Suming Jeremiah Chen

dblp:133/1953 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 47% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 27% Representation and self-supervised learning · 27%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.212015
Value of Information Based on Decision Robustness · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network › bayesian network classifiers
naive bayes
0.212015
Value of Information Based on Decision Robustness · AAAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › decision making under uncertainty
value of information
0.212015
Value of Information Based on Decision Robustness · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference
0.212013
An Exact Algorithm for Computing the Same-Decision Probability · IJCAI 2013
Algorithms and data structures
exact algorithms
0.212013
An Exact Algorithm for Computing the Same-Decision Probability · IJCAI 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

information gain · 0.2classification loss · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Value of Information Based on Decision Robustness
abstract
There are many criteria for measuring the value of information (VOI), each based on a different principle that is usually suitable for specific applications. We propose a new criterion for measuring the value of information, which values information that leads to robust decisions (i.e., ones that are unlikely to change due to new information). We also introduce an algorithm for Naive Bayes networks that selects features with maximal VOI under the new criteria. We discuss the application of the new criteria to classification tasks, showing how it can be used to tradeoff the budget, allotted for acquiring information, with the classification accuracy. In particular, we show empirically that the new criteria can reduce the expended budget significantly while reducing the classification accuracy only slightly. We also show empirically that the new criterion leads to decisions that are much more robust than those based on traditional VOI criteria, such as information gain and classification loss. This make the new criteria particularly suitable for certain decision making applications.
Suming Jeremiah Chen, Arthur Choi, Adnan Darwiche
AAAI1
2014 Algorithms and Applications for the Same-Decision Probability
abstract
When making decisions under uncertainty, the optimal choices are often difficult to discern, especially if not enough information has been gathered. Two key questions in this regard relate to whether one should stop the information gathering process and commit to a decision (stopping criterion), and if not, what information to gather next (selection criterion). In this paper, we show that the recently introduced notion, Same-Decision Probability (SDP), can be useful as both a stopping and a selection criterion, as it can provide additional insight and allow for robust decision making in a variety of scenarios. This query has been shown to be highly intractable, being PP^PP-complete, and is exemplary of a class of queries which correspond to the computation of certain expectations. We propose the first exact algorithm for computing the SDP, and demonstrate its effectiveness on several real and synthetic networks. Finally, we present new complexity results, such as the complexity of computing the SDP on models with a Naive Bayes structure. Additionally, we prove that computing the non-myopic value of information is complete for the same complexity class as computing the SDP.
Suming Jeremiah Chen, Arthur Choi, Adnan Darwiche
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1
2013 An Exact Algorithm for Computing the Same-Decision Probability
Suming Jeremiah Chen, Arthur Choi, Adnan Darwiche
IJCAI1