Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guanyu Mu

dblp:133/7820 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5299-4199ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › video recommendation
watch-time prediction
1.622026
Relative Advantage Debiasing for Watch-Time Prediction in Short-Video Recommendation · AAAI 2026
Deconfounding Duration Bias in Watch-time Prediction for Video Recommendation · KDD 2022
Recommender systems › video recommendation
short-video recommendation
1.012026
Relative Advantage Debiasing for Watch-Time Prediction in Short-Video Recommendation · AAAI 2026
Recommender systems › debiased recommendation
causal debiasing
0.612022
Deconfounding Duration Bias in Watch-time Prediction for Video Recommendation · KDD 2022
Recommender systems
video recommendation
0.612022
Deconfounding Duration Bias in Watch-time Prediction for Video Recommendation · KDD 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing
0.312026
Relative Advantage Debiasing for Watch-Time Prediction in Short-Video Recommendation · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

two-stage architecture · 2.0quantile-based preference signal · 2.0distributional embeddings · 2.0quantile regression · 0.6deconfounding · 0.6causal graph · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Relative Advantage Debiasing for Watch-Time Prediction in Short-Video Recommendation
abstract
Watch time is widely used as a proxy for user satisfaction in video recommendation platforms. However, raw watch times are influenced by confounding factors such as video duration, popularity, and individual user behaviors, potentially distorting preference signals and resulting in biased recommendation models. We propose a novel relative advantage debiasing framework that corrects watch time by comparing it to empirically derived reference distributions conditioned on user and item groups. This approach yields a quantile-based preference signal and introduces a two-stage architecture that explicitly separates distribution estimation from preference learning. Additionally, we present distributional embeddings to efficiently parameterize watch-time quantiles without requiring online sampling or storage of historical data. Both offline and online experiments demonstrate significant improvements in recommendation accuracy and robustness compared to existing baseline methods.
Emily Liu, Kuan Han, Minfeng Zhan, Bocheng Zhao, Guanyu Mu
AAAI5
2022 Deconfounding Duration Bias in Watch-time Prediction for Video Recommendation
abstract
Watch-time prediction remains to be a key factor in reinforcing user engagement via video recommendations. It has become increasingly important given the ever-growing popularity of online videos. However, prediction of watch time not only depends on the match between the user and the video but is often mislead by the duration of the video itself. With the goal of improving watch time, recommendation is always biased towards videos with long duration. Models trained on this imbalanced data face the risk of bias amplification, which misguides platforms to over-recommend videos with long duration but overlook the underlying user interests. This paper presents the first work to study duration bias in watch-time prediction for video recommendation. We employ a causal graph illuminating that duration is a confounding factor that concurrently affects video exposure and watch-time prediction---the first effect on video causes the bias issue and should be eliminated, while the second effect on watch time originates from video intrinsic characteristics and should be preserved. To remove the undesired bias but leverage the natural effect, we propose a Duration-Deconfounded Quantile-based (D2Q) watch-time prediction framework, which allows for scalability to perform on industry production systems. Through extensive offline evaluation and live experiments, we showcase the effectiveness of this duration-deconfounding framework by significantly outperforming the state-of-the-art baselines. We have fully launched our approach on Kuaishou App, which has substantially improved real-time video consumption due to more accurate watch-time predictions.
Ruohan Zhan, Changhua Pei, Jianfeng Wen, Guanyu Mu, Peng Jiang 0002, Kun Gai
KDD6
2013 VCS: A Verifier for Component-Based Systems
Fei He 0001, Liangze Yin, Bow-Yaw Wang, Lianyi Zhang, Guanyu Mu, Wenrui Meng
ATVA5