Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chee-Yee Chong

dblp:132/4836 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
32ranked-venue papers
13as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8234-184XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 30 · 12 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 88% Embedded and real-time systems · 12%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.012003
Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges · Proc. IEEE 2003
Distributed systems › distributed data processing
distributed data fusion
0.011997
Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed estimation
0.011997
Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › distributed processing
collaborative signal processing
0.012003
Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges · Proc. IEEE 2003
Internet of things and sensor networks
sensor network security
0.012003
Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges · Proc. IEEE 2003
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
wireless sensor network routing
0.012003
Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges · Proc. IEEE 2003
Distributed systems
distributed data association
0.011997
Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997
Embedded and real-time systems
sensor fusion
0.011997
Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

localized algorithm · 0.0distributed tracking · 0.0directed diffusion · 0.0multiple hypothesis tracking · 0.0joint probabilistic data association · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Primex - Prime-Based Graph Encoding and Extraction for Information Fusion
abstract
PRIMEX (PRIME-based Graph Encoding and Extraction for Information Fusion) is a novel framework designed to enhance distributed information fusion while minimizing communication overhead and computational complexity. Traditional information graph (IG)-based approaches require frequent synchronization and large-scale graph updates, leading to significant communication demands. PRIMEX overcomes these challenges by encoding information pedigree of state estimates as products of distinct prime numbers, allowing fusion to be performed using lightweight arithmetic operations such as greatest common divisor (GCD) for redundancy removal and least common multiple (LCM) for data integration. This eliminates the need for transmitting complex graph structures and instead leverages prime factorization-based queries to efficiently identify shared information, significantly improving scalability. PRIMEX is particularly well-suited for edge computing environments and decentralized systems, where reducing communication, computation, and memory overhead is crucial. By supporting federated learning principles, PRIMEX enhances system adaptability while preserving data privacy, making it a practical solution for scalable, distributed information fusion in applications such as autonomous systems, multi-agent networks, and large-scale sensing platforms.
Kuo-Chu Chang, Way Kuo, Yaakov Bar-Shalom, Chee-Yee Chong, Shozo Mori
FUSION4
2021 An Overview of Machine Learning Methods for Multiple Target Tracking
Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION1
2019 Multiple Hypothesis Tracking for Processing Tracklets
Chee-Yee Chong, Shozo Mori
FUSION1
2019 Distributed Multiple Hypothesis Tracking in Finite Point Process Formalism: A Simple Two Station Case
Shozo Mori, Chee-Yee Chong, Kuo-Chu Chang
FUSION2
2018 A Review of Forty Years of Distributed Estimation
abstract
This paper reviews forty years of distributed estimation research since the first papers on decentralized filtering appeared in 1978. Starting with a formulation of the problem, it reviews the assumptions and objectives of the main approaches, including information decorrelation, cross-covariance fusion, channel filters, covariance intersection, maximum a posteriori probability fusion, best linear unbiased estimate, and distributed Kalman filters based on pseudo estimates and augmented state estimates. It also reviews algorithms motivated by sensor networks with flexible communication including consensus and diffusion filters. Suggestions for future research are provided.
Chee-Yee Chong, Kuo-Chu Chang, Shozo Mori
FUSION1
2018 Forty Years of Multiple Hypothesis Tracking - A Review of Key Developments
abstract
Multiple hypothesis tracking addresses difficult multiple target tracking problems by making association decisions using multiple scans or frames of data. This paper reviews forty years of its development, including the original measurement-oriented approach of Reid, track-oriented approach first formulated by Morefield, distributed processing, and recent graph-based approaches. It also discusses its relationship with random set approaches for tracking.
