VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tomás Kociský
dblp:132/8977
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Language models and text generation · 40% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% Question answering and dialogue systems · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 60% Query processing and optimization · 31% Data models and query languages · 9% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › coherent text generation
entity-based coherence |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Towards Coherent and Consistent Use of Entities in Narrative Generation · ICML 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
story generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Towards Coherent and Consistent Use of Entities in Narrative Generation · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › pre-trained model continual learning
continual learning for language models |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
temporal distribution shift |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
temporal generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
language model architecture |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mogrifier LSTM · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mogrifier LSTM · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mogrifier LSTM · ICLR 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
semi-supervised semantic parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence transduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
sequential autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016 |
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Latent Predictor Networks for Code Generation · ACL (1) 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend · NIPS 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend · NIPS 2015 |
Query processing and optimization › query execution
factorised query evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Aggregation and Ordering in Factorised Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › benchmark
benchmark construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented question answering · 1.1parametric fine-tuning · 1.1streaming evaluation · 1.0Transformer-XL · 1.0dynamic entity memory · 0.6auxiliary entity-related loss · 0.6semi-supervised learning · 0.2latent variable generative model · 0.2latent predictor networks · 0.2supervised reading comprehension · 0.2attention mechanism · 0.2partial aggregation · 0.2factorisation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | StreamingQA: A Benchmark for Adaptation to New Knowledge over Time in Question Answering ModelsabstractKnowledge and language understanding of models evaluated through question answering (QA) has been usually studied on static snapshots of knowledge, like Wikipedia. However, our world is dynamic, evolves over time, and our models’ knowledge becomes outdated. To study how semi-parametric QA models and their underlying parametric language models (LMs) adapt to evolving knowledge, we construct a new large-scale dataset, StreamingQA, with human written and generated questions asked on a given date, to be answered from 14 years of time-stamped news articles. We evaluate our models quarterly as they read new articles not seen in pre-training. We show that parametric models can be updated without full retraining, while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. For semi-parametric models, adding new articles into the search space allows for rapid adaptation, however, models with an outdated underlying LM under-perform those with a retrained LM. For questions about higher-frequency named entities, parametric updates are particularly beneficial. In our dynamic world, the StreamingQA dataset enables a more realistic evaluation of QA models, and our experiments highlight several promising directions for future research. Adam Liska, Tomás Kociský, Elena Gribovskaya, Tayfun Terzi, Eren Sezener, Devang Agrawal, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tim Scholtes, Manzil Zaheer, Susannah Young, Ellen Gilsenan-McMahon, Sophia Austin, Phil Blunsom, Angeliki Lazaridou |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Towards Coherent and Consistent Use of Entities in Narrative GenerationabstractLarge pre-trained language models (LMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in generating long, fluent text; however, there is little to no analysis on their ability to maintain entity coherence and consistency. In this work, we focus on the end task of narrative generation and systematically analyse the long-range entity coherence and consistency in generated stories. First, we propose a set of automatic metrics for measuring model performance in terms of entity usage. Given these metrics, we quantify the limitations of current LMs. Next, we propose augmenting a pre-trained LM with a dynamic entity memory in an end-to-end manner by using an auxiliary entity-related loss for guiding the reads and writes to the memory. We demonstrate that the dynamic entity memory increases entity coherence according to both automatic and human judgment and helps preserving entity-related information especially in settings with a limited context window. Finally, we also validate that our automatic metrics are correlated with human ratings and serve as a good indicator of the quality of generated stories. Pinelopi Papalampidi, Kris Cao, Tomás Kociský |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language ModelsabstractOur world is open-ended, non-stationary, and constantly evolving; thus what we talk about and how we talk about it change over time. This inherent dynamic nature of language contrasts with the current static language modelling paradigm, which trains and evaluates models on utterances from overlapping time periods. Despite impressive recent progress, we demonstrate that Transformer-XL