Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simon Papillon-Cavanagh
dblp:131/4630
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0002-0372-2266ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › ensemble learning
ensemble feature selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | mRMRe: an R package for parallelized mRMR ensemble feature selection · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
feature selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | mRMRe: an R package for parallelized mRMR ensemble feature selection · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genomic data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | mRMRe: an R package for parallelized mRMR ensemble feature selection · Bioinform. 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimum redundancy maximum relevance · 0.2ensemble learning · 0.2OpenMP parallelization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | mRMRe: an R package for parallelized mRMR ensemble feature selectionabstractMOTIVATION: Feature selection is one of the main challenges in analyzing high-throughput genomic data. Minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) is a particularly fast feature selection method for finding a set of both relevant and complementary features. Here we describe the mRMRe R package, in which the mRMR technique is extended by using an ensemble approach to better explore the feature space and build more robust predictors. To deal with the computational complexity of the ensemble approach, the main functions of the package are implemented and parallelized in C using the openMP Application Programming Interface. RESULTS: Our ensemble mRMR implementations outperform the classical mRMR approach in terms of prediction accuracy. They identify genes more relevant to the biological context and may lead to richer biological interpretations. The parallelized functions included in the package show significant gains in terms of run-time speed when compared with previously released packages. AVAILABILITY: The R package mRMRe is available on Comprehensive R Archive Network and is provided open source under the Artistic-2.0 License. The code used to generate all the results reported in this application note is available from Supplementary File 1. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Nicolas De Jay, Simon Papillon-Cavanagh, Catharina Olsen, Nehme Hachem, Gianluca Bontempi, Benjamin Haibe-Kains |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2013 | Research and applications: Comparison and validation of genomic predictors for anticancer drug sensitivityabstractBACKGROUND: An enduring challenge in personalized medicine lies in selecting the right drug for each individual patient. While testing of drugs on patients in large trials is the only way to assess their clinical efficacy and toxicity, we dramatically lack resources to test the hundreds of drugs currently under development. Therefore the use of preclinical model systems has been intensively investigated as this approach enables response to hundreds of drugs to be tested in multiple cell lines in parallel. METHODS: Two large-scale pharmacogenomic studies recently screened multiple anticancer drugs on over 1000 cell lines. We propose to combine these datasets to build and robustly validate genomic predictors of drug response. We compared five different approaches for building predictors of increasing complexity. We assessed their performance in cross-validation and in two large validation sets, one containing the same cell lines present in the training set and another dataset composed of cell lines that have never been used during the training phase. RESULTS: Sixteen drugs were found in common between the datasets. We were able to validate multivariate predictors for three out of the 16 tested drugs, namely irinotecan, PD-0325901, and PLX4720. Moreover, we observed that response to 17-AAG, an inhibitor of Hsp90, could be efficiently predicted by the expression level of a single gene, NQO1. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that genomic predictors could be robustly validated for specific drugs. If successfully validated in patients' tumor cells, and subsequently in clinical trials, they could act as companion tests for the corresponding drugs and play an important role in personalized medicine. Simon Papillon-Cavanagh, Nicolas De Jay, Nehme Hachem, Catharina Olsen, Gianluca Bontempi, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, John Quackenbush, Benjamin Haibe-Kains |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 1 |