Chee-Yee Chong, Shozo Mori, Donald B. Reid
FUSION1
2016 Comparison of optimal distributed estimation and consensus filtering
Chee-Yee Chong, Kuo-Chu Chang, Shozo Mori
FUSION1
2016 Three formalisms of multiple hypothesis tracking
Shozo Mori, Chee-Yee Chong, Kuo-Chu Chang
FUSION2
2015 Track association using augmented state estimates
Chee-Yee Chong, Shozo Mori
FUSION1
2015 Comparison of augmented state track fusion methods for non-full-rate communication
Felix Govaers, Chee-Yee Chong, Shozo Mori, Wolfgang Koch 0001
FUSION2
2015 An application of interacting multiple model tracking method to financial modeling and asset allocation
Shozo Mori, Kuo-Chu Chang, Hajime Takahashi, Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION4
2014 Comparison of tracklet fusion and distributed Kalman filter for track fusion
Chee-Yee Chong, Shozo Mori, Felix Govaers, Wolfgang Koch 0001
FUSION1
2014 Group state estimation algorithm using Foliage Penetration GMTI radar detections
Shozo Mori, Hui Hoang, Pablo O. Arambel, Constantino Rago, Michael J. Shea, Patricia L. Davey, Chee-Yee Chong, Steve J. Alter
FUSION7
2013 Optimal fusion for non-zero process noise
Chee-Yee Chong, Shozo Mori
FUSION1
2013 Performance analysis of graph-based track stitching
Shozo Mori, Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION2
2012 Graph approaches for data association
Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION1
2012 Comparison of track fusion rules and track association metrics
Shozo Mori, Kuo-Chu Chang, Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION3
2011 Performance prediction of feature aided track-to-track association
Shozo Mori, Chee-Yee Chong, Kuo-Chu Chang
FUSION2
2009 Efficient multiple hypothesis tracking by track segment graph
Chee-Yee Chong, Greg Castañón, Nathan Cooprider, Shozo Mori, Ravi Ravichandran, Robert Macior
FUSION1
2009 Track association and fusion using Janossy measure density functions
Shozo Mori, Chee-Yee Chong, Kuo-Chu Chang
FUSION2
2009 Lessons learned in the creation of a data set for hard/soft information fusion
Marco A. Pravia, Olga Babko-Malaya, Michael K. Schneider, James V. White, Chee-Yee Chong, Alan S. Willsky
FUSION5
2008 On scalable distributed sensor fusion
Kuo-Chu Chang, Chee-Yee Chong, Shozo Mori
FUSION2
2008 Continuous-time interacting multiple model extrapolation
Shozo Mori, Jason Adaska, Marco A. Pravia, Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION4
2008 Markov chain Monte Carlo method for evaluating multi-frame data association hypotheses
Shozo Mori, Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION2
2008 Generation of a fundamental data set for hard/soft information fusion
Marco A. Pravia, Ravi K. Prasanth, Pablo O. Arambel, Candace L. Sidner, Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION5
2007 Generalized Murty's algorithm with application to multiple hypothesis tracking
abstract
This paper describes a generalization of Murty's algorithm generating ranked solutions for classical assignment problems. The generalization extends the domain to a general class of zero-one integer linear programming problems that can be used to solve multiframe data association problems for track-oriented multiple hypothesis tracking (MHT). The generalized Murty's algorithm mostly follows the steps of Murty's ranking algorithm for assignment problems. It was implemented in a hybrid data fusion engine, called All- Source Track and Identity Fusion (ATIF), to provide a kbest multiple-frame association hypothesis selection capability, which is used for output ambiguity assessment, hypothesis space pruning, and multi-modal track outputs.
Evan Fortunato, William Kreamer, Shozo Mori, Chee-Yee Chong, Greg Castañón
FUSION4
2007 An alternative form of cardinalized PHD filter or I.I.D.-approximation filter
abstract
In this paper, we derive the updating formula of the cardinalized probability hypothesis density (CPHD) filter recently developed in [1-4], from the non-Poisson multiple-hypothesis tracking (MHT) algorithm developed earlier [23,24]. The particular form of the CPHD updating formula developed in this paper is expressed only with the probability hypothesis density (PHD) or the a posteriori intensity measure density and the a posteriori probability of the number of targets, without using the probability generating function, and is consistent with the updating formula in [5]. Several issues concerning the CPHD updating formula and the sensor modeling are discussed together with a couple of very simple but illustrative examples.
