Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

David B. Smith 0002

dblp:133/2005 · also David Brodie Smith · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 28% Information theory · 28% Approximation and online algorithms · 28%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 51% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 49%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.312017
Order Statistics for Probabilistic Graphical Models · IJCAI 2017
Automated reasoning and model checking › probabilistic inference
graphical model inference
0.312017
Order Statistics for Probabilistic Graphical Models · IJCAI 2017
Information theory › probability theory
order statistics
0.312017
Order Statistics for Probabilistic Graphical Models · IJCAI 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › statistical relational learning
lifted inference
0.212015
Bounding the Cost of Search-Based Lifted Inference · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
junction tree inference
0.212013
The Inclusion-Exclusion Rule and its Application to the Junction Tree Algorithm · IJCAI 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
importance sampling
0.112015
Bounding the Cost of Search-Based Lifted Inference · NIPS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree decomposition · 0.3sampling · 0.3rao-blackwellisation · 0.2lifted importance sampling · 0.2AND/OR search · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Order Statistics for Probabilistic Graphical Models
abstract
We consider the problem of computing r-th order statistics, namely finding an assignment having rank r in a probabilistic graphical model. We show that the problem is NP-hard even when the graphical model has no edges (zero-treewidth models) via a reduction from the partition problem. We use this reduction, specifically a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for number partitioning to yield a pseudo-polynomial time approximation algorithm for solving the r-th order statistics problem in zero- treewidth models. We then extend this algorithm to arbitrary graphical models by generalizing it to tree decompositions, and demonstrate via experimental evaluation on various datasets that our proposed algorithm is more accurate than sampling algorithms.
David B. Smith 0002, Sara Rouhani, Vibhav Gogate
IJCAI1
2015 Bounding the Cost of Search-Based Lifted Inference
abstract
Recently, there has been growing interest in systematic search-based and importance sampling-based lifted inference algorithms for statistical relational models (SRMs). These lifted algorithms achieve significant complexity reductions over their propositional counterparts by using lifting rules that leverage symmetries in the relational representation. One drawback of these algorithms is that they use an inference-blind representation of the search space, which makes it difficult to efficiently pre-compute tight upper bounds on the exact cost of inference without running the algorithm to completion. In this paper, we present a principled approach to address this problem. We introduce a lifted analogue of the propositional And/Or search space framework, which we call a lifted And/Or schematic. Given a schematic-based representation of an SRM, we show how to efficiently compute a tight upper bound on the time and space cost of exact inference from a current assignment and the remaining schematic. We show how our bounding method can be used within a lifted importance sampling algorithm, in order to perform effective Rao-Blackwellisation, and demonstrate experimentally that the Rao-Blackwellised version of the algorithm yields more accurate estimates on several real-world datasets.
David B. Smith 0002, Vibhav Gogate
NIPS1
2014 Loopy Belief Propagation in the Presence of Determinism
abstract
It is well known that loopy Belief propagation (LBP) performs poorly on probabilistic graphical models (PGMs) with determinism. In this paper, we propose a new method for remedying this problem. The key idea in our method is finding a reparameterization of the graphical model such that LBP, when run on the reparameterization, is likely to have better convergence properties than LBP on the original graphical model. We propose several schemes for finding such reparameterizations, all of which leverage unique properties of zeros as well as research on LBP convergence done over the last decade. Our experimental evaluation on a variety of PGMs clearly demonstrates the promise of our method – it often yields accuracy and convergence time improvements of an order of magnitude or more over LBP.
David B. Smith 0002, Vibhav Gogate
AISTATS1
2013 The Inclusion-Exclusion Rule and its Application to the Junction Tree Algorithm
David B. Smith 0002, Vibhav Gogate
IJCAI1