Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Tobias Ludwig 0003

dblp:131/9487-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0030-4421ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Generative modeling · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
cognitive modeling
0.912025
Generating Computational Cognitive models using Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
model generation
0.912025
Generating Computational Cognitive models using Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.912025
Generating Computational Cognitive models using Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7iterative refinement · 1.7in-context learning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Generating Computational Cognitive models using Large Language Models
abstract
Computational cognitive models, which formalize theories of cognition, enable researchers to quantify cognitive processes and arbitrate between competing theories by fitting models to behavioral data. Traditionally, these models are handcrafted, which requires significant domain knowledge, coding expertise, and time investment. However, recent advances in machine learning offer solutions to these challenges. In particular, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities for in-context pattern recognition, leveraging knowledge from diverse domains to solve complex problems, and generating executable code that can be used to facilitate the generation of cognitive models. Building on this potential, we introduce a pipeline for Guided generation of Computational Cognitive Models (GeCCo). Given task instructions, participant data, and a template function, GeCCo prompts an LLM to propose candidate models, fits proposals to held-out data, and iteratively refines them based on feedback constructed from their predictive performance. We benchmark this approach across four different cognitive domains -- decision making, learning, planning, and memory -- using three open-source LLMs, spanning different model sizes, capacities, and families. On four human behavioral data sets, the LLM generated models that consistently matched or outperformed the best domain-specific models from the cognitive science literature. To validate these findings, we performed control experiments that investigated (1) the contribution of the different LLM features (model size, model family, capacities); (2) the causal role of different prompt components; (3) the effect of data contamination; (4) the ability to recover ground truth models from simulated data; and (5) the total explainable variance in human behavior captured by LLM-generated models. Taken together, our results suggest that LLMs can rapidly generate cognitive models with conceptually plausible theories that rival -- or even surpass -- the best models from the literature across diverse task domains.
Milena Rmus, Akshay K. Jagadish, Marvin Mathony, Tobias Ludwig 0003, Eric Schulz
NeurIPS4
2022 Connecting Exploration, Generalization, and Planning in Correlated Trees
Tobias Ludwig 0003, Charley M. Wu, Eric Schulz
CogSci1