language models perform worse in the realistic setup of predicting future utterances from beyond their training period, and that model performance becomes increasingly worse with time. We find that, while increasing model size alone—a key driver behind recent progress—does not solve this problem, having models that continually update their knowledge with new information can indeed mitigate this performance degradation over time. Hence, given the compilation of ever-larger language modelling datasets, combined with the growing list of language-model-based NLP applications that require up-to-date factual knowledge about the world, we argue that now is the right time to rethink the static way in which we currently train and evaluate our language models, and develop adaptive language models that can remain up-to-date with respect to our ever-changing and non-stationary world. We publicly release our dynamic, streaming language modelling benchmarks for WMT and arXiv to facilitate language model evaluation that takes temporal dynamics into account. Angeliki Lazaridou, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Elena Gribovskaya, Devang Agrawal, Adam Liska, Tayfun Terzi, Mai Gimenez, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tomás Kociský, Sebastian Ruder, Dani Yogatama, Kris Cao, Susannah Young, Phil Blunsom |
NeurIPS | 9 |
| 2020 | Mogrifier LSTM
Gábor Melis, Tomás Kociský, Phil Blunsom |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2018 | The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension ChallengeabstractReading comprehension (RC)—in contrast to information retrieval—requires integrating information and reasoning about events, entities, and their relations across a full document. Question answering is conventionally used to assess RC ability, in both artificial agents and children learning to read. However, existing RC datasets and tasks are dominated by questions that can be solved by selecting answers using superficial information (e.g., local context similarity or global term frequency); they thus fail to test for the essential integrative aspect of RC. To encourage progress on deeper comprehension of language, we present a new dataset and set of tasks in which the reader must answer questions about stories by reading entire books or movie scripts. These tasks are designed so that successfully answering their questions requires understanding the underlying narrative rather than relying on shallow pattern matching or salience. We show that although humans solve the tasks easily, standard RC models struggle on the tasks presented here. We provide an analysis of the dataset and the challenges it presents. Tomás Kociský, Jonathan Schwarz, Phil Blunsom, Chris Dyer, Karl Moritz Hermann, Gábor Melis, Edward Grefenstette |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2017 | The Neural Noisy Channel
Lei Yu 0008, Phil Blunsom, Chris Dyer, Edward Grefenstette, Tomás Kociský |
ICLR (Poster) | 5 |
| 2016 | Latent Predictor Networks for Code GenerationabstractWang Ling, Phil Blunsom, Edward Grefenstette, Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomáš Kočiský, Fumin Wang, Andrew Senior. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2016. Wang Ling, Phil Blunsom, Edward Grefenstette, Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomás Kociský, Fumin Wang, Andrew W. Senior |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential AutoencodersabstractWe present a novel semi-supervised approach for sequence transduction and apply it to semantic parsing.The unsupervised component is based on a generative model in which latent sentences generate the unpaired logical forms.We apply this method to a number of semantic parsing tasks focusing on domains with limited access to labelled training data and extend those datasets with synthetically generated logical forms. Tomás Kociský, Gábor Melis, Edward Grefenstette, Chris Dyer, Wang Ling, Phil Blunsom, Karl Moritz Hermann |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2015 | Teaching Machines to Read and ComprehendabstractTeaching machines to read natural language documents remains an elusive challenge. Machine reading systems can be tested on their ability to answer questions posed on the contents of documents that they have seen, but until now large scale training and test datasets have been missing for this type of evaluation. In this work we define a new methodology that resolves this bottleneck and provides large scale supervised reading comprehension data. This allows us to develop a class of attention based deep neural networks that learn to read real documents and answer complex questions with minimal prior knowledge of language structure. Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomás Kociský, Edward Grefenstette, Lasse Espeholt, Will Kay, Mustafa Suleyman, Phil Blunsom |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2013 | Aggregation and Ordering in Factorised DatabasesabstractA common approach to data analysis involves understanding and manipulating succinct representations of data. In earlier work, we put forward a succinct representation system for relational data called factorised databases and reported on the main-memory query engine FDB for select-project-join queries on such databases. In this paper, we extend FDB to support a larger class of practical queries with aggregates and ordering. This requires novel optimisation and evaluation techniques. We show how factorisation coupled with partial aggregation can effectively reduce the number of operations needed for query evaluation. We also show how factorisations of query results can support enumeration of tuples in desired orders as efficiently as listing them from the unfactorised, sorted results. We experimentally observe that FDB can outperform off-the-shelf relational engines by orders of magnitude. Nurzhan Bakibayev, Tomás Kociský, Dan Olteanu, Jakub Závodný |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |