Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sugam Agarwal

dblp:133/3826 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Software-defined and programmable networks · 77% Routing and switching · 12% Network performance modeling · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software-defined and programmable networks
SDN controller
0.212013
Traffic engineering in software defined networks · INFOCOM 2013
Software-defined and programmable networks
SDN traffic engineering
0.212013
Traffic engineering in software defined networks · INFOCOM 2013
Network performance modeling
network utilization
0.012013
Traffic engineering in software defined networks · INFOCOM 2013
Routing and switching
traffic engineering
0.012013
Traffic engineering in software defined networks · INFOCOM 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ns-2 simulation · 0.2FPTAS · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Traffic engineering in software defined networks
abstract
Software Defined Networking is a new networking paradigm that separates the network control plane from the packet forwarding plane and provides applications with an abstracted centralized view of the distributed network state. A logically centralized controller that has a global network view is responsible for all the control decisions and it communicates with the network-wide distributed forwarding elements via standardized interfaces. Google recently announced [5] that it is using a Software Defined Network (SDN) to interconnect its data centers due to the ease, efficiency and flexibility in performing traffic engineering functions. It expects the SDN architecture to result in better network capacity utilization and improved delay and loss performance. The contribution of this paper is on the effective use of SDNs for traffic engineering especially when SDNs are incrementally introduced into an existing network. In particular, we show how to leverage the centralized controller to get significant improvements in network utilization as well as to reduce packet losses and delays. We show that these improvements are possible even in cases where there is only a partial deployment of SDN capability in a network. We formulate the SDN controller's optimization problem for traffic engineering with partial deployment and develop fast Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Schemes (FPTAS) for solving these problems. We show, by both analysis and ns-2 simulations, the performance gains that are achievable using these algorithms even with an incrementally deployed SDN.
Sugam Agarwal, Murali S. Kodialam, T. V. Lakshman
INFOCOM1