Shozo Mori, Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION2
2006 Decision-Theoretic Sensor Resource Management
abstract
Sensor resource management is usually formulated as an optimization problem under uncertainty. We use a decision-theoretic model to show that the objective function should not be just tracking or target identification performance. Instead, it should represent the expected value of the outcome from using the collected data. This outcome depends on how the collected data and fusion results are used in making other resource management decisions such as weapon to target assignment. We argue the need for considering the integrated sensor/weapon management problem and propose a decomposition to make the solution feasible
Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION1
2006 Metrics for Feature-Aided Track Association
abstract
Track fusion over a network of sensors requires association of the tracks before the state estimates can be combined. Track association generally involves two steps: evaluating an association metric to score each track-to-track association hypothesis, and selecting the best assignment between two sets of tracks. In many applications feature-aided track association can provide better performance than association with only kinematic data (e.g., position and velocity) when the target density is high. This paper develops a general association metric to support feature-aided track association that considers similarity in both the feature and kinematic domains. The association metric is based upon the maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) approach and can be used for general target and sensor models. Special forms of the association metric are given for some common situations. Numerical results illustrate the performance of different feature association metrics
Chee-Yee Chong, Shozo Mori
FUSION1
2006 Tracking of Groups of Targets Using Generalized Janossy Measure Density Function
abstract
This paper describes a new approach to tracking multiple groups of targets using the concept of the generalized Janossy measure density function. Each group is modeled by a group state that consists of a group common state and an unknown number of individual target component states. In order to represent a probability distribution of such a group state, we propose to use a generalized version of the Janossy measure density function. We will formulate our tracking problem as a distributed estimation problem in which each local sensor processing unit (node) produces single-frame-based group-level detections and a central fusion center (node) fuses those detections into group tracks. A simple illustrative example will be given
Shozo Mori, Chee-Yee Chong
FUSION2
2003 Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges
abstract
Wireless microsensor networks have been identified as one of the most important technologies for the 21st century. This paper traces the history of research in sensor networks over the past three decades, including two important programs of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) spanning this period: the Distributed Sensor Networks (DSN) and the Sensor Information Technology (SensIT) programs. Technology trends that impact the development of sensor networks are reviewed, and new applications such as infrastructure security, habitat monitoring, and traffic control are presented. Technical challenges in sensor network development include network discovery, control and routing, collaborative signal and information processing, tasking and querying, and security. The paper concludes by presenting some recent research results in sensor network algorithms, including localized algorithms and directed diffusion, distributed tracking in wireless ad hoc networks, and distributed classification using local agents.
Chee-Yee Chong, Srikanta P. Kumar
Proc. IEEE1
1997 Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking
abstract
Modern surveillance systems often utilize multiple physically distributed sensors of different types to provide complementary and overlapping coverage on targets. In order to generate target tracks and estimates, the sensor data need to be fused. While a centralized processing approach is theoretically optimal, there are significant advantages in distributing the fusion operations over multiple processing nodes. This paper discusses architectures for distributed fusion, whereby each node processes the data from its own set of sensors and communicates with other nodes to improve on the estimates, The information graph is introduced as a way of modeling information flow in distributed fusion systems and for developing algorithms. Fusion for target tracking involves two main operations: estimation and association. Distributed estimation algorithms based on the information graph are presented for arbitrary fusion architectures and related to linear and nonlinear distributed estimation results. The distributed data association problem is discussed in terms of track-to-track association likelihoods. Distributed versions of two popular tracking approaches (joint probabilistic data association and multiple hypothesis tracking) are then presented, and examples of applications are given.
Martin E. Liggins, Chee-Yee Chong, Ivan Kadar, Mark G. Alford, Vincent Vannicola, Stelios C. A. Thomopoulos
Proc. IEEE2