Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim Foltz

dblp:131/4124 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Environmental and earth informatics › geoscience
geoscience informatics
0.012013
GeoDeepDive: statistical inference using familiar data-processing languages · SIGMOD Conference 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feature engineering · 0.3distant supervision · 0.3crowdsourcing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 GeoDeepDive: statistical inference using familiar data-processing languages
abstract
We describe our proposed demonstration of GeoDeepDive, a system that helps geoscientists discover information and knowledge buried in the text, tables, and figures of geology journal articles. This requires solving a host of classical data management challenges including data acquisition (e.g., from scanned documents), data extraction, and data integration. SIGMOD attendees will see demonstrations of three aspects of our system: (1) an end-to-end system that is of a high enough quality to perform novel geological science, but is written by a small enough team so that each aspect can be manageably explained; (2) a simple feature engineering system that allows a user to write in familiar SQL or Python; and (3) the effect of different sources of feedback on result quality including expert labeling, distant supervision, traditional rules, and crowd-sourced data.
Ce Zhang 0001, Vidhya Govindaraju, Jackson Borchardt, Tim Foltz, Christopher Ré, Shanan Peters
SIGMOD Conference4