xi_H^{n,p}$ to be the number of copies of $H$ in $G_{n,p}$. It is a much studied and surprisingly difficult problem to understand the upper tail of the distribution of $\xi_H$, for example, to estimate $\mathbb{P}(\xi_H > 2 \mathbb{E}\xi_H).$ The best known result for general $H$ and $p$ is due to Janson, Oleszkiewicz, and Ruciński [ Israel J. Math., 142 (2004), pp. 61--92], who proved that $ \exp[-O_{H, \eta}(M_H(n,p) \ln(1/p))]<\mathbb{P}(\xi_H > (1+\eta)\mathbb{E} \xi_H)<\exp[-\Omega_{H, \eta}(M_{H}(n,p))]. $ Thus they determined the upper tail up to a factor of $\ln(1/p)$ in the exponent. There has since been substantial work to improve these bounds for particular $H$ and $p$. We close the $\ln(1/p)$ gap for cycles, up to a constant in the exponent. Here the lower bound stated above is accurate for $l$-cycles when $p> \frac{\ln^{1/(l-2)}n}{n}$. Abigail Raz |
SIAM J. Discret. Math. | 1 |